So is this the Patriots second dynasty or are we still on

File: 1475294618750.png (73KB, 500x441px)

73KB, 500x441px

courtesy of Nate Dirt

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-patriots-are-the-nfls-greatest-dynasty/

All time dynasty

Meh, they went ten years between titles, so I'd say that's a long enough gap for this to be considered a second dynasty. They're definitely the team of the decade for the 00s and the 10s though.

>>74121836
Mawahahhhahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahhabelipooooooppppp on ur face

Best team ever

>>74121877
Good post

The more important question is whether or not they can pull off the unprecedented feat of winning two owls in three years on two separate occasions.

They already did it early in Brady's career. They already won in SB49. They already won in SB51. Now they can actually get it done by winning again in SB52.

NFL 2010'S TEAM OF THE DECADE POWER RANKINGS(2010-PRESENT)

MULTIPLE OWL WINS
1. PATRIOTS

OWL WIN
2. SEAHAWKS
3. BRONCOS
4. PACKERS
5. RAVENS
6. GIANTS

CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP
7. 49ERS
8. STEELERS
9. FALCONS
10. PANTHERS

CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP
11.COLTS
12. CARDINALS
13. JETS
14. BEARS

DIVISIONAL ROUND APPEARANCE

15. TEXANS
16. CHIEFS
17. SAINTS
18. COWBOYS
19. CHARGERS

PLAYOFF BERTH
20. BENGALS
21. LIONS
22. EAGLES
23. VIKINGS
24. REDSKINS
25. DOLPHINS
26. RAIDERS

NO PLAOFF BERTHS

27. BILLS
28. TITANS
29. BUCCANEERS
30. RAMS
31. JAGUARS
32. BROWNS

Still on the first one. The team will go downhill when Belichick retires. I'm not a Pats fan by any means but they're a SB caliber team with or without Brady (obviously much more with).

>>74122084
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>>74122084
Fuck I forgot Cutler and Brandon Marshall made an NFC championship game lmao

File: kermit.jpg (17KB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 300x200px

>>74122084

>Bengals
>5 playoff appearances since 2010
>can't even get to the divisional round
>even the Jets, Bears, 49ers and Texans have a playoff win

Jesus Christ

>>74118853
>gives Trump more of a chance than most predictors
>called a shill

I don't get it. His polling concerns were from a statistical standpoint. He never said Trump never had a chance to win. I read most of the articles and the most wrong he was was on the Bernie Michigan win because it was even MORE improbably than Trump's GE win, and he even called into question poor polling methods. Do people not read or do they just like to meme?

>>74122410
Don't bother man, /pol/tards don't know how to read anything but memes.

>>74122422
You're right. 9 years on this shit site and the memeing has made this place a politicized shithole, but at this hour I don't even care I'm feeding into it.

I'm drunk

>>74121836

How did they lose 2007.

>>74122029

You mean 3 in 4 years?

>>74118313
>So is this the Patriots second dynasty or are we still on the first one?
It will be a second one if they win next season or the season after that.
You have to win 3 times within 5 years.

>>74123107
one very very lucky reception

>>74118313
Same dynasty.
During the years without an Owl win, they still went to 2 more Owls and consistently made the CCG. There was no shit years spent rebuilding and missing the playoffs.

>>74118313
its 2 inside of 1 long one

>>74123122
No

>>74118313
We're in uncharted waters because this dynasty is so long.

I think of it as Brady-Belichick Era I and Era II

>>74121836
Yeah, fair enough. Two dynasties, they just both happen to have Belichick and Brady. Sort of like how the Yankees won 3 titles in the 1940s and 4 titles in the 1950s, all with Berra and Stengel

>>74129203
San Antonio and the Yankees have both done the same thing.

>>74129232
*Could even argue that the Yankees did it a second time, with Jeter/Rivera/Pettite

Titles in '96, '98, '99, '00, '09
Appearances in '96, '98, '99, '00, '01, '03, '09

>>74129260
>San Antonio and the Yankees have both done the same thing.

Popovich-Duncan is a Belichick-Brady type combination.

The Yankees, though are different because the only constant was Derek Jeter, who was far from ever being the most important player on the team.

>>74129550
Hmmm