>CL winner >manure @12 >mancity @ 12 >chelsea @17

File: 14188259_10206009593752854_2477337889548973524_o.jpg (121KB, 1520x1520px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1520x1520px

groly groly

I can sort of understand Chelsea/United being above Atlético Madrid, as at least they've shown they can win finals. Atlético are a better team, but they always fall at the last hurdle. If United or Chelsea were to fluke their way to a final, I'd fancy them more than Atlético.

City @12 makes no sense.

File: 1504623830143.png (772KB, 937x602px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 937x602px

>>78172962
>>78173694
Without Real's refball against Bayern Atletico would've won the whole thing

Bookies adjust their lines depending on bets placed. Seeing City odds at 12/1 doesn't mean anyone actually believes that's the likelihood of them winning.

>>78173968

Exactly.

Bookies were offering 7/2 on McGregor winning, because so many bets came in for him. The actual odds should've been 50/1 or something.