Its official, WC 2026 will be on USA, Mexico and Canada. ht

>>75176105
Fuck this shit, US and Mexico are enormous nations that have hosted in the past and could easily host again.

Canada is currently 109th and hasn't qualified since the 80's, it's basically Qatar 2.0

I do like the new format though, espeically happy that OFC gets a guaranteed spot. 32-team knockout will be insane.

>>75176105
Not if Colombia wins with their bid.

>>75176105

CONMEBOL can have it.

>Share with the leaves and fucking Mexico, it will be fun

Leaf, USA and Mexico will have free pass to 2016 World Cup?

>>75176578
>2026

Fix'd

File: you have to go back.jpg (150KB, 988x1024px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 988x1024px

>>75176325
>he would rather have Mexico than Canada
Paco. You gotta go back.

File: 8ee.jpg (199KB, 960x919px)

199KB, 960x919px

>>75176624
What I meant to say is that I would rather have one of the three nations host alone, not this joint-bid bullshit, and the fact that Canada gets a free ride in this despite being an astoundingly shitty team is ridiculous

It's bullshit. The US is the obvious draw here, nobody in their right mind would want to go to several different cities in Mexico right now. The US doesn't owe the leaves or mexicunts anything.

>>75176676
Also, what ever happened to the "no joint-bids" rule after Korea and Japan? I thought we were done with that shit.

>>75176594

Yeah. The unenviable honor of being cannon fodder for the big guys. Not so much Mexico, but still.

>>75176676
US hosted in the 90's it's too soon for them to host again. They wouldn't get it on their own.

Including Canada is the only way FIFA would consider the application.

>>75176732

Then Canada can take the whole thing with Mexico.

Justin Trudeau can open up the WC with 'If you lose, you win'.

>>75176674
I would still rather see US/Canada than anything involving Mexico, but maybe that's just me.

>>75176698
Maybe it's different rules but we had Poland/Ukraine jointly hosting the Euros in 2012

>>75176698
>>75176762
And Euro 2008 was Austria/Switzerland, forgot about that. And Euro 2000 was Belgium/Netherlands, though that's before Korea/Japan of course

>>75176751
No one in Canada gives two shits. And we sure as fuck aren't building 10 new stadiums for one tournament like Brazil.

Give it to Mexico.

I hope we lose the bid so Americans throw another fit

File: 6a2.png (565KB, 600x610px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 600x610px

>>75176751
>Justin Trudeau can open up the WC with 'If you lose, you win'.

>>75176732
M8, FIFA doesn't give a FUCK about Canada. The USA is one of FIFA's biggest markets and the domestic league is set to grow a significant amount over the next decade. The US is already bigger than any single country FIFA could give a WC to, adding Canada on only causes more travel and broadcasting issues.

The USA by itself should have ALWAYS been the right choice. It should have been the right choice for 2022 before African and Middle Eastern nations decided to fuck the US over.

>>75176762
I was under the impression that it was just for WCs, as it is a more global event and possibly difficult to host among several nations. But I know little about the politics of Euro 2012 so I don't know what happened there, just that the EU boycotted or threatened to do it or something.

>>75176781
Again, it's possible that the Euro has different rules for co-hosting. Not hard to imagine IMO.

makes no sense, both Mexico and US are massive and could host easily it on their own

joint bids are for small countries, maybe Netherlands/Belgium some day,

>>75177551
Mexico is a shit option anyway. If they were to get the WC all to themselves, unless they solve the crime issues the country would be in the absolute shitter.

In 2026, there will be no Mexicans in Mexico.
They all will move to New Mexico 2.0 and New China 2.0.

>>75176105
Is there realistically anyone else who can take it?

File: 1490978087594.jpg (273KB, 496x521px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 496x521px

>>75176812
A
FUCKING
LEAF

>>75177681
We are unironically not much better.

What Stadiums will Mexico use?
Their only nice one is the new one in Monterey. The Azteca is crappy and old

>>75176848
No, they actually do. That's kinda the reason why Canada is part of the joint bid. America would never get it on their own.

>>75179593
Omnilife and Azteca. That's it.

North American Union when?

We have more prioritys that host a shity WC so fuck of that

>>75180233
Fuck off chairo.

there also the possibility that 2026 can happen in Australia/NZ

It wil be the first time that two different Federations (OFC with NZ and AFC with the Aussies) will make a World Cup

>>75176105
Free entry boys

time to end some big soccer gm/coaches careers by getting lucky wins

>>75176624
Mexico os far better than Canada you stupid twat, Canada wouldn't even come close to qualifying if it wasn't for them possibly hosting.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (463KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1920x1080px

>>75179909
>Omnilife and Azteca. That's it.
Monterrey's BBVA

>>75180900
Unlikely. Practically no soccer-specific stadiums and only a couple of decent rectangular ones over 35,000 seats, poor timezone for television in Europe and the Americas, not a large growth area for the sport compared to North America etc.