How do you deal with sex in your games, /tg/? At some point

>>50494138
Adding further, what do you do if another player is attempting to seduce your character?

Fade to black.

>>50494138
>At some point it will inevitably come up.

Nope. We've got 3 Mormons in our group of six, and one of them is the GM. It doesn't come up.

>>50494138
Depends on the group

>>50494138
From a GM perspective you need to go over this with your group at session 0 to determine how comfortable everyone is with sexual situations happening. And as far as player's seducing other PCs, make them RP it. No dice. Just dialogue between the two players. You'll find this usually discourages that kind of behaviour.

>>50494173
Care to elaborate?

>>50494151
Mormons built a religion purely to justify having sex with multiple under age women.

>>50494138
Play F.A.T.A.L., it takes care of everything.

>>50494138
Fade to black or make the people rp it out if its me and my wife then we larp

>>50494138
Every single one is fade to black.
If a player tries to break the sacred fade-to-black I (and often other players) just stare at them with 'dude, what the fuck?' looks on our faces until he backs down.

>>50494237
No, you're thinking of the offshoots of mormons, like the RLDS church. Mormons only practiced polygamy when they were outside the states, and that was so they wouldn't all die off.

Most of the sexual content in a group i'm running comes up in combat as innuendo. Last session there was a BDSM succubus and we were all cracking up about how she was moaning when she was getting hit with a whip that our tall dark fighter had.

Another session had satyrs who were frenzied and had raging erections, druid rolled a 2 on perception. "All you can perceive is the frantic swaying of the erect satyr's member from left to right"

As for actual sex, fade to black is the one. If you have a party member who wants to describe in detail what they do an NPC, purge them.

>>50494138
I put a porn clip on screen.

>>50494138
Describe everything as detailed as possible, encouraging players to touch themselves and mimic their character's voices as much as possible.
... Is what you're expecting to hear, OP? No, really, there isn't anyone who would handle it differently from FtB unless they were playing FATAL or BoEF in the first place.

>>50494146
Depends on the character attempting to seduce and the character being seduced.

Fully roleplayed but must be screamed at the top of your lungs if not it doesn't happen.

>>50494138
Fully role-played, but while wearing a ball gag.

>>50494667
Thank is for correcting the record, .5 native American jesus coins have been deposited in your account

However as they, like your religion, are backed by a fucking con artist they have no value as us legal tender. Sorry.

>>50494138
I run games online with other perverts, so the answer is cybersex.

>>50494138
Sex in game has to be performed live. The players have to play the girl while the DM takes the role of the guy.

File: orc and elf gay.jpg (109KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1024x576px

>>50495118
What about gay sex.

>>50494667

Sorry, thats a lie, they were never in danger of dying off and had groups large enough that lical governments feared their population could dominate voting blocs. Which is exactly what scam artist PRESIDENT Smith was aiming for. And after threatening a judge who called him out on it he skipped town with everyone's bank money.

Also tell your DM that if he wants some better inspiration for his BBEG, try actually reading his Doctrines and Covenants book, especially the part where it said the civil war would become a world war, or the part about the entire US would be destroyed down to potsherds within 3 years. OR 2nd coming christ appearing by the year 1900.

Excellent advice on how evil overlords manipulate their minions.

>>50494138
Shubb-Niggurath pls

>>50494191
well i like it, on the occasions whem i'm highly immersive with my character and the GM is too is fun. A great way to get to know an NPC is by flirting with her.

"You spend the night together"

Leaves it up to interpretation whether or not uglies were bumped. Sex is not the focus in games I run so there's never relly any need to play it past that.

The really important question is : dexterity or charisma roll?

>>50494191
>And as far as player's seducing other PCs, make them RP it. No dice. Just dialogue between the two players. You'll find this usually discourages that kind of behaviour.
As a fellow GM, a non-intervention policy is possibly one of the absolute worst things to suggest to anyone. It invites awkward encounters between players and if you're running a session with people who aren't familiar with each other at the table then you're, at best, inviting disaster to your campaign. At worst, possibly sexual harassment claims.

File: 1447205014679.png (591KB, 900x850px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 900x850px

>>50494138
>At some point it will inevitably come up.
That really depends on your system though

>>50498676
a complex equation using all stats and virtually all skills

>>50498676
Strength, obviously

File: TFOS Sex.png (229KB, 1542x3532px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1542x3532px

>>50494138
Fade to black. Unless they insist on roleplaying it, at which point I take advice from TFOS.

>>50494138
>>50494138
I always play as females and play chicken with the DM because I don't initiate sex, and the DM knows damn well that rape is my fetish.

one of these days I'm going to have a super interesting session.

File: ahKjbEG.jpg (54KB, 450x337px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 450x337px

>>50495271
s-source?

>>50494138
We roll opposed toughness to check performance

>>50499193
This reminds me of something I read.

If a movie depicts a young teenager getting raped, it's "drama". If it depicts two young teenagers in a consensual sexual relationship, it's filth and sparks riots in the streets. Ergo; it's more acceptable to depict kids getting raped than in normal relationships.

File: 1452021897515.jpg (12KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 259x194px

>>50494138
If by "it will inevitable come up" you mean "eventually the heroes will finish a great quest and return to their home town to a parade and lots of pretty women", that's when I skip to the next day so fade to black.

If you meant to imply eventually you will have to add a sex encounter, no I don't. No GM should unless it was an ERP at the start.

why is it such an unconfortable topic anyways? its all constructed by society, isn't it?

I mean, we can describe in detail how we want to kill our opponent (important: Take life) but we can't describe how we bone? (important: make life) ?

>>50494138
Fade to black and a skill roll

>>50499867
We've made sex an extremely private and personal thing, while we have done no such thing with murder.

>>50499867
Allow me to break it down for you.

It violates social convention. This means it makes people uncomfortable. Accepting and following social convention is what makes you normal. Defying it makes you bizarre. Defying it in this way (descriptions of imaginary sex, most likely graphic, and most likely amongst members of the same sex) makes you a fucking loser.

These are the truths and I have said them.

>>50500022
>Defying it in this way (descriptions of imaginary sex, most likely graphic, and most likely amongst members of the same sex) makes you a fucking loser.
Yes. Because it's trying to shortcut around actually having to deal with the social convention proper. And very flatly failing to, mind you.

Plus, imaginary sex implies a lack of getting real sex, and a lack of which is for fucking losers.

>>50500098
t. whore

>>50494138
I was not in the group at the time, but my current group had two player characters get married by a Dwarven priest of a god none of them worshiped. After the wedding, they consummated upon the most holy site of the Dwarves. In the end, they ended up finishing all over the crown of the first Dwarven king. This was during their first campaign, I joined after this campaign. They say that this was the most interesting campaign cause they did not know the rules of it and the players went rampant

There are other stories from this campaign, not in the same way as this. Such as;
>The Market Place Fiasco
>How the party Barbarian Half-Orc, Eggroll, defeated an the avatar of Pelor by breaking him over the knee
>Killing Thor
>Using a wish to get a giga-city and named it "Glenn"
>Dying in a Christmas special flashback
>Guillermo, the gnome sorcerer, using an overpowered hombrew school of magic known as Sanguimancy to kill a T-Rex
>The Fight for Glenn

>>50500127
These are only some of the crazy things that happened, there are many more of course, that's if everyone is interested in hearing about them.

>>50494237
On that note, I think my PC might be inventing fantasy Mormonism

>>50494667
Oh, my mistake.
Mormons built a religion purely to introduce multi-level marketing to the world.

>>50498676
Intelligence do you remember where your older brother told you the G-spot is

>>50500127
>>50500176
I need to hear all of those stories, including the very first, in chronological order

>>50494138
Depends on the group and game.

>>50494200
If it's an ERP game/group, then it happens.
If not, nobody goes near.

>>50501655
Does it really need to be those two extremes?

>>50500098
Or you're into things that are impossible socially or physically

>>50494138
Depends on the group, but I like to have some pithy one-line deal if there's not going to be much detail. To keep it interesting, so it's not instant boredom each time.

Things like "she gets pushed into the wall and squeals cutely".
Or "flesh-slapping sounds are heard from the tend until first light".

My games are usually with non-prudes, so avoiding sex is just due to an interest in doing other things, not for a special aversion.

>>50501808
Interest in erotic or sexy fantasies does not imply a lack of real-life sex. It's a flavorful addition, not a replacement. So he's just straight wrong.

>>50501755
No. Like I mentioned >>50501879, if your group is comfortable, you can do quick scenes to 'flesh out' the setting, and keep the tone right.

"Alright, you jam your penis into her, and she moans loud and low like a wanton cow. Meanwhile <ranger> is scouting the north perimeter and finds X."

>>50494138
One of my cyborg PC's recently accidentaly created an AI by having sex with a fridge, so pretty casually i would say.

It never comes up really. But if it does I mandate that the player describe whether it involves vigorous thrusting or is soft and tender. Going detail is stupid, but avoiding it is just wasted opportunity.

>>50494138
My standing rule at my table is that if two PCs have sex in the game, or if a PC has sex with an NPC, then the players themselves also have to fuck, or the player and DM respectively.

Cut down on that shit right quick.

I mean except for Greg and Tom but they ended up moving in together.

File: 1448550767586.jpg (26KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 600x375px

>>50494138
Same as with >>50501655

If the group is cool with lewds, play it out (in text games), otherwise stay away and fade to black if it comes up.

>>50494146
In my non-lewd games it's
>my barbarian hits the guy hitting on him/tells her to knock it off, that they should keep it professional between them
>my druid turns them down without skipping a beat
>my warrior looks at the guy/girl puzzled and then glares at them, telling them that he doesn't appreciate them pulling his leg, as he is horribly disfigured and figures no one would ever be attracted to him.
>my fighter turns their advances down

>>50500121
oh /pol/

>>50494138
>How do you deal with sex in your games, /tg/?

We fuck on the table...in character.

>>50503327
Learn2meme

>>50494138
With consequences. Last PC who get laid has a unwanted baby on the way. The fun part is that he is the father, and the mother could and would pursue him to the end of the world so he can take care of said baby.

>>50498676
Athletics, of course

>>50494138
You know it's not a big deal but it always annoys me my DM makes NPCs do a opposed charisma check when ever a player tries to seduce seduction an NPC, because why is there an assumption people are naturally going to be opposed to sex, yes even in the Middle Ages.

I'm not gonna go full Tumblr and complaining how it represents outdated sexual morals but it just bugs me.

>>50500176
I don't need the full story, but these short blurbs are gold.

>>50494138
>Play an ultra-social-conservative Investigator (No sex after marriage, no cross-species romance, bla bla bla)
>NPCs right left and centre try to seduce him

>>50504342
>No sex after marriage,
So sex before marriage is fine?

It's glossed over like anything else that isn't important

>>50504740
>Marriage now doesn't exist in this fantasy setting.

Try to stay chaste now, Investigator!

>>50504108
>makes NPCs do a opposed charisma check
That should only happen if they're both trying to seduce the other

>>50494667
>>50494237
>>50494151

This is literally the 6th time I read about Mormons on 4chan all week. Twice on /tg/, twice on /fit/, once on /tv/, and once again right freaking now. What is going on here? Did Utah finally get internet after all those years?

>>50506924

Don't worry, a few more decades and there'll be so many more women than men that no one will care anymore.

>>50494138
As a type of combat.

>>50501190
I hope you can excuse me, but I am typing this as I go, I do not have them pre-written.
>How they killed the king in the first few minutes
The campaign started off with all of the players knowing each other and begin on a road. Our players included: Arland- the Dwarf Fighter. Eggroll- the Barbarian Half Orc, Guillermo - the Gnome Sorcerer, & Ermias - The Female Human Rogue. As they came upon a farmer on a wagon, their first instinct was to make sure he was put into the ground. Turns out that farmer was the king in disguise because he is being hunted down by assassins. He couldn't have expected the blood thirsty fury that is players finding out they have complete freedom in a game for the first time.

>Cont. to the Marketplace Fiasco

>>50508080
>The Market Place Fiasco
A true testament to poor dice rolls and shit getting out of hand quick.

As the group entered back town after a fine battle with an unsuspecting farmer, both Eggroll and Arland decide that they need better equipment. Thing is, they were poor as sin. Luckily though, they have a rogue on their side. The group sends Ermias to nab some armor for them at the marketplace. Meanwhile, Eggroll would provide the distraction. Thing is, Eggroll started to panic and resorted to attacking the innocuous merchant. What he didn't expect was a surprise critical hit to his knee from a dagger knocking him near unconsciousness. Things were not looking good. Thankfully, Guillermo used Ghost Sound to help give him the upper hand.
"City Watch, drop your weapons!"
Of course the commoner obeyed, and then Eggroll tore the guy's dagger out of his knee and used it to slit the guy's throat. Eventually, the real city watch were called in to intervene. Then I can't quite recall, but I believe at one point someone kicked over a food cart and yelled something along the lines of "SCATTER!" before running away

>Cont. to Killing Thor

>>50505322
If they are both trying to seduce each other they should just have sex.

At most should be an insight check to see if they picked up on your advances. Vances

>>50508499
>If they are both trying to seduce each other they should just have sex
But then they can't determine who wins at romance.

The one who is confessed to is the one who holds all power in the relationship, after all.

>>50508280
>Killing Thor
After clearing out Arland's ancestral tomb of his forefathers. They had more gold than god. This is after the consummation of Guillermo's and Ermias' wedding. So the DM came up with a planar traveling sales merchant named Flizdam. This was the DM's answer to drain their funds by selling them unique artifacts. Such as Thor's Hammer, the Deck of Many Things, and the Spike of Atropos, it was used to nail Jesus to the cross and had the potential of trapping anything within it.

When they bought Mjolnir, it was placed within a magically sealed case so Thor could not discern it's location. Arland gets the bright idea to remove it from it's case. Surprise... he can't carry it and it's seal was destroyed. Thor, being righteously pissed about having lost his hammer and now having it's link reconnected. Teleported to the group and demands for Mjolnir. The party wholeheartedly refused, thus combat with a deity began. The battle itself was rough on the party as they were getting their shit pushed in by a god. Just because he does not have his signature weapon, doesn't mean he's any less of a god that can make you his bitch with his fists. A single hit was able to knock Arland down to single digits and he withdrew from the fight. Guillermo on the other hand was continuously summoning Adolf, the Dire Hippo in the air and dropping him onto Thor. The cycle of life and death continued for poor Adolf. Each time, it's telepathically say to Guillermo, "Master, no" in a sad low hippo-y voice.

This is where we suffer the second party member death. Realizing that the gnome is summoning the Hippo and causing grievous injuries to him, Thor decided to beeline towards Guillermo and unleash the fury of a god upon his frail old body. I forgot to mention that Guillermo is of venerable age and is staying alive purely by a massive amount of drugs keeping his heart pumping. On Arland's turn, he ran up and stabbed Thor with the Spike, killing Thor and getting Mjolnir.

>>50508625
The first death was when Eggroll got the Deck of Many Things and pulled the Death Card. Eggroll's enemy was the Grim Reaper himself. The battle itself wasn't long and Death literally just breathed death into him, failing his save, Eggroll is dead, for now. They eventually brought him back to life.

>>50508613
>Nobody wins

It's a boring answer but it really does depend on the needs of the group. Table rules should be established at the start of a campaign about what should or should not be off limits for the game. Second, some groups think sex and sexuality is amusing and that's fine and that's how it should be used if they like that. I think sex needs to always be consensual from the perspective of the PCs, so I never have NPCs 'roll to seduce them' or whatever - I just say, 'he's trying to seduce you' after some IC statements and let the player make their own choice.

I also like it when sex changes things. People have meaningless sex all the time in the real world, and some groups are fine with that in game, but since I tend to think sex as the development of a relationship when we're talking about the units of a story, things should be different after sex than they were before.

Always fade to black.

Roll sex appeal, fade to black, roll Erotic Art, deal with aftermath. I have never actually had to do this.

>>50506924
Mormons hit mainstream in the last decade or so and people are more closely scrutinizing the coven they have set up in Utah.

>>50508700
I liked your storytime

>>50509059
>whoever fucks, we lose

>>50494138
What about sex in self defense tho?

>>50494138
You act it out on the table while everyone else watches.

>>50498723
depends again. If you have party where they aren't best buddies, roll through it
If they know eachother for years though, roleplay is better

File: namemymove.jpg (57KB, 540x356px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 540x356px

>>50512803

>You'll not find me easy prey, brigand!

>>50494138
Poorly

>>50494146
Politely decline. Our crusade against Evil leaves no time for responsible parenting.

>>50498676
Wisdom

File: never let tg do your dyi project.png (39KB, 1580x320px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1580x320px

>>50506924
A fa/tg/uy consecrated a Mormon temple to the chaos gods once.

>>50513685
You always roll Int for sex, silly.

>>50506981
Women mostly stay on facebook, twitter, instagram and their like

>>50494979
underrated post

>>50513882
He probably meant that it would be silly to dislike polygamy if the ratio of women to men was significantly higher. Which is a present population trend.

Or that people won't care as much about religion in the next few decades. Who knows?

>>50494149
This. PG-13 is best rating.

Even better if there's even no fade to black, just implications and subtle hints. Takes a well-adjusted group, though.

>>50494146
Smoke bomb, Withdraw, Stealth, Years of Stalking.

File: bloodybonesfin.jpg (122KB, 467x640px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 467x640px

>>50494138
It came up for the fist time last week and it almost ended the game.
You see, we have a house rule of "you say it, you do it". Basically if you joke about doing something your character does it instantly, this is to stop people from going off on tangents of "lol, wouldn't it be funny if this happened"

So the characters we're in an abandoned temple full of statues, A dragon born paladin and two female sorcerers.
The paladin says "I fuck the statues" meaning "I break the statues" one of the other players (lets call her girl A) pipes up. "House rule, that means you have sex with it!"
So everyone decides that the paladin literally humped a statue. The Paladin wasn't happy.

Later the party fought a dragon, On her turn Girl A says, "I'm going to fuck up that dragon." Instantly the paladin chimes in. "that means she has sex with it! It's only fair." Girl B agreed and started shouting "suck its dick!" So I said "you attempt to fuck the dragon, roll to suck dick"
Girl A refuses to roll, before I can say anything else, Girl B rolls a dice and shouts "Natural 20, I suck a mean dick!"

So I go with it and say "You suck a mean dick while your fellow sorcerer refuses to act, I can see now why she's single"

Girl A, jumps up from her seat and threatens to leave, we would have let her go but she had the players hand book under her arm.

She came back but the mood was ruined for the rest of the evening.

>>50515581
There's a lesson for Girl A. If you come play:
You play for keeps.

Girl B a best though.

>>50494138
I had played a ninja (based on ezio auditore) once when I was still pretty new to pathfinder, and him being a bro made a couple of opportunities for him to seduce a couple of shopkeeps and the daughter of the mayor.

She ended up being murdered, and I was a suspect until they found the weapon was a bigass axe, which I clearly don't use

Very cheese name and plot. I've since gotten more serious with the names and backgrounds

>>50494716
Thats kind of weird to have in game, but I guess it's the tone of your campaing, as long as you are having fun

>>50515581
That paladin needs to learn the difference between "fuck" and "fuck up"

Girl B sounds like a laugh though

>>50494138
>How do you deal with sex in your games, /tg/?

Baseline is that you can last 5 minutes for Constitution 10. You can last an additional minute for each point of Constitution bonus (6 minutes at 12, 7 minutes at 14, etc). Past this point, you make Constitution checks every minute; the base DC is 10 and it increases by 1 every minute thereafter.

If your goal is strictly pleasing your partner without concern for your own orgasm, you can substitute your Charisma check for your partner's Constitution check to make them last longer then their baseline, but make no progress towards orgasm yourself.

You can orgasm a number of times per hour equal to your Constitution modifier with no ill effects. Each orgasm after this, however, imposes one level of exhaustion.

You have Advantage on Charisma-based checks you make for the next week if you have brought that person to orgasm.

However, If you have sex with someone, orgasm, they don't, and you do nothing to remedy this (i.e., start making those Charisma checks I mentioned), you have Disadvantage on Charisma-based checks with them for the next week.

This applies only if the sex was consensual. You always have Disadvantage on Charisma-based skill checks against someone you have raped, no matter how many times they orgasm (if at all).

For the sake of simplicity, only the PC rolls to see if pregnancy occurs (if male, to see if they've impregnated a female; if female, to see if they've been impregnated).

The base is a 50% chance, modified upwards or downwards by 5% for each point of Constitution score (not modifier) you have above or below 10. So, someone with a 12 Constitution has a 60% chance of impregnation/being impregnated.

Roll a d20. On a 1-9, the fetus is female; on a 10-18, the fetus is male. On a 19-20, there are twins; roll a d20 twice again to determine each of the twins' genders, ignoring and re-rolling subsequent results of 18-20 unless the DM decides to allow triplets or more.

>>50494146
deal with it in character, always fade to black

if it gets too weird, tell them

>>50494138
It comes up as often as menstruation does. So no it does not come up at all.

>>50516036
>He doesn't have used tampons on his loot table.
Wow get a load of this jabroni

>>50515872
>Girl B sounds like a laugh though
Requesting more Girl B stories.
Girl A's shit.

>>50494138
I don't see why it has to inevitably come up?

>>50515964
>The base is a 50% chance, modified upwards or downwards by 5% for each point of Constitution score (not modifier) you have above or below 10. So, someone with a 12 Constitution has a 60% chance of impregnation/being impregnated.
Anon that seems high as shit. Murder hobos don't want kiddos

>>50516098
kek

>>50516186
Well, since the birds and the bees and the humans all live in a world where hot fucking happens constantly:

Unless you're actively attempting to remove sexual references from any and all facets of the roleplaying world, it will implicitly be there.

>>50516206
Maybe in an ERP game.

>>50516036
>he's never caved a menstruating orc babebarian
Consider yourself blessed

>>50494138
>playing engine hearts
>sex will inevitably come up

HOW?!

>>50516288
How does it make you feel to know that flies can be having hot, steamy sex all over your general area?

>>50516206

The same applies to real life though. Do you walk into the office every day like "hey guys I sure could use some hot dicking right now ha ha hey? how about you? h-ha ha..."

Just deal with it however you normally would deal with the topic of sex when surrounded by sweaty neckbeards who have never engaged in it and just want to be the little girl (ie. avoid the topic). If your neckbeard insists on fucking his anime pillow (NPC) then do what you normally would and fade to black then try not to think about it.

File: Angry Joe killed by ISIS.jpg (68KB, 645x367px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 645x367px

>>50494138
I mean, as opposed to what, describing the sex in detail? It's just a thing that happens, there's no point lingering on the subject.

>>50513717
That's bizarre. I'm an electrician too, I started leaving little magazine cutouts of Mike Pence in all of my customers' fuse boxes. I think we all do stuff like that.

>>50516321
>Do you walk into the office every day like "hey guys I sure could use some hot dicking right now ha ha hey? how about you? h-ha ha..."

Well actually, I neither work nor play with prudes. So stuff like that is much more common. "Move like a greased loli, Anon."

>>50515964
>15 constitution means 100% chance of impregnation

>>50494138
Yes, but with my group, it's only ever done for laughs. That time we did a Dragonlance campaign, one of our PCs was a Kender whom a prostitute tricked into buying 'a kender ride'.

He later came running down the stairs screaming, bless his childish Kender heart.

The other incident involved my NE Elf character, a joke that got a little out of hand, and a donkey.

No awkward details or magical realm shit in either case. Plenty of dirty jokes, but arousal isn't exactly one of our priorities in DnD.

>>50516578
>The other incident involved my NE Elf character, a joke that got a little out of hand, and a donkey.
I require clarification

>>50506924
Nah, you just merely haven't noticed before now. Mormons tend to be a punchline in many jokes, especially if harems are involved. They played a role in the Fallout Series, so they were often discussed on /v/ when New Vegas came out. They pop up in conversation now and then in /k/ thanks to the genius that is Browning. Dogs in the Vineyard is heavily inspired by Mormons, so definitely /tg/ territory, even without factoring in how everything inevitably becomes relevant in /tg/ topics. Heck where were you back during the 'Magnets how do they work?' meme days when /b/ would raid various Mormon sites and ask them?

Mormons are the mainstream 'weirdo' religion that everyone knows of, but know nothing about and thus it is totally cool to talk about them.

>>50517378
Don't forget South Park has poked fun at them in multiple episodes

>>50517518
Yeah, and that was what? I think that was early 2000's when i first saw something mormon related on south park. South Park makes fun of everything under the sun.

Fade to black, but if they push it I start making weird shit happen.

>>Me:Okay, you take her up to your room and fuck her brains out.

>>Them:How sexily does she undress?

>>Me: not important

>>Them: yes it is! How well does she dance?

>>She puts on a little dance, her breasts jiggling's all the while, but she has trouble getting her dress over her 10 foot giraffe like neck. However, her 16 nipples shudder with anticipation as they stretch across the room and caress your cheek.

>>50494138
fade to black mostly. i don't like roleplaying seducers or seduced people so i mostly keep stuff like succubi out of my campaigns, i've got nothing against the monster.

>>50494138
I make my players describe in great detail on what they do, and to be as descriptive in possible, hopefully embarrassing them from having sex in game again.

>>50516725
Well, we running this all-evil characters Forgotten Realms campaign, and my character was a Shar worshipping Elf who was also a shadow conjourer or somesuch (memory's a bit foggy). The other party members included a Tiefling who was anal about being a Tiefling, a Chaotic Evil Aasimar, and a human character whom I barely remember.

My point is, the other characters were dicks. My elf was a dick, too, but that's beside the point for now.

So we were in an inn at one point, and none of us was willing to pay for more than a single room. Then the night came, and my elf was coming to regret sharing a room with two raving sociopaths and a literal piece of hellspawn.

"You know what? Screw you guys, I'm going to sleep in the stable"

"Enjoy your straw and donkey shit, lol"

"The donkey is better company than you. As are the rats and the bucket of shit in the corner"

*the other three raving lunatics then go back to viciously mocking eachother*

"...things would be so much better if they were just a little more like you, donkey"

^Now, in-character, I actually meant that line to mean something like "at least you don't talk" - but the other guys took it a very different way. And then the DM promptly said "OK, you sleep in the stable with the donkey".

...and then I just gave up trying to rescue the tattered remains of my character's dignity. Let's just say that the Very Special Donkey became a recurring topic after that...

At least I can say that, in spite of everything, my Elf remained true to his race's nature-loving ways.

>>50513685
if people rolled for wisdom, 90% of sexual encounters wouldn't happen.

>>50518213
That's kind of silly. Did he die for one failed save solely because he chose to have sex?

>>50494138
Drop genital eating mimics on them until they get the hint.

>>50517888
Anal tieflings are the best kind.

>>50499385
>If it depicts two young teenagers in a consensual sexual relationship, it's filth and sparks riots in the streets.
When we this written? 1954?

>>50518394
If you have non-simulated sex in a movie, you'll get shit-reviewed and run out of Hollywood.

Date: 2016

>>50494138
>Fade to black?
Fuck no, you roll that shit.
If male
>Roll 1d10+ races' constitution bonus (so dwarves get +2, half orcs get +1) the first time you have sex, this is your dick length in inches
>Constitution check to see how long you last in bed and if the sex is any good
>If she is a whore constitution check to see if you catch anything
>In secret I roll a d10, on a 10 your partner gets pregnant, roll 3d20, for each additional 20 she has another kid (so if she rolls 1 20 she will have twins)

If female
>Constitution check to see how long you last in bed and if the sex is any good
>If he is a whore constitution check to see if you catch anything
>In secret I roll a d10, on a 10 you get pregnant, roll 3d20, for each additional 20 have another kid

As for roleplaying I just move on and tell you to imagine it in your head if you want.

>>50518267
If you're going around picking up random whores in the 40k universe, you deserve to die choking on some sort of Slaaneshi bullshit, because you're too stupid to live

>>50519031
>picking up random whores in the 40k universe
But Anon, this is literally what every hiver does.

Fucking pureblood humans isn't chaos anything.

>>50518454
>>50518394
>>50499385
It makes perfect sense when yo look at it from this perspective

They are teens, other teens may latch onto them as role models or something. What wold parents and other adlults much prefer when it comes to teenage relationships? That they don't have sex and risk screwing up their lives with accidental babies.

Rape is not something normal people want, ergo it is fine to display rape. But show them in a loving consensual relationship with no repurcussions then you could potentially risk making sex look like something that must be done in a relationship at any age or stage of the relationship.

Now wether or not any of this actually does anything in the long rrun is an entirely different argument. Personally I feel they aren't doing too well considering how more and more living together like you were married despite being boy/girlfriends for only a month is becoming perfectly normal.

>>50518464
Can I add proficiency bonus to a check? Do I have to be proficient in sex? What classes/background options gets this as their basic proficiency?
Can I take 10 on a test?

Why CON?
Shouldn't it be tied to something else?
I'm sure high INT wizard can figure out fun things that do not depend on CON.
High WIS can also be useful to finding partner's erogenous zones (after all it's a stat for medical things)
DEX sounds like a good thing.
CHA characters could do wonders in area of ambient mood.
I'm having trouble with STR, but given enough time someone could find a way how to make use of it.

Do bards get a bonus? Seduction seems like a class feature.
As this is check and I can fail it and suffer consequences, do I get exp for successful completion of a challenge?

If you want to design a system, design it completely.

Spell compendium, list of magic item, prestige classes when?

>Alright man, roll to fuck your wife.
>14
>Sorry man, not high enough. No baby. Anyway, you set out again the next morning...

>>50519219
Responsible wizards start by casting Shield and Grease. Kinky wizards have access to a variety of touch spells. They do fine.

>>50494151
Dude, Mormons are superfreaks. They're probably having an orgy every game night after you leave.

>>50501163
It must be in the butt because every time I stick my fingers in it the girl cums.

>>50516197
>Murder hobos don't want kiddos

Then maybe you shouldn't be having unprotected sex.

>>50516488
Yup.