>board game has cards, plus one modifiers, dice, more then two players or units that start either in different areas or uneven amount of unit distribution between teams
>>50878641
>I enjoy casual shit
Fuck off fag
>>50878641
whats wrong with different starting points?
>>50878641
So only symmetrical, deterministic games for two players allowed? That's fine as a preference but, personally, sounds a bit limiting.
>>50878803
Chess is the only good board game since it doesnt allow chance to have a play in the game. All characters do the same moves, can kill one another, and are equal amounts at begining as well as same starting location allowing maximum fairness.
>>50878687
>chess
>casual
>>50878705
Not fair. some locations better than others
Come back when you've eliminated first turn advantage within a single game.
>>50878943
come back when you get good fggt black wins too you just suck guy who came up with the theory couldnt even replicate the situation
Is there a chess variant in which both players move at the same time?
Like, writing down what they'll do and then carrying out the move at the same time?
>>50880348
10/10, would play
>>50880348
Now there is
>>50880348
I'd watch that. Shit would be tense.
>>50880348
You'd have to work out what happens in certain cases.
What if both pieces moving land on the same spot, for a start.
>>50880348
>both players plan out their strategies
>an A.I simulates the game in real time
Hmm...
>>50880962
A. Rank system where the piece with a higher rank takes the other piece and the spot
B. They take each other and no one gets the spot.
>>50880348
You can do something like this in lichess by having blacks pre-move their pieces, but it's obviosly not designed for this.
It would have some interesting ramifications for checkmating.
>>50880348
Congratulations /tg/, you just improved a several thousand year old "perfect" game.
>>50878641
>not liking asymmetric games
Lol pleb
>>50878911
>>chess
>>casual
Chess is so fucking casual, chess masters get into checkers to have a challange for once.
>>50880962
>You'd have to work out what happens in certain cases.
>What if both pieces moving land on the same spot, for a start.
I assume it would be like the board game in star wars where the pieces rassle to the death in a quick mini-game
>>50878911
>Chess is the only good board game since it doesnt allow chance to have a play in the game.
>chess is the only abstract strategy game
Go is also completely luck-independent AND humans can still beat computers.
>>50878641
>playing warmahordes
>armies are asymmetrical in every way
>newfriend wants to make board symmetrical
>this makes it even
thats not how it works you little fucking piece shit.