What do you think about dornian heresy? http://www.bolteran

>>47133946
It's pretty stupid.

>>47134485
Just like Dorn, then.

>>47133946
I disagree.

File: chairman.jpg (109KB, 516x440px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 516x440px

>>47135211
Rogal Dorn, is it really you?

File: no.jpg (81KB, 400x258px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 400x258px

>>47133946
>Sebastian Thor a space marine

>>47137383
That part is just insulting.

It's not the best way it could go. I mean, Blood Angels going Nurgle? It's obvious that they'd go Khorne or Tzeentch, since the latter keeps on messing with them and their successors.

>>47133946
Ranges from interesting to nonsensical.

>>47133946
My biggest problem with this whole deal is that one of Dorn's main character traits is loyalty to a fault so I can't really suspend my disbelief desu

>>47133946
>Dorn has no moustache

It's shit.

>>47133946
i like the idea of swapping the traitors and the loyalist, but when the picked dorn, it fell apart before it began.

if they had picked russ and having him fall do to something to do with magnus, that would make more sense than Dorn

>>47133946
The Ultramarines conceit is a slam dunk. It would be an interesting story by itself. Raven Guard conceit is horrifying as fuck and thus fantastic.

Problems include Dorne as the principle traitor as opposed to Sanguinius or Russ or even Lion.

>>47140627
I actually liked the somewhat less likely picks of which god for the traitors if only for the TWEEST.

My favorite bits are loyalist lorgar and the entire ultramarines separatist thing (which would be really cool if it started to be a thing).