If there are "manlands" does that mean there are "manscaping"

Yes but no. To mansplain quickly, all manland decks are super janky.

>>48811706
Relative, there is always humility combo fuckery or winning with manlands it's very common in HYPER grindy decks.

I built a deck based around various "if you control exactly one creature" effects, it uses manrocks along with manlands, but is apparently just what OP is asking about.

>>48811367
I mean, there's ensoul artifact darksteel citadel if that counts

>>48811367
Any deck with Sylvan Advocate in it

Embodiment of Fury, Embodiment of Insight, Halimar Tidecaller, Sylvan Advocate and Terra Eternal all help.

File: wombo combo.jpg (840KB, 1490x1040px) Image search: [Google]

840KB, 1490x1040px

>>48811706
>all manland decks are super janky
43 Lands is a super solid control deck.

>>48813094
It also doesn't really do the manland thing anymore. Lands has a Depths combo finish and a Punishing Fire control finish.

File: Rude-Awakening.jpg (16KB, 200x285px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 200x285px

this maybe but not with manlands

>>48813700
loam pox is probably the closest, and it usually just plays factories

>>48820763

What I want is a "burger" mechanic where I drop some huge things on the field to feed and buff smaller things, manlands offer something roughly equivalent to what I have in mind for my R/W/U deck

>>48817568
Dear god. I remember losing to this card entwined in EDH. Shits scary, especially with coat of arms in play.

>>48824921
Coat of Arms does nothing as the lands don't have creature types.

>>48811367
The real power of manlands is that they don't need support to be insane. The sheer fact that your lands can win you the game is why decks always run them when they're legal. RTR-THS UWx control used Mutavault as it's only win condition for example.

File: faerie conclave.jpg (29KB, 223x310px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 223x310px

>>48824966

Manlands do have creature types when in man-mode though

>>48825033
Coat of Arms still does jack shit in the combo under discussion.

>>48825061
Isn't "land" the creature type?

>>48825093
No you idiot.

See >>48825033

>>48825093

No more than Instant is a creature type.

Lands only gain creature types of they are explicitly mentioned on their card or on whatever made them a manland.

>>48825061
>>48825093

To be fair this is EDH we're talking about, which is casual - sounds like both players thought the lands have "land" as their creature type and let them get the resultant MASSIVE buff from that when used on 43 rudely awakened lands.

File: 1457636726613.gif (70KB, 296x335px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 296x335px

what

>>48824921
there is a land creatures get +2/+2 green enchantment