I need a class to fill a d6 random class table. The game is about

>>50991711
Obviously either a Warlord or Diplomat. No social class in "GoT"-inspired game? What?

>>50991744

Yeah, like an inquisitor. Some kind of super useful out of combat class that can just hold his own in a fight.

Maybe Aristocrat or Noble. A couple of pistols with slow reload and a sword with bonuses to finesse and precision in fencing style scenarios like in a great hall or in a clean street, but significant terrain penalties in rough ground or poorly maintained floor areas. This would reflect their training rather than hands on experience.

Major bonuses to information gathering, bludd, diplomacy, disguise, knowledge of history and nobles, connections they can use with safehouses, ability to intimidate lower ranking guards.

>>50991744
Because everyone's probably being a diplomat already

>>50991711
Split Fighter into two classes - the gritty, kick-you-in-the-chest warrior and the refined, castle trained knight aspirant.

OP here.

>>50996522
this. Everyone is expected to do all social parts by roleplay.

Im thinking on making a Doctor class; somehow going beyond simple medicine (psychology, chemistry, biology, hypnotism) But with disciplines that are such that don't overlap with the tinker field (more technological and crafting sciences). I don't know if this is good enough to stand as a class of its own.

>>50996588
That was my original move. But mechanically they were the same; I realized that the only difference would be how to roleplay them. Also I want to reflect that kind of differences on the starting equipment. For example: A fighter gets two of the following at the start:

-A favored weapon type + said weapon (guns, bows, melee, blades, thrown, chain)
-Battle Scars: extra 1d6 HP
-A missing eye: You get to re-roll a die once per combat
-Heavy armor (+2); no penalties when worn.

>>50991860
>Maybe Aristocrat or Noble

This is also a good choice; but I'd prefer to have another: I'm thinking on having them roll on a separate table for background (1d6: how separate from nobility are you? 1 being a peasant, 6 being very close to the throne inheritance). This way, you can be any class and still have any background. You can be a Princess Thief.

We have one in Spain IRL.

>>50999977
>missing eye
>more accuracy
???

>>51002231
is not about accuracy, it represents the wisdom you learnt when you lost the eye due to a bad move.
Yeah, I know, is a very anime thing, but i like it

File: 8825382_orig.jpg (47KB, 417x454px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 417x454px

>>51002231

>>50996588
split "Figther"

"Figther" a specialist in thrown figs, and

"Fagther" who seduces people of the same sex and then slays them with a single anal thrust. he said it was game of thrones so it totally works

>>50999977
>Im thinking on making a Doctor class; somehow going beyond simple medicine (psychology, chemistry, biology, hypnotism) But with disciplines that are such that don't overlap with the tinker field (more technological and crafting sciences). I don't know if this is good enough to stand as a class of its own.

This could work well. Since we're using GoT as a reference, a doctor could be the Qyburn/Pycelle/Luwin to your setting's Melisandre/Thoros, with heavy knowledge in medicines, poisons, and the like.

>>51003914
And since I'm not done spewing GoT names, is the fighter more of a Bronn or a Jaime? Or is Bronn the rogue here?

>>51003943
both are fighers.
bronn probably picked up the battle scars feat, while jamie took the favored weapon.>>50999977

>>51003914
thank you! any advice to make doctors more interesting to play? im thinking on making them more "sages", yeah, just like pycelle

>>51005078
>Pycelle
>Not Luwin

I kid. Kind of. Luwin was actually a bad maester, since he was actually loyal to the Starks, and not just Winterfell.

Anyway, if you're going that route, have them focus on - like I said - medicines and poisons. Apothecary, basically. Rangers can know about what useful things grow where, but doctors know how to use them properly to create things.

Another thing I would do is take healing away from mages, and give it to the doctors. If you're going for low-fantasy, it'd be more fitting for them. For instance, if your party has been banged up, a doctor would be the one to set bones, nurse wounds, etc.

Doctors could also identify poisons as well, which could be a useful mechanic for story purposes. Just some food for thought.