long story short, i am making a kolbold knight in D&D 3.5

You should start with playing 5e instead.

>>51418480
cant, 3.5 only

>>51418610
You have my condolences.

Use bolas and nets. Consider capturing and incapacitating opponents to be a noble alternative to killing them.

>>51418467
You'll need at least 2 weapons: a Net and a Guisarme.

Guisarme is a reach weapon that can be used for tripping. Nice for reach builds, and even as a Kobold you can make good use of it.
Nets can entangle your enemies. It takes a full round to escape and they get some penalties in the process. It is an exotic weapon, but it targets touch AC so you can use it efficiently without the proficiency.

The "Prehensile Tail" feat lets you use your tail as a grasping hand, so you can either use it for a shield while you wield 2-handed weapons, for 3-weapon fighting or for throwing alchemic items and such. Talk to your GM about the feat, as kobolds are a special case for tailed creatures (they usually have an attack with it, which kobolds lack).

>>51418467
Cool, have fun anon.

>>51418610
>As a Pathfinder

Why 3.5 Only? No Path Finding allowed?

>>51418467
whats a 'kolbold'?

File: Bretonnian Grail Kobold.jpg (208KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1200x1600px

>>51418467
>kobold knight

FOR THE DRAGON LADY!

>>51420884
I'm pretty sure that's 3.PF advice, which is apparently not on the table...

>>51418467
Look into Swordsages. Their maneuvers don't rely on opposed checks, so even your small sized, dex based kobold can use them to trip.