Why didn't England just take players from their former colonies

File: George_Washington-AB.jpg (60KB, 334x250px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 334x250px

>>76536819
*blocks their path*

But they do, check their U20

Barely 10% players are from the mainland

>>76536819
>indian players of worth
0
>australian players of worth
Tim Cahil
>Canadian players of worth
Owen Hargreaves

>>76536819
the best africans come from west african which was mainly french

>>76536839
he said former, not current

you take lot of players from the caribbean and african former colonies

>>76536851
sterling

>>76536819
they did, but their blacks are somehow incredibly shit

they colonized the wrong niggaz I guess

>>76536835
Nah they're all born in England to immigrants/to the children of immigrants

France literally just naturalises africans and puts them in their teams

>>76536904
are you implying that pacey negritos are NOT the pinnacle of football?

>>76536819
USA? Canada?

>>76536955
this

>>76536819
because wales and scotland wanted to have their own teams

>>76536955
no they're also born of immigrants who came in France, litterally like yours (except they play football)

>>76536819
They only play cricket.