Why people blame Twilight for ruining vampires when it's

>>48167083
I must disagree with you anon, Dracula is an enjoyable novel and helped spawn the idea of vampires being able to infiltrate and act as a parasite upon society. Which works quite nicely from a horror perspective.

Twilight was poorly written and made them sparkle.

>>48167083
I blame Twilight for making young adult novels popular.
Twilight is like a Japanese LN, but Western.
Literally cancer.
It spawned a bunch of shitty uninspired franchises like 50 Shades of Gray that enjoyed a wild success among people too illiterate to enjoy proper literature. And, no, I'm not talking about B-tier paperback fantasy/sci-fi/whatever novels when I'm talking about "proper literature".

File: 1466349526555.jpg (18KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x360px

If anything Anne Rice ruined them first, and harder. A lot of what she did to them stuck meanwhile nobody really thinks of Twilight vampires as real vampires.

>>48167083
Dracula's a terrible novel, but it did inspire Nosferatu. Ruthven and Carmilla predated Dracula as sexy undead, they ultimately deserve your blame.

>>48167297
You sound like a faggot fedora to be honest. You should propably kill yourself.

>>48167083
My problem with Twilight isn't that they 'ruined' vampires, it's that they were being called vampires when they clearly weren't. Seriously, I'd have given less of a damn if they had just called them Fae.

>>48168136
Totally uncalled for desu

>>48167297
dracula was a good novel until the bullshit about chasing dracula across the fucking coutnry then it was boring

>>48168291
for me it was an excellent thriller until he introduced lucy, who is just a lustful whore who derails a tense novel.

>>48168179
they are more like Blood drinking golems!

come on, they sparkle! clearly they have gem growth on them!

>>48168136
>>48167136
>its an old classic! its enjoyable!

let me guess, you also think HP Lovecraft was a literary genius, AND you think if it wasnt for Starship Troopers that no one would have power armor today.

>>48167083
Dracula is a Mary Sue!

>hurr I turn into anything! even fucking smoke!

>hurr fuck sunlight!

>hurr you need like an entire party to kill me!

yer a faget DM

>>48168333
You sound more retarded with every post.

>>48168136
Just saying there was sexy vamps before Dracula. Also, Varney predates him, and going on synopsis that novel is your basic CWoD game.
>>48168291
>>48168330
Epistolary structure ruins it. William Gibson wrote the basic plot and theme better in the Sprawl trilogy.

>>48167083
>Before Briam Stoker wrote the novel vampires were disgusting, zombie like creatures not handsome aristocrats.
But they weren't. Several examples of aristocratic vampires predate Dracula, such as Carmilla.

>>48167083
>Before Briam Stoker wrote the novel vampires were disgusting, zombie like creatures not handsome aristocrats.
Nigga, John William Polidori wrote "The Vampyre" 80 years before Bram Stoker wrote "Dracula".

>>48168379
Didn't he get completely decapitated in one slash by one guy with a kukri?

I seem to recall that.

>>48167083

Stoker deacribes Dracula as an ugly deranged fuck with scars and a massive mustache. He was a rapist with degenerate slaves.