Is it morally good or evil to summon a demon for the soul purpose of deriving a sick smack down and sending his ass back to hell?
>>51918492
Summoning a demon has it's costs (human sacrifices, etc). It's not the summoning that's evil, it's you paying the cost that is.
What smack down? as soon as anything crosses the pentagram, be that your fist or your sword, you're fucking toast.
>>51918492
What sort of demon and where are you smacking?
>>51918492
It sounds morally stupid.
>>51918492
Do demons follow cenobite rules? Your heart calls out to them? If your purpose is to dick with them, they don't appear.
>>51918492
It's way too risky, and its consequences could be incredibly bad for you and those around you. You're better off summoning something safer.
>>51918492
I like the idea of an order of Paladins who regularly summon forth Bael'ort Throg, High Nonarch of the Anguish Plains, specifically to kick the shit out of him.
They battled him once before, when he was at full strength, and just barely defeated him. Now they keep curbstomping him to ensure he can never fully recover from the loss.
>>51918492
>summoning a demon solely so you can challenge him to a 1v1 street rules b-ball game
The morality depends on the human/spiritual cost of the actual summoning (see >>51918527) though I don't really understand the point.
>>51919088
>Lord of the anguish plains
Why would someone with that kind of title be afraid of a beating? Probably more like foreplay to it.
The use of the term smack down sounds like you're using the demon as a hype-man for a rap battle
>>51918492
If it's done for exorcist training and doesn't require any foul and immoral activities as part of the summoning it sounds at least neutral.
>>51919425
battle of the bands actually
>>51919425
Hail, mortal scum! It's ya boy Dispater
Here to roast you now, so I can eat you later
With lyrics that sizzle, crackle and hiss
Who dares to trade barbs with the lord of Dis[s]?
>>51919654
Good taste
>>51919715
I realy like you.