You find a disk roughly three-inches in diameter that is indestructible.

>>47343975
Jam it into things that need to be gummed up with a Darksteel Artifact
Thats all i can really think of

(Also, compared to the hands? Thats closer to a 5 or 6 inch diameter disk)

>>47343975
I eat it.

>>47343975
throw it at someone

>>47343975
Bludgeoning weapon.

>>47343975
Learn to throw really really good. Like, Captain America levels of good. Having an unbreakable throwing object makes unstop

"Bet you can't break this disk, faggot." $$$

File: technologic.jpg (13KB, 480x360px)

13KB, 480x360px

>>47344015
>>47344030
>>47344046
>>47344050

>jam it
>eat it
>throw it
>beat it

>>47343975
Place a phylactery counter on it.

>>47344090
bop it

>>47343975
>indestructible

How dense does indestructible mean? Virtoptim levels of density?

Enable Metalcraft.

>>47343975
I wear it as a badge over my heart.

I am not a clever man.

File: 19856351232_d2134e991f_c.jpg (159KB, 800x600px)

159KB, 800x600px

>>47343975
>>47343975
Marginally improve the efficiency of a nuclear weapon.

Put it in a vaccuum and heat it to an unreasonable degree (you can use the sun to get it to a fairly reasonable temperature. See: https://what-if.xkcd.com/145/). You might be able to use lasers. Your now quite warm object would start to behave like https://what-if.xkcd.com/35/

Chuck it into the sun to see what happens.

Really, a lot of the applications an indestructible object can be replicated by merely very strong objects (for their application) ranging from iron to depleted uranium.

>>47343975
Throw it into a Sphere of Annihilation and watch reality unmake itself.

>>47344090
mein negroid

Create science out of it.

>>47343975
betting people that they can't destroy my disc. I reckon I could clean out every barbarian in the tavern if I'm careful not to piss them off too much.

>>47344148
>Chuck it into the sun
>to see what happens

fucking scientists I love you

>>47344063
Why not use a merely quite strong object made of iron or steel?

Hockey puck.

>>47344178
Well, I mean, if we could chuck it into a black hole that would be far more interesting, but that's probably quite far away. Even a neutron star would be fun. But since they're all (thankfully!) quite far away, our local star will have to do.

Assuming the object is made of /something/ that has charged particles, it won't pass through the sun or anything like that (unless we /really/ throw it hard), but the colours it glows will be interesting to watch.

>>47344223
Found the Canadian.

>>47343975
Tiny buckler
Doorstop
Spare wheel for wagon

>>47343975
>a disk roughly three-inches in diameter that is indestructible

I look for the three inch diameter indent it's supposed to go into, because that thing is obviously the solution to an inventory puzzle somewhere.

>>47344249
There's literally no point in throwing it into a black hole because any light we would use to observe it's reaction would be sucked into the black hole. Also it might just teleport into another dimension because we know Fuck-All about black holes.

Use it as a drink coaster

I try and break it. Indestructible is just another word for "Never hit hard enough".

>>47344327
only sensible choice

File: catgirlpointandlaugh.gif (347KB, 694x720px)

347KB, 694x720px

>>47344134
>Virtoptim levels of density?

Underappreciated post. I chuckled.

>>47344311
Any light from events beyond the event horizon would be trapped, correct.

But we'd expect the object to spaghettify on the way down, and that we could (in theory) observe. If the object is an indestructible disc, it presumably can't become a long noddle o' atomic fun.

We'd get to see some /very/ strong forces start to tug on whatever's keeping it together.

>>47343975
Put it in the way of an unstoppably powerful weapon.

>>47343975
Jock strap insert.

Gotta have your priorities right

I dunno, charge it with your energy of choice (heat, momentum, static, etc) until reality breaking levels ensue.

Bonus points: kill the bbeg or the any stupid diety in the setting

Launch it from a railgun and put a nice disk-shaped hole through the planet

File: GoodluckI'mbehindthreeinchesofdarksteel.jpg (80KB, 640x468px)

80KB, 640x468px

>>47343975
Use it to Withstand Death

>>47343975
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1599

I wear it under my clothes somewhere random on my body, so if I'm ever shot there's a small chance it will hit this bulletproof disk leaving me unharmed, and making my assailant the laughing stock of me.

File: Phylactery Lich.jpg (75KB, 700x499px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 700x499px

>>47343975

File: Ensoul Artifact.jpg (70KB, 312x445px)

70KB, 312x445px

>>47345284

>>47345284
I gave that lich a phylactery
Liches Love Phylacterys

>>47345302
This card makes me wonder what kind of personalities various Artifacts would have.

Does Lux Cannon have any hopes or dreams? Does Eternity Vessel enjoy its job? What motivates Grindclock?

>>47345302
I really want to make a deck centered around Ensoul Artifact, Ornithopter, and Darksteel Relic, for an army of early game OP toy army

>>47343975
Drink coaster

>Indestructible door stop

>>47343975
I sell that shit to the government for a great deal of money for research and use. I don't have the resources available to seriously use it to it's full potential, so why not profit off of it instead while it goes to somewhere more useful?

>>47347324
If it's indestructable, how much research into the object itself could anyone really do?

File: Image (2).png (121KB, 223x310px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 223x310px

>>47343975
Bring it to life.

>>47347511
>>47345302

>>47344249

Wouldn't it explode in an explosion more than 3 times bigger than the nuclear bomb in Hiroshima due Hawking radiation?

>>47345302
I have a tezzeret UB deck dedicated to doing this.

People wonder why the field has 2 darksteel axes and a load of random artifacts just sat there, then they start getting hit with them.

>>47344446
Why does she have human and cat ears?

Give it to a really pissed off hockey team.

>>47346537
I already have. Mono Blue Aggro is damn good.

File: 473b84_5896765.jpg (83KB, 1200x638px)

83KB, 1200x638px

>>47343975
Throw it in a black hole and watch it shatter the laws of physics since it won't condense.

Railgun it at the speed of light to destroy anything

Find a way to duplicate it with a spell or some shit

Toss it in a Sphere of Annihilation to break the laws of reality some more

Offer it to your local god of destruction to kill said god since if something can not be destroyed he has no reason to exist anymore. If it doesn't do that it will at least keep him occupied trying to find a way to destroy it. Giving it to any god really, but the one who may have the most interesting experience would be the grim reaper. Even mater is eventually claimed by him due to the heat death of the universe, but giving him something he is unable to decay would net you a free pass at least once.

If you can find a rope strong enough and a method to launch it into space, could work as a multi use meteorite

>>47347651
>Offer it to your local god of destruction to kill said god since if something can not be destroyed he has no reason to exist anymore. If it doesn't do that it will at least keep him occupied trying to find a way to destroy it.

That is the dumbest plan I have ever heard for godkilling, and trust me, I have heard a lot of dumb plans.

Also

>Keep him occupied
>Implying he can't just get around to figuring something out after he's destroyed everything else

>>47346233
>What motivates Grindclock?
It just likes to see you squirm as it makes that awful cranking noise at three in the morning from your asshole neighbor's house.

>>47347598
That, my friend, is a discussion for another thread.

Because that discussion could take up a thread.

>>47343975
Duplicate it hundreds of times
Raise undead dragon
Graft indestructible scales to undead dragon
Get fucked by some faggot who calls himself the Lord of Sunlight

>>47343975

Make a quantum computer out of it that will survive the end of the Universe.

>>47343975
Coaster.

File: strange2.jpg (80KB, 1000x800px)

80KB, 1000x800px

One strangelet hits a nucleus of normal matter, catalyzing its immediate conversion to strange matter. This liberates energy, producing a larger, more stable strangelet, which in turn hits another nucleus, catalyzing its conversion to strange matter. In the end, all the nuclei of all the atoms of Earth are converted, and Earth is reduced to a hot, large lump of strange matter.

>>47347901
does this shit actually exist or is it just some physicist's hypothetical?

>>47347929

If it exist, it's probably in the form of neutron/quark stars converted into strangelets due the bizarre characteristics of it. Most of the structure of neutrons stars remain theoretical. I mean, it's a fucking star with a gravity so high, escape velocity is half of the speed of light, that atoms no longer exist, it's just solid degenerate nuclear matter (neutrons and more neutrons) with the nucleus being a superfluid of neutrons or plasma quark-gluon. Only the crust is made of atoms. It's like an atom of the size of a mountain. And yet, they are real.

>>47344095
>place a phylactery counter on it

you madman!

File: GameCubePage01.jpg (101KB, 400x344px)

101KB, 400x344px

>>47343975
Put it into my GameCube.

File: wot.jpg (33KB, 192x192px)

33KB, 192x192px

>>47343975
fuck

I'm the Dragon Reborn aren't I?

File: Image.jpg (33KB, 223x310px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 223x310px

>>47346233
Do ensouled artifacts dream of electrickery?

>>47347929
Strange matter certainly exists; we've observed it in particle colliders for decades. Strangelets would be comprised of a much larger number of strange particles than we've ever made at once. (thousands or more lambda particles, composed of an equal number of up, down, and strange quarks.)

The real question is whether strangelets would have the properties described in >>47347901, and the answer depends on a particular number we've been unable to measure. (the surface tension of a large collection of strange matter) Even attempting to calculate the expected value of that number is very difficult, due to the non-perturbative nature of quantum chromodynamics.

If the surface tension is high enough to cause that behavior, then strangelets would be the second-scariest scenario in particle physics.

Source: I'm a particle physicist.

File: Solar Goddess.jpg (44KB, 410x544px)

44KB, 410x544px

>>47343975
Me personally?
I'll donate it to science otherwise it's just joining my bric-à-brac shelf along side the coral, meteorite fragments, Flying Fox skull and the old Hero Quest Gargoyle.

My current character however, a Paladin of a Sun Goddess.
She has a home-brewed spell to 'temporarily' create a miniature sun (that refuses to follow the laws of physics and kill everyone planet wide) that acts as a combination Holy Symbol and baby Aura of Life and a Protection from Evil spells. As well as providing the light and heat of a hot summer's day.
The sun last as long as the item she uses for it can survive.
And indestructible disc? The DM is either going to introduce an arbitrary time limit or some other form of fiat or simply accept that I'm now carrying summer with me everywhere.

>>47348274
>second-scariest scenario in particle physics.


What's the most scary then?

>>47343975
See what kind of monster I get when I stick it in the disc tray. Hopefully it'll have infinite lifespan and I can make it punch shadows for a year.

>>47347929
If they tended towards such behaviour, then their creation must be near-impossible, or high energy cosmic radiation would have brought about strangelet apocalypse a loooooong time ago.

File: I Understood That Reference.gif (883KB, 500x269px) Image search: [Google]

883KB, 500x269px

>>47347876

>>47344063
no. you still need to apply a level of kinetic energy to the object thats beyond your human capabilities to properly benefit from its ability. for you it would not matter if it was made of steel or iron.

>>47344448
but gravity is a weak force

>>47348779
Wut

Suspend it in a magnetic field in a vacuum, then begin slowly spinning it faster and faster (this can be accomplished either by striking it obliquely with a laser, or using a second oscillating magnetic field).

It is able to store an infinite quantity of angular momentum, since it will never tear apart from the stress. I'm not sure what step 2 is, but a battery that can hold infinite power has got to have a use (beyond the obvious of "really big bomb").

Quick question. How would you guys manage to get it to the sun or a black hole with a poor man's budget?

>>47349019
Think about how immensely huge the earth is, and how much gravity it must emit to keep the moon in orbit. Now stand up. You just overcame all that gravity.

>>47349019
Gravity is so much weaker than the other fundamental forces of the universe that the scale of the difference is difficult to express.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction#Overview_of_the_fundamental_interactions

>>47349284
Gravity is dependent on the mass of both objects you dimbus.

>>47349284
>how much gravity it must emit
No. No. No.

Gravity is indeed weaker than the other fundamental forces, but that way of explaining it is so far from the truth as to be flat-earth levels of stupid.

>>47349284
But human muscles are crazy strong, relatively speaking.

>>47348779
We don't give a rats ass about how many zeroes there are in the gravitational constant here, what we care about is the mechanical stress within the disc.

Though given its size, getting a sufficient gravitational gradient probably means we need a very, very small black hole. Maybe one a centimetre or two across?

>>47344249
>but the colours it glows will be interesting to watch.
And then you just get a black body spectrum.

>>47346537
you want darksteel citadel, not relic

>>47348274

are you more of a sheldon or a leonard?

>>47343975
Probably try to sell it to a university or something. I'm not an engineer but surely there's some kind of scientific application for an object that's literally completely indestructible. They'd be interesting in studying it at least.

Detect Magic on the thing. If it's magically indestructible, then a simple disjunction will fix all of that. If it's not magical, then enchant into an immovable rod and leave it places for maximum hilarity.

>>47348557
I WAS TRANSPORTED

>>47349283
Throw it really hard. Use a really big catapult.

>>47349648
>enchant into
If that is an option I combine it with a skintight bodysuit, or myself if I am willing to risk some lovecraftian shit..

>>47349381
>human muscles are stronger than the moon
HFY

>>47349760
I didn't mean turn it into something that it isn't, if it's indestructible that's probably not an option. I mean cast the spells on it that allow it to function as an immovable rod.

>>47349781
At that point it is probably better to weaponize it.

Just melt some metal onto it let it harden and use it as a mace.

>>47344090

I'm amazed no one has offered to fuck it yet . . .

>>47344134
>indestructible means dense

You have no idea how the world works, do you?

>>47349780
I wonder how I should go about creating some alien race that can't resist gravity.

>>47349811
Just sell it and hire some mercenaries. A mace has little to gain form stronger materials than bronze, iron and steel, the shape here probably won't be ideal, the bond between it and the metal may be non-existent so the whole thing falls apart, but a few good soldiers at your side is pretty much guaranteed to help in a fight.

>>47349811
Are you implying that you can't weaponize an immovable rod?

>>47343975
Enchant it with Ensoul Artifact.

Improvise some kind of scam, promising endless riches to whoever manages to break it, and making everyone who wants to try pay a considerable sum

>>47349285
But gravity is never expended. The gravity created by a single speck of dust reaches every single part of the universe, and will until the universe ends.

>>47344446
Could you explain it, mr. nice quads?

>>47348531
Vacuum destabilization. Strangelets would stop growing when they've converted all nearby matter into strange matter. A lower-energy vacuum state, on the other hand, wouldn't stop growing until it consumed all nearby spacetime. Some theories say that the vacuum could randomly destabilize one day due to a quantum fluctuation, and nothing we could do would stop it or even tell us that it's happening. (or maybe it's already happened somewhere out there and the bubble is rushing toward us at the speed of light...)

>>47349564
That show is a perpetuation of nerd stereotypes and is not representative of the actual community.
I know people who conform to most of those sterotypes, and my own parents have unironically asked me how many of Sheldon's personaltiy traits I intentionally mimic vs. how many I already had. The answer is that I intentionally mimic none of them.

>>47343975
Make a kinetic gravitational engine to use it as an infinite energy source?

>>47347494
You can still bounce stuff off it or through it, even if you can't scrape off a sample.

>>47350033
They're making a joke at the expense of a particularly obnoxious tripfag.

>>47350033
Virtisoptim was an infamous poster on /tg/. He had many dumb opinions he was very vehement about.

>>47350284

My fucking DAD mimics Sheldon for no good reason. "That's my spot." and so on.

I'm like "dad, you realise he's not someone you're supposed to emulate. why do i have to explain role models to a grown-ass man who is also a parent"

>>47350033

Virt is a tumblrite and that about sums him up.

File: 1450392127080.jpg (4KB, 250x237px)

4KB, 250x237px

>>47349860
>A mace has little to gain form stronger materials than bronze
That isn't true.

>>47350355
>who is also a parent"
Turns out the requirements for this are WAY lower than they should be.

>>47350247
If a vacuum destabilization occurs in the woods, and nobody is there to hear it, did they ever really exist at a--

>>47350449

dwarf fortress physics, anon. hooooo people are fucking stupid

>>47350449
If you smash someone in the face with a mace, and he just shrugs it off, odds are it's because your arm was too weak, not because the mace head broke.

>>47349860
Mercenaries can betray you, mace with never betray you.

>>47343975
What is it made of? Is it magnetic?

>>47349825
fuck off faggot

>>47350483
Touché

>>47347979
That's metal as fuck

>>47348274
That's cool as fuck

>>47350247
That's scary as fuck

File: Ricochet_in_The_Amazing_Spider-Man_2.jpg (274KB, 2048x1536px)

274KB, 2048x1536px

>>47343975
Give it to this guy

>>47344887
>Three inches are now buckler level diameter

>>47348114
"indestructible" seals my shiny ta'veren ass

>>47348274
Wouldn't strangelets reduce the entropy of the universe just by existing, thus breaking the second law of thermodynamics?

Doesn't that make them impossible?

>>47351081
Well, as a strangelet converts normal protons, neutrons, and electrons into strange matter, the process would give off radiation in the form of photons and neutrinos. The extra entropy from that radiation is enough to keep the system obeying the second law. (Again, only if the surface tension is high enough)

>>47351353
You appear to either be entirely confused as to what passes for accepted theoretical QFT these days or talking out your ass.

Easy way to check;
1) Describe the vacuum polarisation
2) What is the relevance of the commutation relations of the gamma matricies
3) What is a MERA

Is the entropy of a black hole 0 or infinite?

>>47351552
>>47351552
Neither, it's finite.

There are a few complexities here, but I'm going to wave my hands a bit and state outright that I'm dodging most of the maths and physics to tell a better story.

Entropy is a measure of the number of possible states an object can be in, this is distinct from the number of measurable properties the object can have. In the case of a black hole we can measure the spin, charge and mass of the object; any states based on anything else is not measurable but still exists.

The non-retarded extension of this is the neutron star; the neutron degeneracy pressure results in the entire star acting as if it were a "single atom", however as even neutrons are incredibly variable and versitile combinations of quarks that themselves can exist in different states, the entropy is not bounded by this condition.

>>47351533
I admit I was simplifying it and assuming my audience had no prior knowledge of particle physics. And you're absolutely right that I'm an experimentalist rather than a theorist; I couldn't speak intelligently about multiscale entanglement renormalization. But if people want to ask about nifty physics phenomena, I see nothing wrong with describing it in a simplified manner. (Unless there's someone else around who can answer the question better. Want to take a crack at it so the asker (and probably I) can learn from you?)

A naked singularity appears next to your house.

>>47343975
Coaster
Heartguard
Gun/Cannon Ammo?
>>47344311
Based on my rather limited knowledge of Black Holes, the inside of a BH is at the very end of time either when it has run out if possible, or just so far in the future as to be meaningless. Which would mean if you can escape the inside of a BH you have a very efficient forward time machine

>>47351896
Interesting, I did some work on BELLE a couple of years ago which group are you with?

Anyway, strangelets are still hypothetical with a weak inference of non existence due to having detectors looking for them for 14-16 years and given the high energy events they are supposed to induce this either indicates that if they exist they have both an incredibly low frequency, and an incredibly low coupling strength, combined this disqualifies it as both a dark matter and a dark energy candidate.

That said, the best chance for seeing them is as you head towards the chandrasekhar limit on a neutron star and (possibly very briefly) encounter the quark star.

>>47351081
No, entropy is given as the number of possible states that an object may occupy, just because an object has collapsed to it's quark degeneracy pressure does not indicate that the number of possible states has decreased, though the probability of obtaining them may have.

>>47351081
I kinda hope white holes exist, second law be damned

>>47352022
Not quite;
If you imagine that your path through space time is similar to travelling on a plane where one dimension (y) is time and the other (x) is space, we get black holes of a few different categories.

The first is one with a point singularity, it has no charge and no spin, it's quite dull and you cant do shit with it, your timelike curve (the direction you take relative to the y axis) gets stuck in there

Next we get the black hole spinning, the singularity flattens to a disc (this is well within the event horizon which stays roughly the same) Still with a disc our curve looks pretty boring.

Lastly we add charge to the black hole, and quite a lot of it, we strip a solar mass's worth of electrons and dump them all into this black hole. The disc singularity now forms a ring, and we find there exist stable closed timelike curves by passing through the center of the ring and looping around it, better yet the ring can project outside of the event horizon, so you dont have to worry about the difficulty of getting out.

But here's the catch, there are no black holes near us, there is no current way to amass that amount of charge, or spin the black hole enough, and charging a black hole just attracts particles of the opposite charge which neutralise it again.

>>47343975
Paperweight.

File: image.jpg (77KB, 312x445px)

77KB, 312x445px

I'll tinker with it a bit.

>>47352165
But aren't (in simplistic terms, because I'm not the brightest man) black holes infinitely heavy? They're so heavy they compress themselves and become even heavier? And from what I know of space-time relativity the heavier an object the faster time passes for things near that object (the age difference between someone in orbit on the ISS and a person on Earth). If a BH is infinitely heavy, wouldn't that make time infinitely fast?

>>47352296
No, they have an infinite mass density but a finite mass, if I take the sun and compress it to the size of a tennis ball then it's mass has not increased, but it's mass density has.

>>47352356
But how does infinite mass density not imply infinite mass? There must be some hard cap at how small they can go

Until there's a solution to Relativity and Quantum physics, there won't be a solution to Black Holes. Only hypothesis.

>>47347683
We it depends on the DM's view of gods, are they a super race or personified traits like 40K"s chaos gods

>>47352375
Just because you have trouble understanding some basic concepts of physics like "mass" and "density" doesn't mean black holes work the way you want them to.

>>47352375
Mass density is mass divided by volume.

In this case the volume is zero so mass doesn't matter, the mass density ends up being infinite regardless.

>>47352412
;_;
>>47352424
Wait. So BH's have no spatial existence but have mass?

>>47352375
The only hard cap is the smallest thing we can possibly measure, and that's about 10^-34m, there's nothing saying that something cant be smaller than that, and it's provable that electrons are not only smaller than that, but probably literally zero dimensional points in 4D space.

>>47352447
They have a spatial existence at their singularity, they also have a region over which we cannot observe termed the event horizon where light cant escape (so they look bigger than they are), but their mass is constant.

Electrons are also pointlike and have a constant (albeit much smaller) mass.

>>47352288
>tinker
huehuehuehue
real talk, why is Tinker the most boring vintage wincon?

>>47350018
Wrong. Gravity propogates at c, universe expands faster than c

>>47352644

Isn't that a conjeture? Have we calculated the speed of gravity?

>>47352644

Gravity has infinite range, though.

>>47352671
Pretty sure that was proved with gravity waves

>>47352755
Every fundamental force does, doesnt mean on a finite time scale youre affecting the whole universe.

use it as an knife sharpening stone(depending on grit level)

make youtube videos of trying to break it

weapon

paperwight/coster

>>47352782
>Pretty sure that was proved with gravity waves

Nobody has detected gravity waves yet.

>Every fundamental force does, doesnt mean on a finite time scale youre affecting the whole universe.

Aren't the other forces limited to subatomic ranges? Is it because they have a hard limit, or do they get nullified by counter-forces (singe gravity has none, it is not bound to anything)?

File: Anvil.jpg (31KB, 223x310px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 223x310px

infuse it into the Semblance Anvil and become a Darksteel Blacksmith

>>47352644

If gravity travels at C? How can it escape from a Black Hole?

>>47346537
Buddy of mine did that. Used signal pest and a few affinity artifacts. Consistently very anoying, would recommend

>>47352832
>Nobody has detected gravity waves yet.
We did, in September 2015

>>47352938

Gravity is not a force carried by particles. There's no Graviton. It's the space-time itself.

>>47346537
You mean a standard deck from its time of printing?

>>47352832
Other forces have two terms at different powers. You are incredibly ignorant.

>>47353112
>You are incredibly ignorant.

Nice. I ask a question and I get this. Then again, I'm in 4chan.

>>47353033
>There's no Graviton.
[angry Centurion Devastator noises]

>>47353033
Gravity is actually caused by a particle, just not a matter particle

Quantum vs Relativity. Which one is wrong or more wrong?

>>47353615
Both are correct, but Relativity is more correct.

The theory of relativity is often considered the most impressive scientific theory not only because of how profound it is/was, but also because it makes only two assumptions:
>the universe is real
>we can learn from the universe
Everything else is proven mathematically or from observation.

>>47353765
What are the assumptions the Quantum Theory make?

Assume I'm horrendously ignorant of physics but not a moron.

>>47353818
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/463/what-are-the-most-fundamental-assumptions-of-quantum-mechanics

>>47343975
Ask my kids to deliver it to the smartest person in the country and see if he can figure it out. They aren't going to get any better as adventurers if they just stay in our home town all the time.

Grognak make new club.

>>47356186
Cassius you fuck you can't keep shoving all your responsibilities onto your kids. You're going to make them do all the footwork and show up at the last minute to fight a giant robot again aren't you?

So its indestructible. That isn't important.
Do it have a leeway in bending, or is it inflexible? Because if its inflexible, its one of the most insane weapons you can use as a flail end.

>/tg/ - Come for the games, stay for the physics lessons.

>>47356350
How so?

File: 1460205394520.png (219KB, 354x454px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 354x454px

This is the kind of thread we need more of.
You are all wonderful people.

>>47347888
So after the end of the universe there will be a quantom computer floating around with noone to use it. Brilliant!

>>47343975
Put it between the irresistable force and the immovable object.

>>47360503
[Universe implodes internally]

>>47353155
Not that anon, but when you start talking about "hard caps" in real life, you're a moron. The universe doesn't run on the Unity engine I hope

>>47356350
Wait a minute. If it's completely inflexible, then impacts are going to play out in some very interesting ways. Normally two things come into contact with one another, deform for a fraction of a second while touching, and impart enough force on one another to make them not be in contact any more.

With this disc, only the other object will be deforming. Nothing physics-breaking, but swinging it at shit will certainly make things break in eminently fascinating ways.

Pretty sure my barbarian would just shove it into one of the orifices of his next enemy.

>>47343975
Paperweight.
Curio.
Coaster.

>>47343975
go around betting people they can't break it with a hammer, get rich, marry an elvish bimbo.

File: battle_fairy_by_slipgatecentral.jpg (319KB, 817x1000px)

319KB, 817x1000px

>>47350818

If you're a fairy, sure.

Just imagine. One little chunk of darksteel, useless to humans, that finds its way to the hands of a fairy, who wraps a bit of cloth around it to make a handle, and goes off on an adventure.

For some, its a waste. For others, it kicks off the story of the invincible warrior and his legendary shield, passed down from father to son for generations.

>>47343975
darksteel is also quite heavy, btw

Find myself a privileged position in case someone tries to exile it

>>47343975
I set a carnival game around it.

If you can break the disk, you get 100 Gold.

1 Gold per attempt

>>47362894
>not manifesting your internalized asceticism via a large magical lens to cause a magical opalescence after giving your new disk-friend a soul
It's like I don't even know you

File: ygoGFXz.gif (2MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x500px

>>47347561
Generally, "explode" and "indestructible" are mutually incompatible so... probably not?

File: eYytPm3.gif (3MB, 400x254px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x254px

>>47349384
>black body spectrum

Again, if we get the black body spectrum, we know the object behaves conventional physics. But since it's indestructible, it clearly doesn't (this is assuming we've tried really exotic ways of poking holes in it, like antimatter), so who knows what kind of spectrum will result!

>>47343975

I read that as "dick"

>>47349019
Electromagnetism and the nuclear forces make gravity look like a little bitch

>>47363940

Gravity wins at the end thanks to numerically superiority and no natural enemies.

>>47362437

And that fucking fairy probably can get cover bonuses behind a shield half the size s/he is.

>>47343975

I tie it to a stick and use it as a blunt instrument.

>>47361388
Now, i'm a complete moron, but isn't that just cutting?

>>47365711
No, you don't understand. If you think of the crumple zone on a car - the front is designed to crumple in when you hit something rather than be as hard as possible. The reason is because the crumple takes longer - and therefore though the energy imparted by the end of the collision is the same the deceleration is reduced, so the inhabits of the vehicle are less likely to be injured (as is whatever the car hit). The faster the transfer of energy, the more force/pressure applied, the more damage done.

All real-world objects do this at least a little bit because nothing is perfectly inflexible. If you hit something with a sword, you may not notice the flex, but it is there. With a perfectly inflexible object, the transfer of energy will always be as fast as possible, so you'll fuck up whatever you hit more. I don't know that it would really make a massive difference at the scales we're discussing but hey.

>>47343975
Use it as a coaster. Then it turns into a weapon for a barfight.

>>47365956

It probably wouldn't matter much at this scale, when you punch someone in the face most of the energy is transferred through the compressing air between your fist and his face, air is of course compressible even if the object pushing the air isn't.

>>47366564
>most of the energy is transferred through the compressing air between your fist and his face
Unless you're punching someone at speeds approaching Mach 1, I don't think this can be the case.

Eye patch

>>47343975
Complain to wizards that they are making the game too confusing for my small, casual player brain and that they need to nerf countermagic again and give all of my fav green creatures haste vigilance Tapsformana Hexproof and card advantage.

>>47366608
You're pretty good.

File: Captain_America_Shield.png (4MB, 1832x1832px)

4MB, 1832x1832px

>>47343975
A buckler version

>>47344293
Are you a mouse? Because that's a tiny wagon

>>47351948
I tell it to put some clothes on, and then I either die a quick death or a very quick death.

>>47360463
>So after the end of the universe there will be a quantum computer floating around with no one to use it.
Probably.

>>47367371
for you.

>>47347979
S-second scariest?

>>47370885
See >>47350247

>>47349853
Slimes and oozes

Or a race made of energy, without a physical body so they aren't effected by it, except in large enough amounts to distort space.

>Indestructible disc
Phylactery or use it at the heart of a machine designed to run for heavily extended periods of time without repair.