What is the mood of most of your games? I run Nobledark most of the time.
This chart is trash
>>51760093
I run nobledark, but less as the chart describes it and more 'characters can make lasting change but the world is a dark shithole' flavour.
Also
>>51760129
>>51760093
Grimbright is probably my favorite
>mix fallout and game of thrones for grimdark
>The King of post apocalyptic America has died and people are fighting over the throne
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNe_mtjIwec
Neutraldark
Grimneutral, but GoT/ASOIAF is way too climactic and "good vs evil" for me
>>51760093
>>51760129
>>51760521
>>51761582
The definitions are decent, but most examples given are absolute dogshit
>>51760093
The one where players can start as basic heroes and end on punching the anthropomorphized fear of Gods through the moon.
Normal folks tend toward decency, and even some of the villains have good reasons for their actions, to the point where the heroes admit maybe the bad guy isn't even that bad.
Those are my settings. Where does THAT fit on your chart?
Is Warhammer Fantasy grimdark?
>>51761770
Sounds like noblebright.
>>51760858
this nigga gets it.
I run high fantasy Grimbright with old school elves, dwarves and stuff. If it isn't human it most likely doesn't think or function like a human, operates on a different scale of morality.
Plus the world's a nice bright happy looking place where everyone's trying to get ahead and push everyone else back.
Also I stole a lot of setting ideas from Steve Jackson's Sorcery. I highly recommend it.
>>51761632
Alright then, can you list a better example for each?
>>51762942
Not him, but Trekshit is quite comfortably noblebright (DS9 notwithstanding), since in spite of each monster-of-the-week the UFP is still a post-scarcity utopia inhabited by hippies with space bullshit magic.
Not OP here, but if everyone is going to bitch about how this chart is shitty, then why don't you post a good one to prove it?