>Drafting >10th pick, nothing good on colour >Take Harness

>>48719384
Might be fun in flashback.dec
>from your hand
Fuck it.

File: Dredge.jpg (30KB, 223x310px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 223x310px

>>48719384
Drag Under 2U Return target creature to it's owner's hand. Draw a card - thought it was an Instant cuz what the fuck!?
Spreading Flames 6R Deals 6 damage divided as you choose among any number of target creatures. Not players, just creatures. Fucking garbage.

Also when I first started playing mtg when I just turned 11, I had this happen to me a lot. I mean I didn't have any cards that made me sacrifice something, I don't remember the rules booklet mentioning that mechanic too. So I ended up trading Counterspell for Dredge thinking it destroys a creature or land and you get a card.
Also I traded a Blurred Mongoose for Keldon Berserker and other crap. I though the Berserker got bigger if you controlled a tapped land, but it turned out it got bigger only when you control NO UNTAPPED lands so that sucked. Fucking people, I swear , those were adults who made those trades fully aware that I knew not what cards were worth something. Don't trust people since.

>>48719384
Looks like a niche build-around cantrip-storm card. Kinda want to build something fucking stupid out of it, if I hadn't already made a R/U Prowess deck n times.

>>48720155
Spreading flames is so expensive because WoTC thinks the game will implode if red gets any form of card advantage.

>>48721174
Red can only get "lol so randum" effects nowadays.

>>48719384
>costs 3 mana to play it
>it has to be instant or sorcery
>it has to be cast from hand
>it has to be in your graveyard
>you still have to pay the costs

Can you put any more restrictions on this fucking card?

>>48721299
It could exile the spell after you cast it

>>48721174
Spreading Flames is expensive because it is already a plague wind in most limited games.

>>48719495
That would be great in an un-set

>>48721544
Not in a set full of 2/3s with occasional 2/4s. The times I played it I always had leftover damage

File: image.jpg (86KB, 312x445px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 312x445px

>>48721596
Fair. I do feel it is appropriately costed for an uncommon though.

Anyway, here is mine. I thought it said Exchange. I was so excited.

>>48719384
4 Harness the Storm
4 Cantrip
4 Cantrip
4 Cantrip
4 Cantrip
4 Ritual
4 Ritual
4 Ritual
4 Prowess

???

>>48721804
It's costed fine, I wish it could target players like other Pyrotechnics-style cards

>>48721926
For a 3 mana enchantment you're better off with Pyromancer's Swath and storming out

>>48721299
B-But we were afraid that someone would find an use for it!

File: image.png (135KB, 223x311px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 223x311px

I didn't see "combat" on my first read.

>>48721174
Bedlam Reveler and Tormenting Voice + Madness are probably better than everything white have ever had.

>>48722633
And I thought it was an Ooze when I first read it.

Why isn't it an Ooze?

>>48721299
They could also force you to discard your hand when you cast it.
Although it could be maybe better that way.

File: AND-OR.jpg (23KB, 265x370px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 265x370px

I thought that she exiled herself AND another creature. So she could be unkillable, but costing 2 life every turn.
But no, it's not that way.

>>48721299
Cumulative Upkeep {R}

>>48721804
Tree of Perdition

>>48725330
literally what?

Never have I ever saw a MTG thread on 4chan before. This is to be cherished.

>>48725677
Have you ever been to /tg/ before?

>>48722235
In standard?

>>48723643
I thought the same thing.

>>48723024
I know right?, Its ability is so ooze-like too.

>tfw when you find out lord of atlantis isnt actually a 3/3

>>48723643
>Up to one
Why would you ever do this? Activating her 0 and not exiling her is literally worthless

>>48728243
The concept there is that the actively hostile towards Emrakul Geists are rising up the forests, so when they attack things they spread the geists. It's not a bad card, especially with all the pumping green can do.

>>48721299

>a red instant or sorcerery

File: 71.jpg (58KB, 312x445px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 312x445px

>>48719384
Plus the flavor text references Rooftop Storm, so that's a bit of a punch in the nads too seeing as that's all about casting stuff without paying costs

>>48728924
trigger etb effects

>>48721299
>you have to control a wizard to activate this effect
>this effect can only be activated once per turn

>>48728924
Things don't come back until your next upkeep. That can be used to get rid of a blocker or stall a threat.

>>48734235
He's commenting on the up to one clause, not the target creature clause.
He's wondering why the hell anybody would activate her +0 to exile nothing, and why they'd even include the option.

>>48734321
not having it might force you to have an available target to activate the ability.

>>48722633
Oh. Whoops. I definitely cheated at some limited events.

>>48734235
could this mean brago is coming back at the beginning of the next set?

>>48734359
but she can exile herself if there aren't any creature targets

>>48720155

Drag Under and that 1U - Draw a card plus an additional card for each card name X in your graveyard are both reprints of old, good Instants at Sorcery speed. Repulse and Accumulated Knowledge.

>>48728552
I was so mad when I found out it had been oracled.

>>48728924

I would suppose if you were mindslaving your opponent and wanted to use it, but not reset the walker and they have no creatures to exile, but it's about the only corner case I can see.

>>48739457
>>48739457
It never was a 3/3. It used to not be a Merfolk.

>>48719495
>UR
>Not Black
Unplayable
seriously, why do monoblack edgelords pull this shit every time?