Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Lets say you only look at girls 6/10 or higher. Thats about 40% of the pool.
Lets say the girls only look at 6/10 or higher guys. Thats about 40% of the pool.
Lets say there's a 50% chance of liking each other and talking.
Lets say there's a 75% chance of getting a successful date.
Lets say there's 75% chance of getting sex after.
40% * 40% * 50% * 75% * 75%
That's roughly 1/22 chance. Not a bad chance if you're very social. It means, every 22nd girl you meet, you will get a successful fuck with this simple math.
In practice, it means if you meet 2 doable girls every day. Thats 1 fuck every 11 days, guaranteed with math. Not a bad chance if you're actually looking.
A high end tier toy costs about $1000. If you're making about $100 a day from work. You can get the same or better result after 10 days. This also means you can keep it forever with minimal maintenance.
Tell me /soc/ whats your success rate like? Is it better than 1/22? If not, why not toys?
>>
>Lets say the girls only look at 6/10 or higher guys. Thats about 40% of the pool.
Population based "statistics" don't work on the individual. Here, either you are >6/10 or <6/10. And using your maths, that would result as a 100% or a 0% respectively.
Also ugly people can get laid too so your numbers are off.
Also you forgot to factor in the percentage of people in your demographic that are taken and monogamous.
Also my success rate is 100% because I have a SO who doesn't turn down sex.
>>
>>24041053
everyone's idea of >6/10 is different. If the standard of beauty was same, then you'd be correct. However its not the case. Some find fat guys attractive, some skinny. Some cute, some serious. Etc.
This is why personal >6/10 works fine
>>
>>24041006
My success rate is zero...
>>
>>24041006
Wh-what is that booty?
Thread posts: 5
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1