can a righteous holy warrior force a unrighteous warrior to keep

>>51447135
Is it really love if you have to force him?

>>51447178
what if the monster love him back?

>>51447372
That means all of jack. It's a two-way street and forcing any of the parties involved into it makes it a shitty situation. No one is entitled to be loved in return just because they love someone. That's genuinely fucked up.

>>51448292
>No one is entitled to be loved in return just because they love someone.
This

>>51447135
>keep his promise to love a monster

Well assuming the unrighteous warrior made the promise at one point or another, this means that either
A- he needs to be more careful with his words
or
B- he did, at one point, love the monster, and has simply forgotten his love.

The righteous warrior's only option is to trick them into a candlelight italian dinner where they will be chained to a lovely little cabaret table and forced to work together to figure out where the key to their chains are hidden.

>the righteous holy warrior will serenade them with a-capella classics such as "I can not help myself, I hath fallen in love with thee" and "Paradise by the Carriage Lamp".
>the key has been taped behind the monster's bottom lip, he can only find it if he goes for tongue

>>51447135
I'm a big believer in contract law. I would hope so.

But the wording of the contract would have to be very specific. Hard to compel someone to feel a certain way.

>>51447135
You can't make them feel whatever but you can seek JUSTICE for vow-breaking.