How do we turn diseases into a collectible game? The potential

>>50694662

Well, we'd need somewhere or something to safely store it and carry it around, with the possibility of exchange.

Maybe lab grown tissues in a freezer? Silicon beakers?

But I dunno, I doubt it would be easily collectible. It would be as hard to collect as weapons, since they are considered life threathning.

>>50694763

I was thinking we could use innocuous diseases at first until people get used to the idea.

>>50694924
You first.

>>50694924

Viruses mutate to fast. Also I think the medical community would get so againist it, because if one of the bacterias mutate, turn into an acutal disease, spreads and we have to use antibiotics, we'll accelerate even more the imminent loss of effectiveness they are already going through.

We need living beings that are small enough to carry around and easily manageable, but also interesting to collect. Like that miniature zoo from Spy Kids 2.

File: Family-Guy-Season-9-Episode-4-2-900a.jpg (62KB, 848x480px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 848x480px

Remember that every game still has powergamers.
Plan accordingly.

>>50694992
>Viruses mutate too fast in vitro so we have to give them a living host
Anon, you've been watching too many shitty sci-fi movies. Viruses are incapable of reproducing on their own, and therefore incapable of mutating on their own. Also, they don't mutate nearly as often as you think they do. That's why you get a flu shot every year and not every week.

File: Gotta_catch_them_all.png (197KB, 1600x342px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 1600x342px

>>50694662
>How do we turn diseases into a collectible game?
Start with the pokemon slogan

>>50695996
ah, perhaps each disease/card comes with its own way of easily defeating duplicates of itself. therefor, to be the very best you would need to collect them all.