What's /soc/'s criteria for rating people? i.e. What

0/10 u ugly
10/10 u hot

>>24532918
For me it's like
1 - Elephant man
2 - Can barely look at you, serious deformities
3 - Ugly but looks human
4 - Off putting in one way or multiple small ways
5 - Normal, not especially ugly or attractive, just normal
6 - Attractive in a tame way, not going crazy for you but dateable
7 - Reaching fuckable status, not the "ideal" but I would
8 - Hot, would throw you onto the bed without hesitation at this rating
9 - Extremely attractive, to the point of nearly intimidating me
10 - What are you doing on 4chan

2 - ugly
3 - quite unattractive
5 - normal, as in moderately attractive
7 - attractive enough to stand out
8 - model tier

5 is average passerby on the street. Lower is actively Avery my eyes with some level of furvor, higher is the Google to some degree.

>>24533775
>Lower is actively Avery my eyes with some level of furvor, higher is the Google to some degree.
What