ATTN: Grills: In terms of dicks, what's more important

>>23607414
Form or function? seriously?
Who'd rather a pretty dick that doesn't work, I mean there is no use for it.

A dick that works is the only option. What are you just going to stare at it while you furiously masturbate?

>>23607414
function of course. best fuck I've ever had was a guy with a 5" cock that had a nearly 90 degree upward bend. I almost laughed when I first saw it. but a few seconds of that thing raking across my g-spot and I'll tell you no one has made me cum like him.

I've had some beautiful cocks... straight, veins, long, thick but nothing did it like Mr. Right Angle.

File: 30d3ce1c40eb3c40ffaf874e885dd8540702fa51ea4ac25af09ebb7f3b56cee0_1[1].gif (2MB, 325x438px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 325x438px

>>23607422
Size or endurance basically

A big beautiful dick that doesn't get fully erect and lasts 5 minutes

Or a 5 inch dick that gets hard, stays hard and lasts 20 minutes, multiple rounds

>>23607432
Again, that answer is painfully obvious.

Why would anyone want a dick that can't get fully erect? I don't care what your dick looks like when its in me as long as it's clean before it is.

>>23607414
Obviously a smaller dick that works, what a retarded question

this question is autistic.
it answers itself, that's like saying would you want a broken vagina you can't penetrate?

>>23607432
Why do people post answers like this? It looks like you want to make it seem like big cocks don't ever work, only small ones. Yes. Some big cocks don't work, some small cocks do. Likewise, some big cocks work, some small cocks don't.

Is it pity for average/small penises?