7.2 with a width of 5.6. Are thede goof measurements? Whats your opiniom and why.
Pic related.
>>24699836
You have really hot cock!
someone either jamed their ruler into their pelvic bone or measured from their nutsack.
also, there are probably 15 other threads you could have put this in
>>24699879
>someone either jamed their ruler into their pelvic bone
Oh you mean the way all the studies do it? Looks about right to me, OP. Really big and impressive.
>>24699879
I think that, in the same way we ask for timestamps to girls, we should start asking for dick pics with a freaking measuring tape or a ruler.
Damn, it's getting annoying all these faggots claiming to have more inches they do.
Oh, and I will save you time answering faggots:
"Yeah, yeah, blah, blah, I'm insecure, I have a micropenis and I'm so jealous. Sigh."
>>24699894
kek, you baby dicked fucks kill me. OP looks legit 7 and change to me in lengrh, also likely underreported on girth.
You are insecure.
You have a micro penis.
You are very jelly.
Oh, and I will save you time answering faggot.
Dick next to timestamped dollar or gtfo
>>24699836
you look like 6 inches or slightly above 6
>>24699836
That is a very nice cock anon <3
10/10 would suck
>>24699894
>when a gay guy says he has 8 inches
Here's a different view.
>>24701795
post a video of you jerking
I give it a C grade.
>>24699836
1. Not you.
2. It's not that long, quit exaggerating.
3. Learn basic geometry before making up measurements. Width of 5.6 would mean it was almost as wide as it is long. The correct term is circumference.