Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: 1462216205402.png (3MB, 4288x2525px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 4288x2525px
Dicepool/Success or Roll+Bonus?
Examples: CofD with the pool of Atribute+Skill with any 7 or greater being a success and, lets say, you need three successes to do something great. While in D&D you roll d20, sum your bonuses and try to hit or pass the value of the challenge.
If you were going to try a new system, with rolling type would you prefer?
inb4 no rolls
>>
>>51466067
No rolls.Roll+bonus
>>
Roll+bonus is fast, simple and objective. Dicepool is slower and too open for interpretation.
What's that from, OP?
>>
File: 1462216616819.png (800KB, 1501x2197px) Image search:
[Google]
800KB, 1501x2197px
>>51467312
Abnor.
It's an ongoing brazillian webcomic that is also available in english.
>>
Roll+bonus, but with FUDGE dice.
>>
>>51467524
This is great! Why don't we all know about this?
>>
>>51468085
I actualy found out about it here a few months ago.
>>
>>51466067
>pizza and ketchup
seriously why though?
that's a like a hamburger with pink slime on it
>>
>>51468085
Because this is an American board?
Like in a board that hardly interacts with America.
>>
>>51466067
Depends on the setting.
No, really. Asking people to choose a dice system without any context is like asking whether they want a wrench or a hammer. The correct answer is: "Well, what am I supposed to do with it?"
I don't care whether it's a dicepool, roll with modifiers, drawing from a tarot deck or speaking Korean into a voice recognition app. What's important is what the system actually does with that mechanic.
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2