>DMing
>every time the player wants to do something
>"Can I do this?"
>"Am I allowed to do this?"
>"Should I do this?
Just fucking say you're doing it and I'll let you know if its feasible.
>jojofag
>dumb spammy thread
Fuck off, brony-wannabe.
>>51484766
To be honest a lot of the problem I have as GM is when players will just roll the attack check before they even bother trying to take a moment to think of options worthy of asking questions over. Last player who complained about having no options left the game because thy couldn't be damned to ask or even look up basic questions about the combat system when they had the pdf of the freakin manual as well as every damn supplement.
>>51484766
They're just asking questions....
They don't want to commit to something beforehand that's all.
Probs shy or scared of you.
Judging by this, I'm betting on scared of you.
>>51484766
>DMing
There's your problem.
>>51484788
Calm down.
>>51484766
>"Can I do this?"
>"Am I allowed to do this?"
>"Should I do this?"
Sounds like a case of acute 3.PFitis. Or as >>51484982 suggests maybe you're an ass who's overly harsh.
>>51485264
Ay, I've been backed up. Thanks man!
>>51485264
>3.PFitis
?
>>51485755
3.PF can teach players that you can only do what the rules say you can do. For example, a feat that lets you spread rumors implies to players that without that feat you can't spread rumors, or without leadership you can't get a sidekick, etc. In can therefore be described as an overly gamist attitude.
>>51485755
This can be interpreted in many ways anon.
Herpes, arthritis, and so and so forth. Diseased essentially, in the rules understanding.
You must learn the ways of 4chan, new one.