FIFA, CONCACAF keep pushing for a world cup co-hosted by Canada,

you know why, quit playing

>>75066174
Trump thats why

England should host it. They only did it once back in the 60s, they have all the facilities ready to use too.

>>75066238
They get embarrassed every wc you want to embarrass them at home?. Too much pressure fuck them for leaving the EU.

>what is the North American Union
>globalists
>black helicopters
>water filters
because globalists. soccer unites the world.

>>75066238
You just want us to get spanked at home m8, just leave the league to us and let Spain have it.

>>75066259
Reddits leaking

>>75066293
this

using sports to ease in the idea of north american super state

fuck the globalists

Fuck that shit. The workd cup should rotate between Europe, Asia, and Africa so it's in the worst possible time zones when the games are live here.

>>75066174
>Canada
>US

The FIFA (tm) World Cup (c) played on artificial turf with a baseball mound in the middle of it. That'd be sweet.

>Mexico
That'd actually be sweet. I'd figure Maradona might come back and play, if you know what I mean.

>>75066238
Agreed. I'd like to see England-Germany in Anfield, or Nigeria-Japan in Old Trafford. Those would be fun.

>>75066358
Blud, England games would be played at Wembley.

>>75066294
Nah you'd be great hosts. Travels from stadium to stadium would be 6h long at most, lingua franca, not a dime needing to be wasted on construction. And who's to say England can't get good until 2026.

>>75066344
The last one here was on grass, you know that right?

>Canada, America & Mexico co-hosting

.....do they even understand how much fucking land this is? Hosting it in Canada alone would be enough of a travel burden

>>75066174

Probably to make room for the 60 team World Cup

>>75066174
Does Canada even have enough appropriate outdoor stadiums?

Leafs are a hockey nation, they mostly build indoor hockey arenas

>>75066344
There are some artificial turf stadiums in Mexico, not to mention we're bombarded with ads every 5 seconds.

>>75067885
This sounds reasonable, but I still think it would be a mess, I mean, who would get the Final? Stadio Azteca? Cowboy's stadium?

>>75067958
Obviously we'd get it

>>75067885
So what?
We can host a 3000 team world cup with all of our stadiums

>>75067939
No
Probably why we have to share
Especially since the new CONCACAF president is a leaf

>>75066174
Share what faggot

>>75067980
>We can host a 3000 team world cup with all of our stadiums
What about revenue? Maybe I'm wrong, but I think lesser team matches could get better revenue if they're played outside the main territory.

>>75068023
What do you mean?
It's a world cup
People are going to show for them
We still have the record for highest total attendance for a world cup and our world cup had 12 less games than the ones that followed it

I hope they don't have any games in Boston traffic will be shit

>>75066174

Well to be fair the last WCs played in Mexico (86) and USA (94) were pretty good.

i think we've seen the last world cup.

>>75068068
I think you should have it to be honest, Mexico has too much shit going on to really enjoy a WC right now, but I think what the brit said was reasonable.

>>75068148
What shit is going on in Mexico right now that wasn't going on in 1986?

>>75068197
Social Media

>>75068197
All of them heading north

So which cities would host? Ive picked 12 since Russia has 11 (moscow has two stadiums hosting games)

>Canada
Vancouver
Calgary
Toronto
Montreal

>USA
Los Angeles
New York
Seattle
Orlando
Boston
Dallas

>Mexico
Mexico City
Guadalajara

>>75068197
Being serious:
Corruption is getting uncovered lately, relationships between cartels and government is decaying, poor people are being used as tools for different parties in the south (this hasn't changed tho, but now they're literally killing themselves). In other words, they're going to spend a lot and will never use the money on something useful, not to mention than only like 3 cities are going to benefit from it.

Being silly:
Social media outcry over "more important things that soccer" that will probably lead to violent protests, unavoidable "sick burns" about Donald Trump.

On the bright side:
No need to build new stadiums.

>>75068423
Monterrey and Tijuana are also viable.

>>75068433
Thanks i dont know much about mexico. I think having 4 cities in each country might be optimal

Lion's share of games should be in the US but it's not terrible to throw Canada and Mexico a few meme games

>>75068423
How about no Mexican or Canadian cities because this is a worse idea than giving Qatar a world cup?

>>75068521
Yeah it is

>>75068547
Why? Vancouver, Calgary, and Montreal have proven to be good host of the Olympics. Mexico is more soccer crazed then USA and Canada.

>>75068589
Because it's a pain in the ass for travel
If the US or Mexico hosted it you could figure out ways to prevent teams from having to travel cross-country but that's impossible now
Olympics are almost all in one location

World Cup will only work in North America if all of the game are held in east coast US cities, and maybe a few in Toronto/Montreal

>>75068622
you could centralize group locations
No way they could get away with only giving one coast games

>>75068620
Why not just do what >>75068653 suggests and keep the group centralized?

>>75066174
it's an absolute disaster for attending fans, these retards are going to destroy football competitions

>>75066293
what?? I HATE SAWKER NOW!

>>75068677
Politics
See if you centralize the groups you'd also have to give the final to neither New York or LA
That's hard enough on its own
But Mexico will want a semi and probably Canada too since they won't host the final
Then you have to satisfy every host city in the US

>>75068741

It would obviously need to be played in LA

>warm year round
>Mexicans
>...
>Mexicans

>>75068777
You can't have the final in LA without having a team travel cross-country for the final

>>75068620
>Group A:
Vancouver
Calgary
Seattle
LA

>Group B:
Dallas
Mexico City
Tijuana
Guadalajara

>Group C:
Montreal
Toronto
New York
Boston

During the group stages, groups could be placed in these regions. Once the group stages are over Give the big games to the biggest cities.
>LA
>New York
>Toronto
>Mexico City.

The final should obviously be hosted in USA, It could be in LA for instance.

Just my brain storming. I think it could work, Most of these cities would be happy hosting a group stage. Save the big games for the biggest cities.

>>75068795
>Let's fuck over most of the US
You just made the travel during the knockout stages even worse

>>75066358
Or Pakistan vs Israel in london.

>>75068827
most of the US doesn't care for the sport, so it's fine

>>75068827
they play 1 game a week. im sure they can handle it

>>75068874
That puts no games within a 2 hour drive for like 80% of the country

>>75068881
It's two
That has a very bad effect on the soccer

>>75068888
>>75068888
What your argument here? You want it all on the east coast to reduce travel, right? If Thats the case then "that puts no games within a 2 hour drive for 80% of the country". Youre contradicting yourself.

>>75068888
Oh well. I still don't see a problem here, most there wouldn't care about going to a game. And those that do and live there can start saving up now.

Avoiding Turf stadiums while trying to hit as many regions as possible

Mexico City (Azteca)
Guadalajara (Estadio Chivas)
Los Angeles (Rose Bowl)
Seattle (Century Link Field)
Dallas (Cotton Bowl)
Miami (Orange Bowl)
Washington DC (Fed Ex Field)
Kansas City (Arrowhead Stadium)
Chicago (Soldier Field)
Toronto (BMO Field)
New York (Metlife Stadium)
Foxboro (Gillette Stadium)

>>75068958
No
Who the fuck would want a east coast only cup?
You can pick 16 strategic locations to basically be centers and play everything regionally, expanding further and further until you get to the final in Jerry World
Unfortunately that's impossible given the spread between 3 countries

>>75069026
That leaf's plan avoid so of the biggest MLS cities
You're also fucking over those communities who won't get tourism dollars

>>75069041
Fuck anyone who thinks this is a good enough idea to come up with stadium plans

>>75069041
>>75069068
Also you can play with grass over turf
Just don't half ass it like they do for those friendlies

>>75069048
How is that any different to what i listed here ?>>75068795 The only difference is that all the games are in america which leads me to believe the whole basis of argument was simply your desire to rid Canada and Mexico of their games because of some issue you have with them.

>>75069093
Because you gave knockout games to only 4 cities that are too fucking far apart

Also I don't think the US should share solely because we should be too prideful to share a world cup

2026 FIFA World Cup. Fight and Win.

>>75069122
Those were just example cities. The point is to keep it centralized.
>Also I don't think the US should share solely because we should be too prideful to share a world cup
All you had to say was this.

>>75069122
Well it's too bad this is the globalist's sport, not america's sport.

>>75069189
I wanted it more regionalized I guess

The "Only give the east coast a world cup" is a big movement in itself too
But yes
The US should not have to share a world cup
I would rather never get it again then have to suffer the indignity of sharing

>>75069192
This is the United States of America

We don't fucking share