> PCs can never die permamently Can you still make an interesting

You act as if death is the only "real danger."

You just put in different stakes.

Even in the videogame there are implications of insanity.

If they were all immortal, I'd have a way for death to take something away each time. Start out minor, but builds up.

Getting dismembered and body parts spread across multiple location still makes the PC useless.
So does being buried "alive".
Attribute drain can be nasty too. Good luck accomplishing anything with 3s across the board.
Another point to note is mental health. Both raving lunacy and heartbroken catatonia are very much a bad end.

>>50042900
>Can you still make an interesting campaign out of this? What's at stakes, if player characters are never in real danger?

You just posted a game that handles this perfectly.

You're technically immortal, but the world is not.

Imagine if you could never truly die. You come back, again and again.
Imagine being trapped somewhere. You don't die, you're just...stuck. Imagine that happening to you mentally. Stuck in the same rut. Imagine you become sick, but you don't get free from this accursed sickness, even when you die and come back.
There's many ways to scare the undying, pain for an eternity is always a favorite.

>>50042900
Make it bright instead of dark. PCs are mythic heroes from an ancient age dealing with equally powerful foes.

>>50042900
You fall down a glacial crack, landing headfirst with your neck at a horrible angle. Wedged. Suffocating. Freezing. Forever.

>>50042900
>>50042981
Alternatively make it about cooking or something not combat related.
Being defeated in a culinary cook-off is a fate worse than death.

>>50042900
Dying causes them to respawn in a specific location? Even if death doesn't cost them anything mechanically it's cost them time and distance. You can still lose the campaign if your goal was to stop the evil wizard from destroying the world and you just got bumped from the top of his tower down to the city a dozen miles away.

>>50042900
I run a MonsterHearts campaign and in that system player characters are extremely difficult to kill, you can essentially 'die' three times per session before your character is actually killed off and the games social focus means that there usually isn't enough violence happening that they will die three times in one session. That said being killed in MonsterHearts still causes problems, other than dying when a character reaches zero hp they have two other options; lose all their strings or enter their darkest self.

Losing all your strings sucks because you are more or less at the bottom of the social dogpile, most other characters can outclass you so you either have to play smart and gain your advantages elsewhere or you go low-key for a bit while you build back up (harder than it sounds).

Going darkest self also kind of sucks because you essentially lose some of your character autonomy for a while, you have to single-mindedly pursue a certain goal and it will usually be a while before you get control back.

So I suppose the answer is to make losing a fight seriously suck in a way that doesn't involve losing your character entirely.

>>50042923
This.
There are worse things than death

File: 4e22444c626e1d89d105a4c961cab536.jpg (980KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 2560x1440px

>Do you really think time would stand still in the event of your death?

File: e86783b8059156396a2423f950437121.jpg (10KB, 236x184px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 236x184px

Your phylactery is also your charmingly annoying companion and tool.

If it's destroyed your pseudo immortality is taken from you as well as losing your constant companion.

>>50042900
You kill their money and exp. Don't take away levels they've already gained, but instead strip away the exp they have from one level to the next. Money is simple, they lose all of it upon death, and regain it when they encounter the spot they had died at. Alternatively, they could overcome whatever had killed them, or resolve the encounter without fighting, with the npc acting as though they had never met. The latter acts as a groundhog day scenario.

File: Mortal Wounds Table.png (165KB, 832x567px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 832x567px

>>50042900
>can never die permanently = no stakes or danger

You need some permanent injuries in your gaming experience. Every time someone reach zero hitpoints from damage, roll on a good injury table (pic related is my favorite). It's a fine way to make players dread hitting zero, even if their characters don't necessarily die.

>>50042900
In Dark Souls, repeated deaths lead to a given undead gradually forgetting themselves and their past, and going Hollow.

In RPG terms, dying causes SAN loss.

>>50043014

I liked the way it was done in Phoenix: Dawn Command. (not the same thing as Phoenix Command) When you die, you come back at one of the sacred fires -- the first one is in the mountain over the city, but others exist in the world and just need someone to relight them, and then the Phoenixes can step into one and out any other.
You also gain some improvement based on how you were killed, so dying makes you stronger, until you've reached the ancient treaty's limit, when you're not supposed to return any more. So you have limited lives, but spending them can help you achieve goals and grow stronger, so it's always tempting to sacrifice yourself to help the party.

just give them goals that don't hinge on whether or not they die.
or raise the stakes

File: destiny-32265-400x250.jpg (33KB, 400x250px)

33KB, 400x250px

>>50043094
I unironically found this concept to be the best part of that game.

>>50042900
Death is one of the least interesting penalties you can apply to a character, most of the time.

So yeah, you can totally make an interesting campaign out of this.

File: Magenta.png (349KB, 541x283px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 541x283px

>>50042980
Eventually you'd stop thinking.

>>50044502
They dont make enough of the fact your playing a constantly ressurecting warrior in service of a possibly dying alien god to protect a nearly eradicated humanity.

They dont make enough of the lore in general.

>>50044602
Very true.

remember when they had a slice of lore dedicated to the idea that some guardians flat-out didn't want to come back and fight for humanity? remember when they wanted to go back?

Too bad all of the potential is wasted.

>>50042900
Making EXP linked to money and making the money something besides coins that get lost if you die...you know...like in the game you are using a picture of?
That and like a hidden sanity score probably cause dying over and over will fuck your shit up.

>>50044707

I suppose there's only so much you can do with groups of Guardians who didn't ask for this but it would be interesting if their nihilism could be leveraged by the Darkness.

Some entity corrupts and kills your ghost but in the process you have to do some kind of favor for the entity for the chance to permenatly die or something like that.

File: 2spooky.gif (314KB, 215x194px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 215x194px

>>50042900
I've wanted to do a one on one game using Runequest for some time now but no one I know is up for a post-when-you-can online side game.

>Runequest characters have passions which determine what's important to them
>dying would decrease passions and having a passion reduced to zero
>your character hollows out when all of their passions hit zero
>defeating bosses, finding items relevant to you, or achieving certain milestones would add to passions
>utilizes Runequest's more tactical combat for more in-depth duels and fights along with a slightly higher lethality
>various magics so replicating Souls magic would be somewhat easy mechanically
>world similar to Demon's Souls or Dark Souls 1 but mostly original, borrowing elements from all Souls games

Oh well. Have a spooky gif

>>50044783
There are amour sets that make the player look like a Taken Guardian, but nothing in game.

I suppose coding an enemy that believably acts like a player is really difficult, so no enemy guardians.

Though there are Guardians who operate outside the City's and by extension the Traveller's jurisdiction in Osiris and his followers.

Our characters can't be kept dead or even dismembered in the usual ways, but it's suspected that if we lost our heads or our bodies were completely destroyed, we'd be done. So a TPK can be a TPK if our enemies know they have to burn our bodies. Our non-individually-bound loot is also up for grabs.

But, most importantly, because we aren't still immortal, we need greater offensive strength to challenge the real enemies in the world. So we need allies, allies we often have to work with to satisfy them and gain their trust, so we can't squander their lives. There is no resurrection magic for them. Even a single lost alliance might make our coalition too weak to oppose the Empire that will be invading soon.

But, now we went into a battle where the enemy, a sort of famine god's herald, can rather rapidly devour a victim whole, and there is no coming back. Furthermore, death near it means a demon might burst it of you. So we have to be even more careful than adventurers in a typical game.

>>50043054
Asura's Wrath is a lovely example of this.

>>50042900
If you the world of your campaign is engrossing enough to get the players invested in it emotionally, losing it should be big enough threat.

>>50044919

Yeah, even though the Warlord era was over I wouldn't be surprised if there are more then a few rogue guardians in desperate parts of Earth and the rest of the Solar system.

The gun Bloody Murder (I think that's what it's called) details a nameless guardian who went around murdering guardians and the gun became infamous to the point that it was declared to be destroyed on sight.

>>50042900

That's pretty much the point of Eclipse Phase.

>>50042900
Even if for some reason the players are never in personal danger (which as other people pointed out, is far from inherently included with "immortality"), that doesn't mean nothing is on the line.

Just because superman might not be in danger doesn't mean innocent people might get hurt if doesn't stop the bad guys quickly enough. Not that I'm a fan of the superman franchise.

>>50045111
That was the original flavor text for Red Death.

Man, why wasn't the game set during the warlord era?

>>50045196

That would be something I'd like to see, especially after seeing shit about the Iron Lords getting into personal duels to the death with various warlords.

That would be something worth making a TT game of. Being a guardian post Collapse and deciding to either become a warlord or striking it up with the fledgling city/Iron Lords

>>50045111
There were also likley Guardians involved in the uprising at Bannerfall where one of tthe factions tried to ovethrow the government.

The political system of the City is another thing that should be expanded on more.

>>50045264

Yeah, we have the 5 major groups (Vanguard, Crucible, FWC,NM,DO) but surely there has to be more then that and the only group to get any real story time is Future War Cult because they have a machine that drives you insane showing you visions of the future.

What's New Monarcy's deal? Why the hell have Dead Orbit stuck around as long as they have?

>>50042900
You don't die...but you don't exactly come back, either.

When you die, your soul is sent to a massive, incredibly strong fortress in the middle of an inhospitable (though still accessible, to those who really want to travel there) wasteland full of dangerous beasts.

In a crystal coffin, your whole being is trapped and confined for all eternity. You can move - slightly - and you can see out of the coffin, but it is completely unbreakable to any known form of might or magic. The keeper of this fortress - some claim he is the god of Death, others a powerful lich, while some even claim he's simply a businessman who stumbled onto some powerful medicine - is willing to release your soul - for a price. More often than not, the price is something dear and permanent to your being - the ability to laugh, your right toe, memories of a specific person - but still more it is a price that you cannot pay. Instead, someone else must come and pay your bail, through an action, deed, or sacrifice of their own. Until that day comes, however, all you can do is watch as other dead are bartered and freed by their loved ones, all the while hoping that somebody will come to pay the price needed to free you.

>>50045297
New Monarchy preach a message of hope, unity and a return to the Golden Age. However they think the city needs decisive and quick government for this, but the current system is going to end badly in a mire of indecision. So they want to put a king of 'impecable character' in place, the current pick is Zavala of the Vanguard, but he isnt interested.

As for DO, I can only imagine its because they're actively improving the Citys space capability and are easily ignored.

>>50045390
this is pretty much the death mechanic in Dungeon World

>>50045423

That could be something to work off of. New Monarcy kicks off the second faction war loudly proclaiming "Fuck the Speaker, Long live the King!"

>MakeTheLastCityGreatAgain

File: havens and hells.pdf (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>50042900
there's a GURPS splatbook for that

the answer is that death still has consequences - they're just different from being unable to affect the world anymore.
you might lose power or resources, your enemies might gain power or resources

also look up eclipse phase, where death costs you memories because ressurection involves backing up your mind every x amount of time, and then the backed up mind being put into a new body if you aren't heard of for a while or are confirmed dead.

>>50044576
I doubt it. But, even if you did, congrats: the "you" have now stopped existing and the shell of what you once was is trapped forever.

Never die permanently is different from never dying. They could come back years after they remember dying, or every time they resurrect it could take memories or even the lives of others

>>50042900

Fates worse than death are a real danger.

The worse bad ends are the ones where you can't ever die.

Death doesn't matter if the fight you died in had different stakes than "I survive or not".
It can be simple stuff as getting to your transportation to your next destination. If you die here, it's gone and you have to finde another way to continue. Then you escalate upwards, always with the imminent danger that the players will face more difficulties or might even fail their quest, lose important NPCs and generally have more problems.
Of course, this doesn't work when you're simply going dungeon crawling. You'd need to have quite a few important social encounters and you have to build up stuff the players can actually lose.
So to answer OP: Yes, it can be done. What's at stake is the success of the campaign and what the players care for.

>>50042900
Remove death, add a Sanity (Or in case of OP image, Hollow) stat.

Given certain intervals, roll checks against said stat. If the check is failed, GM determines your next action.
At a certain threshold, failure means GM takes permanent control over your PC.

I mean it's basically death but I've considered it.
Plus the rest of the world is a shithole due to lack of death.

>>50042900
If you want dark souls specifically, they can still go hollow after dying enough times.

>>50042900
>What's at stakes, if player characters are never in real danger?
Create characters and places that the players care about, and put them in danger.

>>50042900
Things can happen to other characters or things, you know.

>>50042900
It's not like resurrection isn't a mechanic in a lot of games.

>>50042900
You can do it the PS:T way - you come back as a clean slate, but your deaths leave traces, both literally (haunting shades of your former lives) and in the sense of repercussions for your previous actions. Imagine finding yourself having to deal with the consequences of a crime you don't remember committing.

>>50042900
While ressurective immortality removes some danger, it doesn't free the characters from consequences. Even if you will come back, NPCs might not. That dungeon you died in the middle of clearing might be long looted by rival parties, or entirely replenished and reinforced by the forces of darkness. If you die in the climactic battle against the Dark Lord, you come back later - but you failed to stop the Dark Lord, and the land has suffered the consequences of your actions. If you die while storming the megacorp, they might take revenge on your clients - not to mention taking your blinged-out gun from your corpse. If you die while containing the infection on Space Station 14, well, I guess there's one less space station.

Being unable to die doesn't remove the consequences of your actions - rather, it reinforces them by denying you freedom in death.

Only the dead can know peace from this evil, and you will never be at peace.

>>50045601
Well fuck, I thought I was being original.

It's just like the time I wrote half a book in high school, completely unaware it was basically Lord of the Flies 2.0

File: last breath.png (16KB, 1185x142px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 1185x142px

>>50049063
You were, in part. In DW it's just "if you die and roll averageish, Death will offer a deal to live again, and you can take it." He'll want stuff like what you said, probably. Or maybe he'll be a dick about it and say "since you were so sneaky during life, you can live again but you must literally always stay in the shadows or you're comin back here"

But he offers it to you directly, right away, and you can accept it (or not, and actually stay dead), so that is different.

>>50042900

Stats degrade until they literally can't accomplish anything.

File: 46e17578b71adeebe327e516d65c1f9e.png (309KB, 895x1000px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 895x1000px

>>50042900
If the characters are well written in any way, then there's far more they fear about losing than just their lives. There's ways to make it work
.
Even gods can lose. Pic related.

File: wew.png (76KB, 304x646px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 304x646px

>>50042900
I played a character with Unkillable 2 in GURPS. I was playing a paladin and I feared being incapacitated because it meant that my companions would die. There was also the real risk of being permanently disabled, which DID happen when I was stabbed with a magic spear that suppressed my regeneration. I was still playing a character with motivations, morals and desires, so the fact that I couldn't die didn't detract from the overall campaign.

>>50042900
>What's at stakes, if player characters are never in real danger?
I can already tell that you are a bad gm.

>>50042900
If your PCs arent shallow murderhobos, death quickly becomes one of the LEAST troubling outcome.

>>50042900
I've been toying with the idea of doing it kinda, Bioshock infinite style. You die, but you wake up in an alternate time stream earlier than when you left, long enough you could correct it in your next attempt.

I'm thinking to make it more punitive than time and distance, and being separated from the party - possibly knocked out of the campaign depending on how far back they get set.

That the alternate timelines they wake up in, and the way people's memories are overwritten as the time streams meet up (to cover the meta angle), are different than the one they died in, where events in their past (They got the cool shiny guns and bullets) didn't happen, so they'd be down some gear.

Not exactly sure how to best implement that though.

>>50045045
What's the idea behind that?

>>50042900
death is the goal of pcs

>>50042900
>Can you still make an interesting campaign out of this?

I'd kill to play a Souls campaign.

File: Ashisha.jpg (115KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 540x720px

>>50042900
I've been running a campaign with that as half the premise, actually (though it's currently on hiatus) - the PCs are the Dark Lords who've just been unsealed a thousand years after almost conquering the world, and so now they're trying again. They're impossible to kill, in that they can be cut into itty bitty pieces, but continue to be conscious (and still talk even when decapitated), with a limited healing factor.

It's worked pretty darn well, all things considered. Combat is still a threat, since they can still be incapacitated by dismemberement and captured, and none of them are looking forward to the idea of being sealed away again. And their allies are still very much mortal, which means failure still has very permanent consequences (since ressurection magic is so-far impossible in the setting). As a bonus, it also prevents the usual issue with evil player characters in that betraying each other is mostly pointless.

It does mean I've had to keep in mind the change in stakes when designing encounters - as a general rule, if a combat has absolutely no stake in it, then I won't bother putting it in. Most their fights so far have been under the threat of early discovering getting them re-sealed, or vital allies being killed, and as the hiatus started just as they were getting into the world-conquest part of the campaign, failures will result in significant setbacks for their empire.

>>50042900
making them regret their worst decisions forever

>>50051152
Well, in Asura's Wrath, you're betrayed by your allies, who kill your wife, frame you for killing the Emperor, and steal your daughter to use as a power source. Then they kill you.

The few levels are you climbing out of Hell to find several thousand years have passed, and they've become worshipped as gods by the populace.

>>50051585
Er, next few levels.

Also, a little while later, they do it again. And you have to climb out of hell all over again, to find out another 500 years have passed.

The values/goals of the characters would be adjusted. Ex: if they are lawful good, they'd be pushed to enforce total justice on the entire world (whatever they consider that to be). Anything less would be failure. Alternately, increase the scope so their agency is reduced and they have less control.

>>50042900

Every death causes a loss of self. Treat this as a loss of stats that can only be offset by humanity/embers and they are exceedingly rare.

That means you can basically wither your character into a nobody. Make the stat loss permanent and random as well.

Seconding points about the other people and places of the world that aren't immortal providing motivation, but there's another big one- accomplishment. In most videogames, non-permanent or reloadable character death represents a setback. Even when canonically you rise again, having fallen takes you from what you were doing and impedes your progress. So even someone only concerned with adventure would want to not see their efforts coming up short at the expense of a stupid, albeit temporary death. The dead don't have to dwell on what is most likely their ultimate fuck-up.

>>50042900
I don't follow the question. Death usually isn't a big deal in any campaign unless you prevent people from making a new character. Not being able to make progress or losing their stuff is probably punishment enough--your image related.

>>50051651
This is especially true in higher-level games that have stuff like Raise Dead.

In D&D, death eventually stops being the unstoppable force and become merely another setback. That doesn't mean that you can't still fail, of course, but it does mean that death matters less.

>>50042900
Just make death lose XP as your memory gets scrambled a bit. You will get back up from being dead but you lose more and more of yourself until you go under "0" XP and then you Hollow as a mindless undead.

>>50045045
The greentext was actually paraphrased from Soul Reaver, which uses a similar plot device. Raziel spends a long, long time before he reawakens by which point the vampires have regressed to barbarism.

File: 1475163032133.jpg (87KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1280x720px

>>50042900
Sanity loss

File: The Freeman.jpg (50KB, 640x478px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 640x478px

>>50052334

>>50052334
>it's number which can take damage due to things which happen to the character and when it reaches zero your character gets taken out of the game
>but it's totally different to HP guys

>>50042900
Time. Sure they'll live forever, but they can be too late to stop the BBEG

>>50042970
>You're technically immortal, but the world is not.
i recently read a story about an immortal living through the constant death and rebirth of the universe.

>>50042900
The bad guy is gonna win in 3 months.
Yeah, you reform the day after you die, but that's a day you've lost.

>>50052358
>Taken out of the game

I feel like you don't understand how sanity should work.

>>50052393
actually I prefer when sanity works as an alteration to the way the character interacts with the world instead of an alternate death mechanic, I just see it used as one too often

File: a2c26fb5c19f2a85596e83e66124eeea.jpg (2MB, 1920x1296px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1296px

>>50052471
You'd think the picture would've tipped you off

>>50052489
>some anime I've never heard of
does it handle sanity in a particularly interesting way then?

>>50042900
RuneScape style
If you die, you drop everything you were holding and respawn in a predetermined place, naked.

>>50052505
Yes it does

>>50052507
>respawn in a predetermined place, naked
It better be the town/city square or a church. Bonus points if it's the latter and PC gets mistaken for some deity

File: SR2-Texture-Stronghold-GuardianBalance.png (536KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 512x512px

>>50042900
give them a permanent stat-reduction every time they die. explain in-universe that every time they die, they move closer to being a fully, "true" dead one - which makes the character into a mindless Ghoul once their "main" stat or one that can relate to this (intelligence, perhaps?) reaches 0.

The players can find rare magical artifacts that will allow a stat-reduced player to fully regain One stat, which will still decrease at the next death per usual. Once a Character becomes a "Ghoul", the player can either quit or roll up a new character. Add the fallen character into a "chance to meet" table - set for random encounters - and the longer it takes for them to meet said Character/ghoul, the more monstrously feral it will have become, perhaps even gaining some stats so it can be an interesting fight.

that's how I would do it, anyhow.

>>50052471
Trail of cthulhu has the best sanity mechanic in an RPG. If you fail, GM and party get to fuck with you (ex. change details of the backstory or the world behind your back).

>>50052619
It depends, if they respawn naked with a flash of holy light it could happen

Or they wake up naked and unconscious on the side of a muddy street with a passerby throwing a torn burlap sack on top of you and calling you a lewd drunk

ITT: you can play "Spot the threaboo".

Srioulsy, "stat reduction" is a stupid answer.

>>50052659
>threaboo
what kind of word is that?

>Srioulsy
go get your meds, then re-type that sentence.

>>50052659
Yeah, everyone who comes up with mechanical penalties on death is doing it wrong.

File: Darkest Large.jpg (48KB, 630x215px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 630x215px

Death is but a door.

You can go through that door, and come back out of it. But the living were never meant to see the land of the dead and come back. There are hungry things there, that eat soulstuff, and latch on to sentience like parasites.

Every time a PC dies, they come back. But a little pieces of their soul is lost every time, and a little bit of the darkness from the land of the dead comes back with them. This first takes the form of mild insanity, then it begins to manifest as bodily corruption. If it happens enough times, and the PC is unlucky, they come back wrong. Bad wrong. They have been subsumed by the things from the land of the dead. And those things are very jealous of the living.

>>50042900

Death is overused as a dramatic device anyway. Think about the typical timescale of a campaign and then compare that with a typical lifespan, it quickly becomes clear that death usually gets far more screentime than is reasonable. Granted in combat-focused stories (which is admittedly the vast majority in the given genre you're talking about) the skewing of the numbers makes a lot more sense but that isn't the only way to run an RPG. Political intrigue, the pursuit of a dream career, exploring and mapping a new region, even mundane relationship management between family members, friends or significant others. It's not difficult to frame a campaign in such a way that the focus isn't on rampant bloodshed.

>>50052676
>what kind of word is that?
Hello, newfriend.

Anyone remember Bagworld?

You couldn't die there. Shit was horrific.

File: 1465026273058.jpg (129KB, 831x768px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 831x768px

>>50052769
I've been here since 2009, but I am sorry that I don't know every word ever written on 4chan. I'll be sure to improve

>>50052804
Neither have I, but it's pretty clear from the context that it refers to people who like D&D3.5 a lot.

>>50052676
Oh wow, I made a typo. Seriously, you sound assblasted.

>>50052680
More or less, yeah. You'll also notice that "stat reduction" is an answer that basically applies only to one edition of D&D, AND it's also something that does not impact the game in an interesting way. It's like saying, "every time you die, I'll rip off a bit of the character sheet". It eventually results in the inability to play, but it's not something that makes for interesting develompment in the game.

My idea for my players was to have them roll characters who have just ascended into an adventurers Valhalla essentially. They would have two levels that went up simultaneously a normal character level (which would be like your normal CL) and a hero level.

Hero xp would be gained from doing valorous and heroic acts. Barbarian dives from a balcony, swings off a chandelier and wins a combat against 3 orcs? Have some hero xp. It would primarily be used to dissuade "safe" play and meta gaming, but in fluff it's because all the new immortal heroes want to be known as the most incredible hero in their afterlife.

Increase to hero lvl would grant spell like abilities or feats to reflect their legend, so maybe a rogue gets the ability to backstab from the front as he has a reputation for being so sneaky he always gets his enemies in the back even when he's not behind them. "Dying" and getting reborn the next day would lose hero xp, as their name is sullied by the shame of loss. Lose too much and you are essentially an undying mortal. The regular character level would be maintained, so if you are a lvl6 warrior who dies all the time you would be lvl6 warrior and lvl0 hero.

Never really thought much on the balance though or abilities to give... I liked the idea of developing heroic abilities around whatever exploits or deeds each character did. So if a wizard managed to save his ally with a last ditch lightning bolt, then stories would spread of the "stormlord" who reigned lightning from the skies and saved the day, before rewarding him with some lightning based spelllike ability.

The thought of everyone trying to outdo each other and using loads of bullshit overpowered abilities against stupid odds seems like fun.

>>50042900
>PCs can never die permamently
>Can you still make an interesting campaign out of this? What's at stakes, if player characters are never in real danger?

see
>>50033677

>>50042900
Depends on what you mean by "Never"

Eclipse Phase kinda does that, where it's the far future and you can have LITERAL life insurance by way of your brain being on a harddrive and having a memory stick at the base of your skull that can be taken out and slotted into a cloned body whenever the one you're in dies.

Trouble: SAN damage by way of either
>A: You die and when your stick get's put into a new body, you remember the moment you got decapitated/dissolved/sucked into the vacuum of space.
>B: Your stick is destroyed and they have to restore you from a back-up several days/weeks/months later, and the trauma of how much time you 'missed'
>C: Your stick disappeared, and when you reawaken in a new body, you end up discovering the 'Old you' is still alive, and the whole experience of finding another you is jarring to say the least.

San damage collects overtime, naturally. So while 'death' isn't permanent (unless someone deletes your back-ups too) madness is a game over.

>>50042900
Yes, this is actually very easy to do

It doesn't matter if YOU don't die, if you're dead while the local lich is killing everybody in the kingdom they're not going to get any less dead. Replace "lich" with any imminent threat, and "kingdom" to any entity

It doesn't matter if the campaign isn't focused on combat on the first place and you're most likely not going to see the benefits of your immortality very often

It doesn't matter if you're pitted against other immortal beings, or if you fight someone with enough political pull that while you could theoretically kill him he's so heavily guarded that it would be very impractical and pointless to do so, and it wouldn't be over once he died, like a noble

It doesn't matter if the world/universe itself is what is at danger

I could go on, just use your imagination

I'm running a campaign where the players fight their way out of hell, every death I've had them be revived with some demonic mutation. Acquire to many and you become one of the demons

File: PPF.pdf (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

We've had this thread before.

>Death isn't a threat to those blessed as a champion of Eredan, the god of Death and Birth
>However, there are limitations to even a gods influence
>Gods will never exist in the mortal realm. Only by being channeled by their devout priests, may they eke influence on the world
>Eredan's priests take a fraction of his consciousness, allowing them to bless items with His powers
>Like with all enchantments, the power is limited. If one blessed relic touches a person carrying His brand, they will be restored to life
>Each relic can only be used a few times. The summoning rite is incredibly taxing, meaning these relics are incredibly rare

Tldr
Party has a pool of 1up mushrooms. It's up to them to decide to reroll or pay to bring their guy back

>>50053195
>You'll also notice that "stat reduction" is an answer that basically applies only to one edition of D&D
Constitution loss was actually standard in D&D UNTIL 3rd Edition, when they added True Resurrection without a penalty.

*the more you know*

>>50052507
This, but in a sci-fi campaign with clones and body-mods.
If you want to have your upgrades copied after death, you need to take several days to travel back to HQ in the flesh and pay for the service.

>>50042900
This thread gave me insight on why America doesn't spend money on mental health, "muh sanity loss" lol.

Look at stories with "immortal" protagonists like vampires and shit. Dying doesn't hurt or scare them half as much as sleeping too long and losing everything they care about because the world doesn't stand still when you "die".

>>50044901
I'd be down to play such a game, always wanted to play Runequest.

The players ARE dead... ish. This is Death's game with them. Collect enough soul coins or whatever, and you can be brought back to real life. You die in this purgatory, you have some choices. You can spend a solid amount of coins to respawn from your corpse. Great way to surprise an enemy. Alternately, you can spend less coins to respawn at your start point with your gear. Or, you can be cheap about it, keep hold of all your coins, and leave your gear behind. Better go running back to get it before whoever ganked you swipes it. This means that death presents you with loss of progress or loss of gear. To really make this fun, Death might offer you a discounted resurrect at start with gear if you allow yourself to take some mutation or curse. Perhaps he'll give you a nifty item in exchange for you taking on a mini-quest. Death acts not only as jailer and game master, but as sole shopkeeper and guild master.

>>50052561
Not really, his abusing the mechanics of the time loop was a lot more interesting.

>>50061246
Do not interrupt the meming.

People need to believe that the answer they hate the most isn't really an answer, and only applies to the game they hate the most.

>>50064299
Look, you can be a smartass all you want. The other guy picked a nit that was not really my point, but I let it go.
Yes, AD&D had you lose 1 Con on resurrection. It also had you make a con-based roll to resist resurrection. That's not the point. Widespread ability damage is something endemic of 3e, and honestly, the point was that, when asking what could be interesting consequences for death, "just reduce the stats" is the most boring and soulless direction you could take.

File: Japanese bird cooking spaghetti.jpg (34KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x375px

>>50042900
How about a plot where you constantly keep track of what the antagonist is doing. The longer the player takes, the further along the evil gets. This means that if you "die" too much, you lose out on shortcuts and people important towards your goal. If the player cannot die, another concept is the act of losing power through the loss of limbs, waiting for them to regrow if they ever do, it will force the player to play more cautiously than ever before as they won't have a simple game over if they lose an arm, but will have to continue on without it. Only after a good night's rest will it return, but that's a night the villain has spent plotting.

Oh and the concept of losing all your memories when you die. This was a concept in planescape torment I believe, or something similar. It's interesting that a simple premise can change, if you're about to save somebody but you die, you'll be forced to watch as the players can do nothing but wait for the inevitable news of your friend's death. The character will find nothing of note off it, but the players will be forced into a grueling campaign as the back of the protagonist's mind, trying eagerly to find ways to remind him of events in hopes that they can still stop the enemy if they die.

File: Consider the following.gif (168KB, 290x200px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 290x200px

Roll 1d6.

Players respawn in 1d6 days.

The world keeps on moving. Their plans might be completely ruined. Maybe they're trying to keep the immortality a secret, and now it's impossible.

The BBEG is still on the move, and nothing's stopping him. People needed saving, nobody was there for them. PCs are lost, trying to piece together news on what happened.

Maybe they don't all spawn at the same time or place, need to find each other.