Porn preferences thread. Favorite types of porn? Has porn shaped

At this point I'm largely into violent rape and other such stuff. Also a girl, not hugely into interracial.

>>23572636
is it true that most girls have rape fetishes?

And I'm pretty sure most interracial porn (the BM/WF kind anyway) is for white males.

>>23572559
I'm straight, Gay Porn makes me vomit, but for some reason Bi Threesome for some reason gets me hard as fuck.

>>23572559
Favorite types of porn?
>sissy stuff mainly

Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
>Not really. It's kinda weird how I literally have no desire to actually do sissy stuff, but it's always my go to for porn

Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
>Uncommon? yes, but I wouldn't say its strange for a women to do so

Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
>yea, but just as much as anything else. It's not the huge fiasco it's made out to be

I'm a woman I enjoy drugged/sleeping girl or rapeplay porn. Also milf sometimes bc I'm olderish and young hot guys with older girls is nice.

Most porn is produced for men. That's why a lot of men think stuff like rape and all kinds of weird shit is more normal than it is.

Porn shapes sexuality by giving people these unrealistic and biased expectations.

>>23572559
Name?

One of my favorite types of porn is extremely difficult to find. Interracial porn is common, but is usually black guys and white girls. I love black girls fucking white guys... specifically when they get really fucking dirty and beg to be dominated by white cock. When they scream "fuck that nigger pussy!" and such. Instant diamonds.

>>23573199
I like the milf thing too... but more because my first was in her mid 30's

>>23572559
Favorite types of porn?
>huge natural tits/DP/Gangbang

Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
>yes, i think so, i've done some MMF threesome with my ex and we both loved it, shame that i didnt had the chance to dped her (she wasnt that much into anal), i want to it again, not in sort of open relationship, but just bring some unknow people and use them as toys for us.

Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
>uncommon ? Hmmm i'd say yes, at least in my country and in my circle of friends, just a few girls watch porn, most of them find it disgusting, but i'm sure some girls can be addicted to porn.

Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
>i don't know, the statistic with pornhub tend to show that women love lesbian porn/squirt/threesome and only after "black"

http://www.pornhub.com/insights/women-gender-demographics-searches

i"m a 26 straight M btw

>>23572559
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Most women have watched porn at some point. Not sure if most women get off to it or look at it regularly when they're by themselves. I do, but I feel like I might be atypical. A lot of women just watch porn to laugh at it with their friends, or as a kind of foreplay with their sex partners.

>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I'm fine with porn where not everyone is the same race, if that's what you mean. White, Black, Asian, it's all good. Penises are penises and vaginas are vaginas.

If you mean the actual genre of 'interracial' porn, where the race of the participants is made out to be a big deal and the focus of the scene, then no. Stupid shit like that is a huge turn-off... at worst it's horribly racist and offensive, but most of the time it's just fucking goofy and takes me out of the scene. No one acts that way IRL.

>>23573629
When was the last time that you got off to pron?
Do you do it alone or with your partner?

>Favorite types of porn?
threesome I guess

>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
I don't think so. I'm a virgin though.

>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
I'm a girl and I watch a lot of porn but I'm not sure if this is normal

>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I can only speak for myself, but I'm not into it

>>23573229
Pretty much this. It's all just an exercise in straight men trying to guess what people want, but they are limited by their own minds, so it's largely just a collection of what they want to see.

Interracial (black guy, white girl) is generally my favorite type of porn. But it has to be amateur, not industry stuff. Black guys just fuck better, so it makes me cum harder if I masturbate to it.

21 y/o white girl here.

>>23572559
>Favorite types of porn?
Foot fetish
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Most probably since I'm pretty kinky and have only ever had vanilla sex irl
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
I wouldn't know, I don't see why not

I rather see amateur, it's better because it seems so natural and I always get some ideas when I see that kind of porn to practice it with my partner.

>>23573935
How old are you anon? Do you have that preference in real life too?

>>23573715
I can't remember ever watching porn with a partner. It's more just something I've heard of other women doing.

I haven't gotten off to porn in a few weeks now. It all depends on my mood. Sometimes I like live-action porn, sometimes I like hentai, sometimes I like reading erotica, sometimes I just like to lie in bed and get off to my own fantasies... it's a cycle. Right now I'm in one of the imagination-only phases, so I haven't really needed anything to get off to.

>>23573935
>Black guys just fuck better, so it makes me cum harder if I masturbate to it.

Really?

>>23572559
>Favorite types of porn?
Anal, interracial, efro
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Actually, I already liked what I like before porn. It just gave me an outlet.
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Yes, aside from a small minority of freaky nymphomaniac women.
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I've read that the biggest consumers of it are white males. I'm a white male, and I love interracial porn, even though I am fairly racist and against it in real life.

>>23573935
>Black guys just fuck better
That's a stereotype, and is what interracial porn plays off of. For that reason, people like >>23573629 who are not against interracial sex in general don't like the stereotyping and fetishization that IR porn involves.

>>23573935
...this is b8, ppl.

File: 1443254806426.jpg (160KB, 828x686px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 828x686px

>ctrl+F cuck
>no results

>>23572559
Watching porn has taught me exactly how to make a sex

>>23574731
Cuckolding isn't that popular really

>>23574909
In the big picture no, but on 4chan it is.

>>23575039
everything humiliating is popular between subhumans

And I just happen to stumble on a post about cucking in the gender question thread.

>>23574909
Well of course it's not popular, after all it's the thinking man's fetish.

>Favorite types of porn?
I dunno man. Lesdom and weird /d/-tier hentai shit.
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Nope. I'm a disgusting cishet who has no fetishes to speak of.
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Not at all. Every single other chick I've met has watched porn.
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I'm not, despite having a preference for dat coffee-n-cream brown, specifically because it's fetishy as fuck and incredibly awkward to watch. Amateur stuff between actual couples is fine.

>Favorite types of porn?
Bisexual threesomes, 2 guys and a girl. The opposite is also nice, but currently i'm more into the first one. You know, why would you have to choose women or men when you can have both?

Also into female foot fetish, sweat, spit, voyeur and body odor. Sometimes I like pissing too.

>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
More or less. It's usually hard to make my fetishes come true.

>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Yeah, it its because society. But I see no problem at all.

>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
Can't confirm, but I'd go with the second option.

>>23575075
It's not popular among women
For obvious reasons

>>23574709
it's actually not bait, I'm being serious. from my experiences black guys fuck better, maybe it's just the men I pick, idk. but that's been my experience. sorry for ID change I'm not home.

>>23574482
see above :) and I'm 21.

>>23575486
Where are you from? In my experience most white girls with a black guy thing admit that they aren't good long term partners.

>>23575541
my current boyfriend is wonderful and he's black (we're also long term), it just depends on the person, I think. in comparison to my white exes they don't even compare to him. it's less of a race thing and more of an individual person thing.

>>23575541
oh oops and I'm from the US (PA)

>>23575554
>>23575560
Time will tell.

>>23575563
mhm, only time will tell, but as for the past three years we've been doing well. here's to another three more haha

I'd find it really difficult to trust a girl who was really into porn. Especially if she was hooked on interracial stuff.

I like mostly niche fetish stuff, a lot of which isn't even porn. Youtube videos and the like.

I'd like to wean myself off of it, but I don't think I could just up and delete it. I've got a collection spanning years, most of which can no longer be found anywhere on the internet. Maybe I'll get an external hard drive and put it all on there.

>>23572559
Wife is gorgeous but has tiny tits with perfect ass. Porn definitely turned me into a boob guy which sucks.

All things anal.
Lots of girls don't want to though

>>23573102
>straight

I watch porn like a sports fan watches ESPN.
(I've always want to act in porn, but I realized the pay is shit and the women are broken. ).

Since I'm a big fan of watching women have orgasms, I like when the women themselves are the ones doing the filming/photography. Aka self shot porn

>>23575711
Had irl experience? I'm considering trying and I'm looking for tips.

>>23575926
I'd say it's something that
requires lots of patience, preparation, communication and lubrication

from both the ends of the spectrum.
That shouldn't be difficult. In fact it should

Erection control helps like I'd usually stick it in when I'm semi-erected then I'll pump slowly to regain hardness. This helps avoid forcing and bruising the girls ass.

File: justin_fox_marketa_cacia_zoo_bedroom2-640x428.jpg (58KB, 640x428px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 640x428px

>Favorite types of porn?
probably russian and chezch girls
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
yeah thanks to all the interracial stuff as a white male i know believe white women dont find white men attractive and i have even tried to hit on a white girl in years. This probably had the most profound effect on me. After seeing that interracial porn then i see those couples irl it has taken a pretty big tole on my self worth being white and all. Im white and have a nice beard/defined jaw, but i hate my skin color now that i see women find black men more sexually attractive. Basically it has also led me to think my dick is small AF, but i think its average based on actual stats, but i think its small(6.5x5). I could probably never marry a white women now that i have seen all this and its sad because i like my own race the best. But we got asian women in the tech field so ill probably end up with one of them if i end up with anything.
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Would you watch lots of porn if sex came to you?
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I mean in real life you do see white women with non white men, so i guess they do. BM/WW is a common theme irl.

>>23576709
The fuck is wrong with you dude? I agree white women say some pretty shitty things about white men sometimes but most of them still have a preference for white guys.

Don't let the loud obnoxious types get to you that badly.

>>23576709
Women prefer black guys because they tend to be more masculine, confident and outgoing. I think if you tried to work on those personality traits then women wouldn't care about your skin color.

23/F

>Favorite types of porn?
Lesbian. Anal.
But I do watch everything, if the acting is not TOO ridiculous.

>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Not really, no. It didn't change my taste or expectations in guys or sex.
I guess I just learnt how to give head a bit better, and that's pretty much it.

>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Depends on your definition of "lots". I don't think I am extremely weird but I do watch porn regularly, once or twice a week.

>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I don't like interracial porn. If race is not the focus on the scene I may watch it, but 99.9% of the porn I watch is with white people.

>>23576720
i doubt they do
>>23576736
well im nothing like black guys and i never will be, hence im not trying for white women. I was raised in upper middle class America, private schools, vacations every year, and Im a soft spoken white male.

my favourite porn is femdom but i have no wish to be severely hurt during sex

>>23576736
What planet are you people living on? Black men cater to fetishists primarily. Outside of that they're generally marked down for their race by most average white women. Just look at dating surveys.

White women who prefer black men do exist, sure. But remember like all fetishists they're loud as fuck about it and try to speak for their entire group. Think of men who are into traps and constantly go on about how great they are and how all men like traps deep down for a similar example.

>>23576808
Women don't necessarily like black men for their race, but for the personality traits that they usually have. Traits that white guys tend to lack, usually due to upbringing. Of course there are always exceptions, but the fact is that black guys tend to embody everything that a woman desires in a sexual partner.

>>23576841
That's nice but the statical evidence of just about every dating survey says otherwise. White people in the United States have the most pronounced same race preference.

>>23572559
mostly pov, prefer average and older women doing the work

>>23576841
I some cases yes, but most of us black men aren't really going that far for white chicks (that's no to say we don't date or fuck them on occasion).

It all about the vibes you put out.

>>23576947
You have a preference for them.

Compare the attitude of white men to black women to black mens attitude to white women. Only a tiny portion of white men would think black women are as attractive as white women.

White men just aren't interested in black women by and large. You can't say the same wrt black men and white women.

>>23572559
>Favorite types of porn?
Mostly stuff that degrades women. Facials (especially if the woman hates taking it on her face), hard painal, whipping/spanking
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
No. I knew I was bi long before I watched any porn
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
lots of porn? yes. some porn? maybe. most women I've talked to about this subject say they get off more with erotic literature than porn
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
The women I have talked to are generally not interested in interracial stuff.

>>23573544
I'm 29 so not really that old but the age gap of 18-21 is appealing. Men my age start going for younger why not us as well. Younger are more enthusiastic and we are much more appreciative on our end.

>>23576736
I actually do not like men outside my own race(white). Very rarely will I find maybe a Hispanic or Asian mam attractive. I mean there are exceptions but I prefer light skin and dark hair.

And yeah most porn is made for men. I can spend hours trying to find one I enjoy. The men tend to not be attractive in all honesty. Attractive face and slim/ottermode body over muscular or big dick. Usually porn is the latter.

>>23576993
I'd say white women are i

n my Top5 tied for 3rd with northern Asian girls. That's not to say I don't like white girls, in fact Ive met some white girls that I found extremely attractive. It's all about the vibes.

I've met a lot of white guys who had a black girlfriend and I met tons of black women who've dated WM. Believe me you'd be surprised if you stepped in NYC.

And As for BM x WW
Only a small handful of us get super-love struck over a WW (luckily I'm not in that handful).

But it's all about the type Vibes you put out.

ALL women love good vibration (if they didn't the sex toy industry would go belly up).

>>23575459
I dunno, I think it would be. I mean, I sure wouldn't mind a girlfriend who's into cuckqueaning.

>>23575092
give me dat kik

>>23577125
where would I go to find more women like you? I'm under 21 and have a thing for older women

File: Reply-By-Race-Male.png (35KB, 493x524px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 493x524px

>>23576709
>women find black men more sexually attractive
They don't.

>>23577475
theres an age gap thread

mostly i meet people through gaming/coding communities but maybe if you use dating sites/apps search for them?

I only hook up with guys who don't watch a lot of porn, the difference sexually is so noticeable that I won't even bother with a guy who watches porn because I know I'm going to leave unsatisfied

Rape, MtFs fucking females, beast stuff.

>>23577530
Speaking as a guy who used to be addicted to porn, I don't blame you. It's not an irreversible thing though.

I'd like to think if you loved a man you could help him through it.

>>23572559
My favorite types of porn is female masturbation, undressing/striptease and (more recently) tickling.

No, it hasn't shaped my view of sexuality in any way.

I suppose it may be different from person to person, man or woman.

Porn is for degenerates

>>23577556
Yeah that's why I said hook up, I could definitely date a porn user and especially if he was someone who wanted to kick the porn habit, hopefully we would be having enough sex that he wouldn't feel like he needed it as often ;) Also I'm very vocal in bed about what feels good and what doesn't, I don't fake orgasms or let guys get away with not getting me off so I think I could do it

>>23572559
I'm like a chameleon in bed.
I always ask what she likes, if she'd be fine with certain things.
Sex is sex. If I love her I do whatever she's fine with. Vanilla mostly, sometimes rough, outdoors, my ex was into sm because of me. She was ok with me pushing some boundaries.
My current gf likes it pretty much vanilla. Fucking fine with that, haven't lost the grip to reality unlike many others.

File: derp.jpg (31KB, 647x108px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 647x108px

>>23577599
>most men are degenerates

>Favorite types of porn?
Big clits, pissing, masturbation, black girls, lactation, JAV, drunk girls, drunk girls pissing, still shots of naked girls, 'arty' porn, eroge, h-manga, anything with tan-lines, ftm twinks, comedic porn, big boobs, shaved heads, hairy armpits, shaving pubes, ftm x mtf, dwarf girls, mmf threesomes, one piece swimsuits.

>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Yeah I remember being like 13 and not having any material so I had a wank to the front cover of a PS2 Magazine because the character (Vaan, FFXII) was bare-chested. So porn has at least saved me from situations like that.

>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
My personal experience has been that most girls watch porn, just not in the same volume that men do.

>>23572559
I'm mostly into vanilla. My fetish is breeding sex. It always frustrates me when porn has "deep inside" in the title and it's either anal or he just has the head inside when he comes.

>>23577895
Another fetish is seeing women aroused or satisfied with the sex they are receiving. I would definitely go for a partner that knows what they want and is ready to make it known. I don't think I'd keep watching porn in a relationship if I had a partner who preferred and asked if I could stop for them or simply removed the need to watch porn entirely.

>>23576743
marry me, I watch "everything butt" a lot but they do weird stuff sometimes with fisting and enemas and i'm not into it that much.

>>23578703
oh I also watch masturbation too because I feel too much like a loser if it's a guy giving it good to a hot girl. I end up thinking, "that's what I should be doing. god i'm so alone :("

>>23573199
Sleeping girl stuff can be hot af.

>>23572559
>Favorite types of porn?
Rough sex and humiliation stuff, amateur with really loving smiley couples, MMF and gangbangs, sometimes lesbian or solo male can be hot
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
I think it's made me a lot less naive compared to a lot of my friends. I remember when we were about 17 one girl telling me she was freaked out by her bf wanting to cum on her face, and I was like, well of course he wants that lol, isn't that what guys enjoy?
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Yes and I don't even watch that much. I'm sure men watch more porn than women though. Having said that there is a huge market for trashy erotic novels aimed at women.
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I think it's mostly trolling but some IR I've seen is hot, I am mostly into white guys though so not something I seek out

>>23580198
Do you ever want to settle down and have kids?

>>23580328
Settle down yes, kids nope. What made you ask?

>>23580333
I love rough sex and humiliation. I'm pretty sure porn shaped it to be that way since it's so exaggerated and extreme, slapping a girl around, beating her, throatfucking etc. That kind of thing.

As a result I often wonder if women into the same sorts of thing are the type who want to settle down. My first girlfriend was into it, as were a few FWBs, but I don't have a big sample size.

>>23580360
Yeah I definitely want to settle down in a typical sweet loving romantic relationship that everyone dreams of, I'll just the guy in question to treat me like shit in the bedroom from time to time.

>>23580363
>treat me like shit

Given that we're all anonymous, give me the worst two or three desires you have along these lines.

And how old are you?

>>23580370
I'm 29. The worst tend to be dirty to the extent that I don't fantasise about them within the context of a relationship. It's stuff like being passed around a rowdy rugby team who use me as their evening's entertainment. If you're taslking stuff that could be done with a bf, I like being spat on, and much as I love receiving pleasure I love it sometimes when a guy just doesn't give a shit about my enjoyment and I have to focus entirely on what he wants. I like being embarrassed and exposed in front of a guy as well.

What were your exes like?

>>23578703
>>23578715
I really love anal but enemas and fisting are weird. I am more for fingering/rimming/anal sex. I am boring even when it comes to porn.

I kinda like masturbation too but it's hard to find good videos with guys. I find it weirdly sweet.

>>23580378
Yeah, a lot of girls get off to that feeling of just being "used" as a masturbatory aid almost.

I'm a year off of you, so I get what you mean about settling down too. Feels like you have to make this dichotomous choice between good girl who isn't into anything filthy and slutty girl who satisfies lust but isn't suitable.

My first ex got progressively into degrading sex more and more as time went on, being beaten, fucked in public, violent rape fantasies etc. Nice girl and it went on for a few years but ended pretty badly.

>I like being embarrassed and exposed in front of a guy as well.

Fuck I love this so much.

>Favorite types of porn?
Femdom, anal, lesbian, masturbation, twinks, rimjobs are some things I search for
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Maybe porn and the internets in general has made me expect males to be more kinky than most of then actually are
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
No, maybe we just dont talk about it as much. And many watch those black and white gifs on tumblr rather than porn videos. "Omg so artistic" *shlick shlick*
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I think it is a male fetish. I have watched some porn with actors who are different races but it didnt concentrate on that. A lot of interracial stuff seems kinda racist, but then I am a white girl how could I know.

>>23580578
Rimjobs are the best

>>23580578
>then I am a white girl how could I know.

What do you mean by this? Are you an SJW?

>>23572559
B!

>>23580578

>It's a male fetish

Yeah, I buy that. I've never actually met a woman who just came out and said they prefer black guys to other races. I have met several who claim to only date white guys though, so I don't know.

But yeah, there's definitely a racist aspect to most of the interracial stuff that gets thrown around, and for some people, dominating/submitting to a group of people they hate or fear is a big chunk of the appea.

I'm a girl

I enjoy dd/lg, gangbangs (especially young girl, old guys gangbangs), ladyboys/shemales with str8 guys, old men with young guys...

anyone girls have similar tastes?

>>23580751
Can you tell us about your issues with your father?

>>23580752
I don't really have any

ngl, it makes me feel bad when white women shit talk white men.

>>23580589
Yes<3

>>23580637
I just feel stupid talking about things I dont really know about. Like Im fine with objectifying women so maybe black guys think this bbc stuff is okay even though it objectifys them for example.

>>23580751
Im a guy and these also are some of my favorites.
I never thought Id find a girl with similar tastes. lol
Im curious to everything youre into.

>>23580847
Do you prefer giving or receiving rimjobs

File: 1447004708660.jpg (99KB, 347x313px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 347x313px

I'm /pol/ as fuck but my main fetish is fucking a black woman and cumming inside her while she uses no protection.

>>23580578
You sound amazing! lol.
I need to find a chick like you.
I love every one of those porn styles you watch. lol
Rimjobs are amazing!

>>23580847

Out of curiousity, when you watch femdom, do you usually imagine yourself as more dominant or submissive?

>>23580858
I suppose you would keep her oppressed and use her bastard offspring for labor right?

>>23580856
I have actually never given one so I dont really know. I guess Im more interested in it because I havent tried but receiving is awesome too.

>>23580862
Good to know others like the same stuff

>>23580871
When its straight femdom the dominant of course, when lesbian usually dominant too sometimes sub.

>>23580883
No that's terrible. I'd go for the regular Strom Thurmond method. Deny everything, keep everything secret while also financially suporting the two of them.

>>23580884

Female dominant, I'm a fan. How'd you get into being rimmed? I love giving it, but I know it's not something most people do.

>>23580887
Well you did say you were /pol/ as fuck, just trying to gauge where you are at

>>23580884
Yeah I would agree that receiving is awesome. I love rimming girls, especially when they have never had it done to them before and they realize they are super into it

>>23580890
I just hooked up with a guy once and he asked if he can lick my asshole. I said okay but he has to stop if it feels bad. It didnt feel bad at all, really enjoyed it. Sadly I have never met another person willing to do it.

>>23580906
Must be great seeing someone go from "...you want what?" to "OH GOD YES"

>>23580436
OK, she sounds more kinky than me lol

I like the more subtle psychological stuff, like yeah embarrassment, being humiliated by the guy in a private setting but knowing he's actually really happy to be fucking me, that kind of thing.

>>23580589
>>23580862
>>23580884
>>23580906
>>23580980
Rimming yay! It's amazing. And if you haven't tried giving you definitely should. Receiving is incredible but turns me into a total mush who doesn't even know what my own name is, it's so fucking intense and amazing. Giving freels super dirty and submissive :)

>>23580980
It's fanatic seeing someone to from "I dunno about this" to "HOLY SHIT NEVER STOP!"

I always make it a point to rim any girl I'm with, spreading the knowledge whatever I go. Just call me Johnny Rimjobs.

>>23581179
Couldn't agree more with you

>>23572559

>Favorite types of porn?
I have a weird kink for gay furry porn, specifically in comic form. Prefer more human than animal though, can't abide actual dog faces and paws and shit.
Other than that, I like schoolgirls (legal), anal, and occasionally lesbian stuff. I also like certain gay porn, but it's hard to find cute twinks getting railed by huge bearmode guys so I stick to comics.

>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
I first got wind of the fact that I was bi through the gfur stuff. Took me a while to "come out" to myself, but now I have accepted it as part of who I am.

>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
I'd say probably yes. They definitely watch less than men, and men watch an unhealthy amount. I'd advocate for women watching slightly more, and men watching a lot less. Too much is unhealthy, but everyone should explore their sexuality and porn is a good way to do so.

>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
Sounds like you're projecting, son.
People like all kinds of shit. I highly doubt "women", as a whole, would watch and/or participate in interracial pornography if they weren't into it on some level. Personally, I can't think of any reason why they wouldn't be into it just as much as some men are.

>>23580419
Yea it can some time to find the right video from them. I would love to try rimming but haven't been with someone who is into it :(. I guess what I like about their vids is that I can relate with the anal sex since I don't have the other parts, but with the punishment and huge insertions it gets too intense for me and I lose interest

I'm a girl into interracial porn. Just putting that out there, going to leave the thread before I get attacked.

>>23581801
Do you prefer them in real life too or purely in porn?

>>23572559
>Favorite types of porn?
Amateur as both habit and rule, but I make an exception for MomPOV, Netvideo auditions and anything starring Lisa Ann or Dana Vespoli. Sometimes EFUKT and Inhumanity have really hot stuff, like the perky bubbly Asian girl at the gloryhole or that Eastern Bloc girl who had some kind of anal-induced aneurysm.
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Really encouraged my interests in MILFs, for sure. Though it is incredibly frustrating that most of the hottest black-guy-on-white-milf videos are both cuck videos and full of cries of "gimme that nigger dick". Can't a black man fantasize about being the black man pounding an older white woman in peace?
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Not a woman, nor have I surveyed women myself, but the kinds of things women tend to talk about on the internet in a "makes me so wet" way are usually mainstream things that happen to feature hot guys doing plot-related things, e.g. Arrow or Supernatural. I haven't really seen guys talking about, say, the female cast of Suits the same way.
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
Same disclaimer as above. Xhamster is my regular site (the only UI I can actually stand from a tubesite), and there's a "female choice" tag. Obviously the G.I.R.L. effect applies, but hey, most of the videos with that tag are either lesbian (with a hefty amount of those being experimentation-themed), girls getting treated like actual sexual objects or interracial.
>>23573494
Go on xhamster, search for "HOT FUCK: Ebony girl tries swedish BWC".
>>23573229
>hat's why a lot of men think stuff like rape and all kinds of weird shit is more normal than it is.
Or maybe it's all the women admitting it's a fantasy of theirs.

>>23577516
>black women are more likely to reply to a white man than a black man
Oh, the irony

i fuck black guys cuz im not racist

>>23582148
>>23577516
That study is completely meaningless. Internet reply rates != attraction. White males are 90% of the people on these dating sites, so white males get the highest reply rates.

Females get more messages than they can handle and generally only look at the first page (about 10 messages). Statistically just about all of those 10 messages will be from white males on any given day.

>>23582367
OKC isn't 90% white guys. It's not even 40%. Read the report, they include racial breakdown, match rate and attractiveness ratings too.

>>23582571
I have, and it's majority white.

File: scores2014.png (18KB, 495x391px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 495x391px

>>23582585
No data = No argument.

>>23582612
Changing the subject = No Argument.

Even that "QuickMatch" is also explained by the fact that the site is mostly white, and you only do a limited amount of clicks. If you're exposed to 8 white profiles for every 2 non-white ones you're more likely to encounter attractive white men before you encounter attractive non-white ones. This is simple logic, and anyone trying to base reality based on weird dating sites is being foolish.

As someone who finds darker men the most attractive I already know that my inbox wouldn't reflect it in the "data" just based on the fact that virtually all of my messages are from white men and I only open up a couple on the first page in any given day.

>>23582669
If you have no data. You have no argument. We're talking about average preferences for huge population groups, not whatever your personal experiences have been and extrapolating this to literally millions of other people.

>>23582689
>If you have no data. You have no argument.
That data is not an argument, and is fundamentally flawed for many reasons.
>not whatever your personal experiences have been and extrapolating this to literally millions of other people.
That's what happens when you try to draw conclusions based on OkCupid reply rates.

>>23582669
>simple logic
>anecdotal evidence, evidence-less assertions and baseless assumptions

Loving Every Laugh.

>>23582706
If you're exposed to 8 white profiles for every 2 non-white ones you're more likely to encounter attractive white men before you encounter attractive non-white ones. This is simple logic, and how math works.

This has nothing to do with anecdotes. Were you dropped on your head when you were little?

>Loving Every Laugh.

Yes, we are.

>>23582703
Except one is one person's personal experience and the other is based on the largest dataset of dating preferences ever assembled.

If you think the concept of an in-group preference in dating is based on one study then you're wrong. It's based on numerous, mutually reinforcing studies including in person speed dating studies conducted in controlled environments. And it doesn't just apply to white women. It applies to all women. Asian women prefer Asian men, black women prefer black men and so on. These preferences only become more pronounced when you're talking about marriage, and they're even more pronounced for whites in more ethnocentric countries outside of the US (my family are polack immigrants after all).

You have your fetish, and that's cool - I'm not like /pol/ since people are free to choose who they want. Just don't try to speak for other white women.

>>23582706
>white man is mad that someone debunked his graph

>>23582716
You are assuming everyone's attention span is as limited as yours.

Now I'm not the person who initially replied to you but I do work in a mathematics intensive field and the fact preference for ones own race regardless of race is exhibited uniformly in spite of the fact OKC skews white shows your initial argument about it being reflective of a larger white sample size is bunk.

I don't think you've ever provided any evidence OK cupids male population is 80% white either. So that would be helpful if you want to move this argument along in a productive way.

>>23582730
Yep. About countries outside of the US. Look at the Boers in South Africa. Their intermarriage rates with blacks are even lower than in America despite being a small minority.

>>23582730
>Except one is one person's personal experience

I'm talking about simple math here. Let's go through it:

Another study reveals that the average good looking woman on Okcupid gets 1400% more messages than even the good looking male (and on a weekly basis it's described as "The most contacted woman had almost 17 times more messages in a week than the most contacted man"). Because they won't be able to respond to all of them, and the vast vast majority of them will be from white males, white males get the best collective responses/messages sent ratio.

This applies to "matching" too because if you're shown 20 profiles a day you're more likely to find the hunks in the group that gets the most views.

>other is based on the largest dataset of dating preferences ever assembled.

Online dating != physical attraction. OkCupid is probably one of the worst metrics you could use for how real-life works. How many OkCupid dates lead to sex? Very small minority. How many OkCupid message exchanges even lead to a date? Only a tiny amount. It's flimsy and useless to base human attraction on especially when the data is skewed.

>You have your fetish

It's not a fetish. It's my taste. Do you have "a fetish" for white women? Don't be a condescending child.

>>23582730
>If you think the concept of an in-group preference in dating is based on one study then you're wrong.

It depends on how "group" is defined. It's mostly environment based.

>>23582756
>You are assuming everyone's attention span is as limited as yours.

Look into psychological projection.

>>23582812
>and the vast vast majority of them will be from white males

You need to provide actual evidence for this claim.

>online dating is meaningless

A significant portion of millennials use it. I think I read a survey that put something like 30% of relationships beginning online.

But that's irrelevant because in person speed dating studies show the exact same thing. Even people in the social sciences acknowledge in-group preferences as default for most people now. The only question they pose is why.

>It's my taste

Highest divorce rates famalam. Of any racial pairing.

>>23582829
You ignored my main argument, which is convenient as it basically dismembers your own hypothesis about why white females rate white males higher.

>>23582833
>You need to provide evidence for this claim

This is what I've been saying all along. Her entire argument rests on something for which she hasn't provided data.

>Highest divorce rates famalam.

No reason to lower the tone. She sounds like a bit of a bitch but getting personal is just going to degrade the argument very quickly.

I would date a white girl who had dated black guys but probably not one who said she preferred them having said that.

>>23582833
>You need to provide actual evidence for this claim.

In the western world it's a basic fact that white people compromise the majority of the internet users due to simple demographics. This is because government discrimination like "Jim Crow" paired the concentration of poverty with the concentration of melanin. Or, more simply, just look at this thread: it's basically full of white men based on the defensive reaction here.

If we adjust it to US demographics about 7 messages out of 10 received will be from white males with 3 from non-white males. Facial attractiveness works on a bell curve, with the outliers on each end being below 1%. So assuming your typical woman views 10 messages on any given day (latest page of her inbox) it's much more likely for that group to have a really attractive guy then the 3 non-white men in those 10 messages. Using something flimsly like OkCupid with uneven demographics, and then trying to extrapolating it to real life is meaningless.

>>23582846
>You ignored my main argument
No I didn't.

>your own hypothesis about why white females rate white males higher.

http://www.citylab.com/politics/2013/11/uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-online-dating/7662/

This one says claims that all men universally prefer Asian women (except for Asian men who vastly prefer Latin women. This of course contradicts what you're saying. Takeaway?

Online dating "data" != is not reality.

>>23582889
We have no reason to believe it skews towards a representation of the demographic profile of the US as a whole since OK Cupids userbase are significantly younger than the median age.

>No I didn't.

By your own standards every woman should prefer white men owing to this hypothesised deluge effect. Except they don't. They prefer their own men and the only group that has a pronounced preference for an outgroup are Asian women.

>This one says claims that all men universally prefer Asian women

Men show significantly lower levels of in-group preference, this has long been established.

>>23582833
>Highest divorce rates famalam. Of any racial pairing.

Divorce rate is high regardless. Of course the more "taboo" one is going to be more affected. Are you trying to be cute or something? I can do that too. I'll drop some science:

>Women don't like pale men. Women can subconsciously pick up on what our skin tone is saying about us. Having the right amount of red/yellow or melanin is an indicator of health, and will make us appear more attractive.

Science supports the idea that women are more attracted to darker men, famalam.

>>23582846
>I would date a white girl who had dated black guys but probably not one who said she preferred them having said that.

I wouldn't date a white guy who was that insecure. Attractive men don't get jealous.

>>23582920
>We have no reason to believe it skews towards a representation of the demographic profile of the US

It's a US site. The US userbase of the site skews toward the demographic of the country, and actually beyond it because of more non-white people not having internet access.

>>23582951
Not the person you're replying to but melanin is an adaptive trait for above average sunlight climates, in below average sunlight climates pale skin synthesises vitamin D better.

I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here but it's getting difficult given the outright denigrating tone you're adopting.

>I wouldn't date a white guy who was that insecure

If a girl says she prefers another group of men to my own to which I do not belong then no shit I'm going to find it off putting. I wouldn't blame a white girl for saying the same about a white guy who claimed he preferred Asian women and avoided them accordingly either. Perhaps cuckolds are ok with such an arrangement though.

>because of more non-white people not having internet access.

Can you provide some data as to the statistical significance of this disparity? I assume you're referring to Blacks and Hispanics when you say non white.

>Not the person you're replying to but melanin is an adaptive trait for above average sunlight climates
This is actually not true. The Aleuts, Eskimos, and Maori disprove that theory. They lived in climates in colder than, at or least as cold as Europe.

>I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here but it's getting difficult given the outright denigrating tone you're adopting.
I'm just responding to the tone people are using against me.

>If a girl says she prefers another group of men to my own to which I do not belong then no shit I'm going to find it off putting.
It's insecure. Attractive men don't get jealous. Attractive people of any gender don't get jealous.

It would be like your girlfriend cutting herself or becoming all clingy because she finds out your waifu folder is full of some Asian idol. But what does that say about her? That she's not confident in herself or her own personal abilities to not be phased by it.

>Can you provide some data as to the statistical significance of this disparity?
All we know is that it would skew the whiteness of a site beyond the normal demographics of the country.

>>23583087
>This is actually not true.

Yes it is. Google vitamin D deficiencies in immigrant populations in Scandinavia.

>I'm just responding to the tone people are using against me.

By denigrating white men in a stupid and pornified way? Don't you have any brother or close male relatives?

It's humiliating and uncalled for.

>It would be like your girlfriend cutting herself or becoming all clingy because she finds out your waifu folder is full of some Asian idol.

Something similar actually happened in my dating history. Not with Asian girls but with a particular type of girl I liked that my girlfriend at the time wasn't. Looking back I can understand why she was upset and I'd also be upset if my girlfriend told me she preferred black men or had a folder full of black cocks.

>All we know is that it would skew the whiteness of a site beyond the normal demographics of the country.

We know nothing until we have data. And that's not true anyway. The normal demographics are skewed more non white by age differential.

I wouldn't date a woman who has a thing for black men.
It's kind of a red flag. It means she literally seeks out people who are more likely to abuse her. It's a sign of poor self-preservation.
http://vaw.sagepub.com/content/13/11/1094.abstract?ck=nck
If it's a fetish I don't want anything to do with it. It most likely has some sort of "black men are almost like animals and can treat me like a fuck toy" connotations associated with it which are pretty nasty.
I might be okay with it if he was a decent guy who just "happened" to be black.

Likewise, if I was a woman I wouldn't hang around with guys who actively seeks out asian women.

>>23583119
how the fuck did you go from talking about porn preferences to vitamin d deficiencies

File: pictures-of-down-syndrome-kids-awarness-month-babble.jpg (402KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 1200x900px

>insecure white men gang up on girl who has tastes that make them feel insecure
>meanwhile they all regularly fap to hentai and have porn folders of non-white women

>>23583119
>Yes it is. Google vitamin D deficiencies in immigrant populations in Scandinavia.

Again, no it's not. The Aleuts, Eskimos, and Maori disprove that theory. They lived in climates in colder than, at or least as cold as Europe. None of them evolved a lack of melanin.

>By denigrating white men in a stupid and pornified way?

I never did that.

>Something similar actually happened in my dating history. Not with Asian girls but with a particular type of girl I liked that my girlfriend at the time wasn't. Looking back I can understand why she was upset

She most likely wasn't a very attractive or mentally strong then. Attractive people are not phased in the slightest by things like that, because their sense of worth comes from within. Do you think Brad Pitt loses sleep over black men?

>We know nothing until we have data.
We know that it's, at minimum, about 65-70% with a skew beyond that. The skew makes no actual difference — whether it's 2% or 15% the majority is still white regardless.

>>23583218
Inuits vitamin D intake wasn’t dependent upon the sun. They get all that they need from their diet, heavy on types of fatty fish that are naturally rich in vitamin D. The plentiful amounts of the vitamin kept them from developing less melanin. In fact, before milk was fortified with D, people living outside of Northern Canada and Alaska loaded their diets with fishy products, such as cod liver oil, to get their daily supplement. So despite their chilly climate and lack of sun exposure, it’s the Inuit diet that has kept them in their natural glow.

also I'm not really sure what you're arguing. white people are most likely to marry another white person
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/06/12/interracial-marriage-who-is-marrying-out/

>>23583218
>They lived in climates in colder than, at or least as cold as Europe.

It's not about temperature, it's about light exposure.

http://www.livescience.com/20910-vitamind-black-americans-cancer-disparity.html

>I never did that.

"Melanin is more masculine" is what you claimed.

>Do you think Brad Pitt loses sleep over black men?

I think he'd be a bit perturbed if he found several folders worth of black cocks on Angelina's laptop tbqh.

I'm amazed you think even a good looking white guy wouldn't be put off by the fact the girl he loves "prefers black men", unless he had a sexual fetish or something similar.

>We know that it's, at minimum, about 65-70% with a skew beyond that.

No we don't. For not a single one of your claims have you provided corroborative evidence of any kind. This is about the 8th time you've tried to string together a bunch of uncorroborated assumptions.

>>23583150
>I wouldn't date a woman who has a thing for black men. It's kind of a red flag.

It's not a red flag. That's how you rationalize it because it makes you feel insecure about yourself. Please don't use this kind of sour grapes logic.

> It means she literally seeks out people who are more likely to abuse her. It's a sign of poor self-preservation.

I don't know about that. Pretty sure white men have edged out others in the game of abuse. They turned rape and genocide of others into a global export. They raped entire continents. I'm not here to debate on that, but the typical black American has something like 18% European blood due to all of the slave rape that went on.

So if your logic is based on the biggest abuser it works against you here.

>If it's a fetish I don't want anything to do with it.

The idea that anyone who does not unequivocally prefer the majority just has a "fetish" is a silly one.

>Inuits vitamin D intake wasn’t dependent upon the sun.

Then neither should the Europeans have been, and regardless of diet this proves that climate alone does not trigger a lack of melanin.

>>23583271
>They raped entire continents.

As did the various Islamic Caliphates.

Why should some Balkanlar feel guilt about being white when he was subjected to 400 years of subjugation at the hands of a non-European people?

>climate alone does not trigger a lack of melanin.

What are you suggesting does?

>>23583246
>also I'm not really sure what you're arguing. white people are most likely to marry another white person

I'm not arguing against that. People are more likely to do in-group stuff due to environment and social cues. I'm just saying it's not related to objective attraction.

>>23583262
>It's not about temperature, it's about light exposure.

No it's not. Black people actually aren't vitamin D deficient.

http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/11/20/246393329/how-a-vitamin-d-test-misdiagnosed-african-americans

>"Melanin is more masculine" is what you claimed.

It's true, but I didn't claim it. I responded with it to someone trying to berate me.

>I think he'd be a bit perturbed if he found several folders worth of black cocks on Angelina's laptop tbqh.

They adopted a black girl. I doubt he would give a fuck. Attractive men do not get jealous. Brad Pitt does not lose sleep wondering how big Denzel Washington's penis is.

>No we don't.

Yes we do. US demographics provide the baseline, with a slight skew in the favor of whiteness considering white people are much more likely to have internet access.

You seem to be in denial after realizing that skewed internet site inbox data is not the same as real-life physical attraction.

>>23583271
domestic abuse is not the same thing as genocide. we're talking about living together in the same house and the safety you can expect in such an arrangement. I'm just saying that it's a red flag if you're actively seeking out those relationships
>The idea that anyone who does not unequivocally prefer the majority just has a "fetish" is a silly one.
white people are literally not the majority. there are plenty of black people in africa. if she's actively looking for black men and the 'degradation' that comes with that I don't want any part of it. the same thing with asian girls. if it's nothing but the man wanting to dominate a meek little asian with his superior white cock it's not a healthy relationship.
>Then neither should the Europeans have been, and regardless of diet this proves that climate alone does not trigger a lack of melanin.
I guess europeans ate less fish and stuff so they got brighter skin for more vitamin d

>>23583301
>As did the various Islamic Caliphates.
Not remotely to the extent that Europeans did.

>Why should some Balkanlar feel guilt about being white
Who said anything about guilt? No one said anything about guilt. I only mentioned it because the other guy tried to imply that black people are more violent. A common racist tactic is to paint black people as unreasonable violent creatures. However a basic look at history Europeans were better at violence and doing more of it. Not only among themselves (WW1 and WW2 were essentially colonialism coming home to roost), but the world at large in the form of exporting the bible and the sword.

>What are you suggesting does?
It could have been a mutation to be honest. Something to do with how albinism works, but just isolated to the skin and not necessarily hair. Regardless it's not a big deal, doesn't matter much in modern society, and it's going too far off-topic.

27/f

>Favorite types of porn?
bukkake, chikan, forced, double/triple penetration, creampies (anal, vaginal, oral)
>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
No, social/moral inhibition has shaped it more so than any other factor, along with risk of disease etc.
>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
I don't know many women so I can't speak for the entire sex. I love porn. If I want to get off I use porn because my imagination doesn't cut it.
>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
Interracial porn is similar to tentacle porn. I don't find black men attractive in the least and their cocks are entirely alien. I've gotten off to it once or twice in the past but overall I don't enjoy it.

I'm not surprised people are shitting themselves over interracial porn and cucking right now.

>>23583314
>domestic abuse is not the same thing as genocide. we're talking about living together in the same house and the safety you can expect in such an arrangement.
Sure, but in objective terms black people are not anymore violent than white people are. Domestic violence is more of a function of being smart about picking your partner. Don't pick some retard or some ghetto person or a sociopath.

>>23583356
>Domestic violence is more of a function of being smart about picking your partner. Don't pick some retard or some ghetto person or a sociopath.
and if you're actively going after black people you're objectively speaking more likely to be abused/killed. I'm not saying anything about the nature of black people, I'm saying that it's a sign of poor self-preservation skills if a girl does that stuff. it's a red flag. a red flag doesn't mean that a woman is necessarily a bad partner

>>23583341
>Not remotely to the extent that Europeans did.

Wew. Pontian Greek genocide, the Bulgarian Horrors, the Armenian Genocide, the Assyrian Genocide. All this from just two centuries of just one of the major Islamic Caliphates.

I could spend days talking about the massacres the Arabs committed in Sicily, Southern Italy, The Near East, the death toll involved in the invasion of the Indian subcontinent (which essentially wiped Buddhism out in Northern India), the mass killings of Zoroastrians in Persia.

And if you want to leave Islam alone entirely, then we can talk about China instead: Dzungar Genocide, Sogdonian Genocide (a literal genocide, as in, every single last man, woman and child wiped out), the various punative invasions of Vietnam/Indochina that killed millions.

>exporting the bible and the sword.

Well, Abrahamic religions in general are pretty shit, but Christianity is preferable to Islam any day.

>It could have been a mutation to be honest.

Do you have any evidence?

>>23583302
>No it's not.

You're trying to contradict established evolutionary biology at this point:

https://www.nasw.org/article/vitamin-d-levels-determined-how-human-skin-color-evolved

>It's true

In what way is it true?

>They adopted a black girl.

Not a good thing. Interracial adoptions are fraught with a higher than average (for adoptive children) rate of dysfunction. And there's a difference between adopting and your wife being into black guys.

>Brad Pitt does not lose sleep wondering how big Denzel Washington's penis is.

Because Angelina probably isn't into black men.

I'm struggling to understand what planet you live on where attractive white guys are ok with their girlfriends telling them that they prefer black men. This is straight up cuckold shit.

>US demographics provide the baseline

No they don't. You don't even know the average age, the range, the racial breakdown of the site. You're simply assuming it mirrors US demographics exactly. 20 minutes ago you claimed it mirrored the entire profile of America, including pensioners.

>You seem to be in denial after realizing that skewed internet site inbox data is not the same as real-life physical attraction.

You're extremely childish.

>I'm not saying anything about the nature of black people, I'm saying that it's a sign of poor self-preservation skills if a girl does that stuff.

No it's not. Less than .01% of black people are involved in violent crimes. "poor self-preservation skills" is a spin you're doing because you feel insecure when white women are interested in others. Domestic violence is more of a function of being smart about picking your partner. Don't pick some retard or some ghetto person or a sociopath.

>if she's actively looking for black men and the 'degradation' that comes with that I don't want any part of it. the same thing with asian girls. if it's nothing but the man wanting to dominate a meek little asian with his superior white cock it's not a healthy relationship.

The point went over your head. Not every interracial relationship is based on a "fetish". It's not a radical idea that two people might date because they find eachother attractive and have things in common.

>>23583386
>Wew.
>Pontian Greek genocide, the Bulgarian Horrors, the Armenian Genocide, the Assyrian Genocide.

Again, not remotely to the extent that Europeans did.

http://www.walkingbutterfly.com/2010/12/22/when-you-kill-ten-million-africans-you-arent-called-hitler/

King Leopold II's activity in the Congo alone outdoes all of these events you mentioned multiplied by 5, and that's not even counting the transatlantic slave-trade (turning slavery into a global enterprise) or the genocide of Americans.

>Well, Abrahamic religions in general are pretty shit, but Christianity is preferable to Islam any day.

All religions come from the same place.

>>23583416
>You're trying to contradict established evolutionary biology at this point:

Modern (as in very recent) science says you're wrong. http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/11/20/246393329/how-a-vitamin-d-test-misdiagnosed-african-americans

>In what way is it true?

Higher levels of melanin is more masculine. Like high ridges or deep set eyes or wide shoulders. It's associated with virility.

Lighter skin isn't bad though unless you cross into pale territory at which point it can be harmful.

>Not a good thing.

What? Adopting anyone is a great thing especially if you're helping out someone from a bad background.

>Because Angelina probably isn't into black men.

There are black men that almost all women would sleep with. 10/10 men of any background have no trouble attracting just about anyone. Brad Pitt does not lose sleep over that, because he's not a loser who lacks internal self-worth and is insecure about his genes.

>I'm struggling to understand what planet you live on where attractive white guys are ok with their girlfriends telling them that they prefer black men.

That's not what I said. I said that no confident mentally normal person will care if their partner also has other likes.

>No they don't.

Yes they do.

>You don't even know the average age, the range, the racial breakdown of the site.

Exceedingly middle-class.

>You're simply assuming it mirrors US demographics exactly

Mirroring US demographics exactly would be the least white scenario, because that wouldn't take into account differing levels of internet access.

>>23583437
>and that's not even counting the transatlantic slave-trade

You realize more slaves were trafficked and died in the Arab Slave Trade in East Africa right? And that's not even counting their enslavement of about 2 million Southern Europeans from the 8th to the 13th centuries.

>King Leopold II's activity in the Congo alone outdoes all of these events you mentioned multiplied by 5

Nonsense. There are figures putting the death toll resulting from the Indian subcontinent in the tens of millions, and the Ming subjugation of the Vietnamese uprising alone, according to Ming and Vietnamese sources, claimed about 4 million lives.

And Muslims weren't involved in the Transatlantic Slave Trade to the same extent they were in East Africa because they couldn't gain access to the wider Med after the defeat of the Ottomans at Lepanto, it had nothing to do with them being more moral.

>>23583481
>says you're wrong

It says a vitamin D test misdiagnosed a particular kind of vitamin D deficiency. It does not change the fact that:

>The dearth of UVB rays in northern climates put positive evolutionary pressure on early migratory humans to ramp up Vitamin D production, Jablonski noted. And indeed, fair-skinned people of European descent are nearly six times more efficient at making Vitamin D from UVB rays than those living near the equator.

>That's not what I said. I said that no confident mentally normal person will care if their partner also has other likes.

Go back and read our discussion from the beginning, it's not about "other likes", it's about hierarchical preferences.

>Exceedingly middle-class.

[Citation Needed]

>because that wouldn't take into account differing levels of internet access.

Firstly, just because races differ in internet access and usage, it does not mean this is going to be reflected across every single US-centric site.

Secondly, the differences are minimal and Asian Americans are the most likely to have internet access:

http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/

>>23583510
>You realize more slaves were trafficked and died in the Arab Slave Trade in East Africa right?
Wrong.

>Nonsense.
Not nonsense. King Leopold II's activity in the Congo alone outdoes all of these events you mentioned multiplied by 5, and that's not even counting the transatlantic slave-trade (turning slavery into a global enterprise) or the genocide of Americans.

>>23583510
>It does not change the fact that:

It changes a lot. Namely that Europeans evolved without melanin because of vitamin D. Africans have melanin and no vitamin D issues.

>it's about hierarchical preferences.
This is a topic that clearly makes you upset, so I don't blame you, but you seem to be understanding preferences wrong. If someone has a first preference it doesn't mean that the other ones are disliked.

Even to someone who prefers asian men or black men, a 10/10 white man will be more attractive than 90% of them. The same thing applies in reverse. When someone says they prefer black men it doesn't mean they don't like white (or insert other type) men or don't date them.

>Firstly, just because races differ in internet access and usage, it does not mean this is going to be reflected across every single US-centric site.
On average it will. Especially popular ones.

>Secondly, the differences are minimal and Asian Americans are the most likely to have internet access
Asian-Americans are a tiny amount of non-whites. As you can see both blacks and Hispanics are less likely to have it.

>>23583437
now assume that it's mostly men you have to worry about. also consider that it's men in the ages between 20-40 you have to worry about. what is it, one of thousand black men will have been involved in violence with deadly outcome? play stupid games, win stupid prizes. it'll continue to be a red flag as long as the statistics look as they do. I don't care about white women lusting over successful black people or whatever, that's normal behavior

>"poor self-preservation skills" is a spin you're doing because you feel insecure when white women are interested in others.
well yea, in a way. culture is partly a fight for sexual capital. it's why white people are least likely to marry/date other than whites, they're the most desirable. it's white people who are starring in and making those big hollywood movies. it's why white people are massively overrated in asian countries. sexual capital. it's also why asian males are massively underrated in white countries. our culture thrives on devaluing asian masculinity. everything comes with a hierarchy, even sexual desire

>>23583562
>Wrong

The Transatlantic Slave Trade moved anywhere between 7 to 15 million people. The Arab Slave Trade moved anywhere between 10 to 20 million people. 2 million Europeans alone were enslaved in the Ummayyad period.
>King Leopold killed 100,000,000 Congolese
>Even though this is 90% of the population of Africa in 1850

lol ok.

>Namely that Europeans evolved without melanin because of vitamin D.

>Africans have melanin and no vitamin D issues.

That's one study. There are a dozen others across multiple countries showing vitamin D deficiencies among immigrant sub-saharan populations in lower than average light areas.

>If someone has a first preference it doesn't mean that the other ones are disliked.

If you like one thing more than another, you dis privilege that other thing by default. The concept of a hierarchy is that the hierarchy itself is zero sum.

>On average it will. Especially popular ones.

This is up to you to prove.

>Asian-Americans are a tiny amount of non-whites.

And the difference between the largest "non white" group, Hispanics, was that of a single percentage point.

Asian Americans are 5.6% of the population, nearly half of what AAs are, so it's hardly statistically insignificant, especially when you consider their numbers are nearly double this between the 16-25 range.

>and that's not even counting the transatlantic slave-trade

Slavery was already a global enterprise long before that. East Africans were traded as far afield as Indonesia and East Slavs were traded as far South as the Arabian Gulf.

>>23583603
Most Asian women prefer Asian men.

In-group preference is a uniform thing across all female groups.

>>23583603
>our culture thrives on devaluing asian masculinity. everything comes with a hierarchy, even sexual desire

Exactly. This is why being interested in black men is not an actual "red flag", but rather the sour grapes of a white guy who feels insecure that a woman dares to be interested in someone other than him.

Dating white guys is a red flag if they're anything like you. Don't be such a condescending child. You can't just label all black people a "red flag" after white people just got stacking more bodies and raping more people in the last few hundred years than black people have in the last 1000. This attitude where you think you're better than everyone is literally offputting to everyone who is not you.

>>23583640
sure but there are still significant statistical differences that says a lot about the sexual capital of different groups. the marketplace isn't even

>>23583612
>The Transatlantic Slave Trade moved anywhere between 7 to 15 million people. The Arab Slave Trade moved anywhere between 10 to 20 million people.
Wrong.

>King Leopold killed 100,000,000 Congolese

Also wrong. 11 million is not 100,000,000.

>That's one study. There are a dozen others across multiple countries showing vitamin D deficiencies among immigrant sub-saharan populations in lower than average light areas.

Those studies replicate the same dated information. This study is a newer scientific breakthrough based on modern technology.

>If you like one thing more than another, you dis privilege that other thing by default. The concept of a hierarchy is that the hierarchy itself is zero sum.

It's not zero sum. Again, just because someone likes black men the most doesn't mean they can't also like other men. Do you have some kind of god complex? Individual attractiveness generally trumps overall preferences.

>And the difference between the largest "non white" group, Hispanics, was that of a single percentage point.

When you average non-whites together, and then adjust for population, the level of internet access is lower.

>Slavery was already a global enterprise long before that.

This is wrong. The transatlantic slave trade was on a much greater scale than anything anyone else ever did in the history of slavery. Countries were destroyed and millions died. Also it's worth noting that most other "slavery" was actually more like indentured servitude, which the translatlantic slave trade was not.

>>23583646
>Exactly. This is why being interested in black men is not an actual "red flag", but rather the sour grapes of a white guy who feels insecure that a woman dares to be interested in someone other than him.
it still kind of is. it's a red flag if a women does drugs. it's a red flag if she can't hold a job. it's a red flag if she only goes after black men. white women aren't going after asian men. if everything was equal this wouldn't be the case. there's still the red flag of fetishizing. it's the reason older white women goes on sex trips to kenya rather than bangkok. I don't need that in my life

>You can't just label all black people a "red flag" after white people just got stacking more bodies and raping more people in the last few hundred years than black people have in the last 1000. This attitude where you think you're better than everyone is literally offputting to everyone who is not you.
so don't date white men. it's your choice. I never said that I'm better than everyone

>>23583692
>it still kind of is. it's a red flag if a women does drugs. it's a red flag if she can't hold a job. it's a red flag if she only goes after black men.

It's not a red flag. Those things do not equate.

>there's still the red flag of fetishizing.

Again, stop equating interracial dating with fetishizing. Not every interracial relationship is based on a "fetish". It's not a radical idea that two people might date because they like eachother and have things in common.

>white women aren't going after asian men.

Some are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcOhIbB44CY

>so don't date white men. it's your choice. I never said that I'm better than everyone

You didn't say it, but you think it. It seems like your self worth is built on being white and how whites are better than everyone else, particularly blacks. But it is a huge lie, a lie that can only be maintained by not looking at your past while unfairly generalizing others.

>>23583671
>wrong
>transatlantic slave trade was on a much greater scale

Also wrong.

From: Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean; the Barbary Coast and Italy 1500 - 1800, by Robert Davis.

In a two century period alone, some 1 1/4 million Europeans were enslaved by Arab corsairs.

From: Islam's Black Slaves, Ronald Segal

>However, at least 28 million Africans were enslaved in the Muslim Middle East. As at least 80% of those captured by Muslim slave traders were calculated to have died before reaching the slave markets, it is believed that the death toll from the 14 centuries of Muslim slave raids into Africa could have been over 112 million. When added to the number of those sold in the slave markets, the total number of African victims of the Trans Saharan and East African slave trade could be significantly higher than 140 million people.

>11 million

A huge exaggeration, but still less than were killed in the Islamic invasion of the Indian subcontinent.

>It's not zero sum.

If I prefer one thing to another, then all other aspects being equal I will pick that one thing.

>Those studies replicate the same dated information.

No they don't. And the study you linked does not "disprove" Vitamin D deficiency. It acknowledges total Vitamin D levels are lower due to genetic differences but states that blacks do not suffer from calcium-related issues because this Vitamin D is more readily available as a binding protein.

Bone issues are just one factor of vitamin D deficiency, there are at least a dozen others all of which blacks have, moreover, there are other physiological explanations without regards to Vitamin D at all that could explain good black bone quality.

>>23576720
>I agree white women say some pretty shitty things about white men sometimes
never heard a white woman say anything bad about white guys specifically

Any examples?

>>23583722
>Not every interracial relationship is based on a "fetish".
whenever I see a mixed (white-asian) kid I already know the father is white. basically the same thing with white-black kids. it's not about being prejudiced, it's about using your noggin. if the relationship is built on fetishizing it's an unhealthy one

https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/biracial-asian-americans-and-mental-health?id=8732

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/

>Some are. https://wwwyoutube.com/watch?v=fcOhIbB44CY [Embed]
wow lol
I'm sure asian guys love hearing from white women how their masculinity isn't ridiculed in white society and if they're really optimistic they'll be just as successful as any other guy

>It seems like your self worth is built on being white and how whites are better than everyone else, particularly blacks.
yea not really

>>23583692
I'd advise you to stop while you're ahead. I initially thought it could be reasoned with but you're dealing with someone who has pretty severe daddy issues. It wouldn't surprise me if it was covered in tattoos and a history of sexually risky behavior.

Just remember: The three marital pairings in the US with the highest divorce rates all involve non-white men with white women, the highest rates of spousal homicide and the highest rates of domestic violence too. These people are digging their own graves.

>>23583760
The mental health thing is true for all interracial kids, incidentally. The National Longditudinal Survey of Adolescent Health shows this. All biracial children have increased risk of mental health issues and also physical health issues as compared to their same-race counterparts.

Makes me sad desu.

Maybe somebody knows, is there a porn type where female just wants the penis, not the man, lol, like, she is almost hunting the dick but dont even paying attention to the guy
Sorry for bad english. Thanks.

>>23583764
I'm not even being overly /pol/ about this. I'm saying that it's red flag because they're literally putting themselves at a disadvantageous position, statistically speaking.
it turns out it was a swell black guy and she's totally not into fucking other people because she gets turned on by some iffy racial stuff? great! I'll marry her and have eight kids

>>23583808
From reading your posts you sound like an Asian guy.

Asian women's no. 1 choice, on average, is Asian men. I don't know where you guys get the low self-esteem from. Obviously if you're gunning for white girls it's going to be more difficult though. But it works in reverse, white guys aren't going to have as easy a time with top tier Asian girls as Asian guys do.

>>23583805
at least we got keanu reeves and brandon lee out of this whole ordeal. and they both had asian dads... hmmm
I'm always suspicious of fethisizing when it's the "typical" coupling of wm/aw or bm/aw. nothing good can ever come from that shit.

>>23583833
I disagree with that, Jenni Hashimoto and Sasha Yung show it can work both ways.

And white women are probably the most fetishized women on earth.

>>23583744
From: Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean; the Barbary Coast and Italy 1500 - 1800, by Robert Davis.

>In a two century period alone, some 1 1/4 million Europeans were enslaved by Arab corsairs.

We both know this is bullshit, or the middle-east would be full of white people.

>A huge exaggeration

Not a huge exaggeration at all.

>If I prefer one thing to another, then all other aspects being equal I will pick that one thing.

Yes all things being equal, but that doesn't stop you from being better. Do you have to always be the absolute first choice? You reek of insecurity.

>No they don't. And the study you linked does not "disprove" Vitamin D deficiency.

It doesn't disprove the deficiency, but it disproves the idea that a lack of melanin evolved because of it.

>>23583833
Also that prompted me to read a little about Keanu's background, never knew his father was Hawaiian, but he doesn't sound like he was a great guy:

>Reeves's mother was working in Beirut when she met his father. Reeves's father earned his GED while imprisoned in Hawaii for selling heroin at Hilo International Airport.[14] He abandoned his wife and family when Reeves was three years old, but Reeves knew him until he was six.

>>23583842
>We both know this is bullshit, or the middle-east would be full of white people.

Uh no, that's the author drawing upon reports of coastal raids by barbary corsairs over the period. So primary source documents. Secondly, it doesn't mean the "middle east would have been white", but there's certainly Europid admixture there, especially in North Africa. We're talking about 2 million people over the course of a few centuries, into a landmass that probably supported 40,000,000+

>Not a huge exaggeration at all.

Yes it is. The population of the Belgian Congo could never have exceeded 10,000,000 before the 20th century, it was only 16,000,000 in 1960.

>Yes all things being equal, but that doesn't stop you from being better. Do you have to always be the absolute first choice? You reek of insecurity.

Repeating that word over and over again won't make it any more true. There's a difference between saying "I find some black men attractive" and "I find black men the most attractive on average". The latter would make most men run for the hills.

File: enhanced-23272-1445255245-1.png (697KB, 625x391px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 625x391px

>>23583760
>whenever I see a mixed (white-asian) kid I already know the father is white.

No you don't.

>basically the same thing with white-black kids.

No you don't. Most mixed white-black kids have black fathers.

>if the relationship is built on fetishizing it's an unhealthy one

You seem to be really thick on this. Stop equating interracial dating with fetishizing. Not every interracial relationship is based on a "fetish". It's not a radical idea that two people might date because they like eachother and have things in common.

>wow lol
>I'm sure asian guys love hearing from white women how their masculinity isn't ridiculed in white society and if they're really optimistic they'll be just as successful as any other guy

I don't know why you're going "wow lol". AMWF couples aren't some kind of alien concept even if they're not most popular. Look at Rachel and Jun.

>yea not really

Then why do you insist on trying to belittle black people?

>>23583867
>No you don't. Most mixed white-black kids have black fathers.

That was his point. Both relationships are heavily skewed towards a white father or a black father, because there's an implicit fetish involved. It seems to have gone over your head.

>>23583825
no, I just sympathize with them. partly because I also have relatively low sexual capital (I'm on fuckin 4chan) and partly because I've always admired their art and movies. I have little game but as an asian I would've stood no chance. I've been on vacation to thailand and the whole thing put this whole thing in a new perspective for me. it's like that stupid comic with a scrawny guy landing in an asian country and suddenly becoming super man

>>23583837
not only talking about looks. a hapa can look nice but still be crazy. the mental illness part is the one that's bothering me
>And white women are probably the most fetishized women on earth.
for sure but when I'm talking about white women/asian males you can at least be sure that the woman isn't looking for someone who dehumanizes her with his "unpure" skin. she's probably more mentally sound. you can never be sure of the man's intentions.

>>23583842
Why do you care so much if white men find white women like you off putting? If you prefer black men that's fine. Seriously. But why do you care what white men think of it if your preference is for the BBC? You should care about what the men you prefer are into, not us. We can both go our separate ways.

>>23583764
>I initially thought it could be reasoned with but you're dealing with someone who has pretty severe daddy issues.
Says the loser who is so sexually insecure toward other men that he literally breaks down over the thought of women into someone other than him? Who's the one with issues?

You're the definition of pathetic. Get over yourself.

>The National Longditudinal Survey of Adolescent Health shows this. All biracial children have increased risk of mental health issues and also physical health issues as compared to their same-race counterparts.
[citation needed]

And even if that were true it would be related to environmental factors and bullying. Not the fact that they're mixed. Mixed race people, however, are generally rated as more attractive:

http://www.odt.co.nz/campus/university-otago/287946/mixed-race-faces-appeal-more-study
http://nypost.com/2014/08/18/mixed-race-singles-do-better-than-others-in-online-dating/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/8618606.stm

>It wouldn't surprise me if it was covered in tattoos and a history of sexually risky behavior.
Zero tattoos, and I've only had had two partners (who were boyfriends). Oh, and I'm 5'8 120 pounds. Nice try, neckbeard. You can go fuck yourself.

>>23583908
From one of your links :

>Dr Lewis said: "There is evidence, albeit anecdotal, that the impact of heterosis goes beyond just attractiveness.
>"This comes from the observation that, although mixed-race people make up a small proportion of the population, they are over-represented at the top level of a number of meritocratic professions like acting with Halle Berry, Formula 1 racing with Lewis Hamilton - and, of course, politics with Barack Obama."

LOL. How the hell did this guy become a lecturer?

>>23583866
>I'm saying that it's red flag because they're literally putting themselves at a disadvantageous position, statistically speaking.
It's not a red flag no matter how much you repeat it.

>Uh no, that's the author drawing upon reports of coastal raids by barbary corsairs over the period.
No, it's definitely bullshit. It's also employing what I like to call the "arab trader argument". The Arab trader argument is my name for an argument white Americans often use to defend the evil they do in the world. It goes like this: if white Americans do something evil and terrible it is all right – or at least not all that bad – so long as they can find at least one example from world history of someone else doing the same thing. Thus the Atlantic slave trade was not so bad because Arabs traders sold slaves too! See how it works? Pretty cool trick.

The difference here is that Arabs are not relevant to this discussion. European violence was only brought up because another poster tried to suggest that blacks are uniquely violent.

>Secondly, it doesn't mean the "middle east would have been white"
It does. Look at the US African-American population.

>The population of the Belgian Congo could never have exceeded 10,000,000
You said 100,000,000. I know you're angry about losing the argument, but try to keep your argument consistent.

>here's a difference between saying "I find some black men attractive" and "I find black men the most attractive on average". The latter would make most men run for the hills.
Run from the hills from what? From the fact that someone doesn't like you? You're employing a defense mechanism because it deeply hurts you that you're not always number 1. Grow up and quit being such an insecure child about it.

>>23583764
>I'd advise you to stop while you're ahead.
He was never ahead.
>>23583878
It has nothing to do with fetishization. That obvious point seems to have gone over your head.

>>23583935
I love this autistic chick. She has been arguing for hours with the other autists ITT. There's something really cute about the concept of them just bashing away on their keyboards for hours together. Not even being ironic or shitposting.

>>23583867
>No you don't.
wow you're right, I'm not psychic. it appears I can only assume stuff based on lived experience and statistical data. it's what makes the world go around and it's why some people end up in shitty relationships. like most white women who end up separating from their black men

>Then why do you insist on trying to belittle black people?
I'm saying that it's a red flag for me, concerning the woman. just like a white man with an asian woman is a red flag for me.

>No you don't. Most mixed white-black kids have black fathers.
what the other guy said

>Stop equating interracial dating with fetishizing.
I'll believe you once I've seen you being together with the same guy for at least four years. until then I'll stick with my lived experience. go ahead and prove me wrong, I wont be upset if you have a great life with this guy

>I don't know why you're going "wow lol".
because it's always funny with oblivious white women pretending that the world is a really neat place and there are no ulterior motives behind our actions

>Then why do you insist on trying to belittle black people?
I literally said I don't care for white women who actively go after black men. how am I belittling black people?

File: sourgrapes.png (274KB, 406x405px) Image search: [Google]

274KB, 406x405px

>>23583904
>>23583957
I could care less what they actually think. I find sexually insecure losers offputting.

The only people who whine about this kind of thing are generally very ugly, or very racist. Usually some sort of neckbeardy combination of both.

>find white women like you off putting?
It doesn't find me offputting. It only finds the caricature it invented in it's head to cope with the butthurt offputting. For example it said "probably tattoos and a history of sexually risky behavior". In reality that's nothing like me.

I'm a thin redhead with no tattoos who has had two partners.

>>23573081
I'm curious about this too. Most girls seem pretty submissive so it wouldn't surprise me

>>23583980
LOL. You have been arguing for hours. You clearly care.

And it has obviously gotten to you. Take it easy. Geez. Don't take this shit so seriously.

Most white men don't care and wish you the best. We just don't consider white women who date black men regularly to be relationship material. Apart from that I hope you find happiness.

>thin red-head

Although we'll need pics for this one.

>>23583935
>another poster tried to suggest that blacks are uniquely violent.
in the context of close relationships between people living in the same house. I never talked about who's objectively speaking the most evil race, you brought that up
>you're not always number 1. Grow up and quit being such an insecure child about it.
aw jeez and here I thought I was both faster than usain bolt and stronger than muhammad ali

>>23584001
>LOL. You have been arguing for hours. You clearly care.
You're equating two different things. No, I don't care about sour grapes and delusion in the form of "i dun like u" from some bitter loser who happens to feel jealous. What I do care about though is not letting it think it won the argument.

>>23584005
>in the context of close relationships between people living in the same house. I never talked about who's objectively speaking the most evil race, you brought that up
You tried to imply that violence is some kind of black thing. What universe do you live in?

>>23584027
>You tried to imply that violence is some kind of black thing. What universe do you live in?
uh no. I talked about the assumptions you can make based on the interpersonal relationships of a woman. if she willingly seeks out partners who are more likely to abuse/leave her then she's more likely to be an unfitting partner. 'more likely' is the key here

>>23583962
>it appears I can only assume stuff based on lived experience and statistical data. it's what makes the world go around and it's why some people end up in shitty relationships.
Statistics say that less than 0.1% of black people are involved in violent crimes. Domestic violence is more of a function of being smart about picking your partner. Don't pick some retard or some ghetto person or a sociopath.

>I'm saying that it's a red flag for me, concerning the woman. just like a white man with an asian woman is a red flag for me.
This shouldn't be a red flag to you. The fact that it is says more about you, and your own internal insecurities, than it says about them.

>how am I belittling black people?
You tried to call them a red flag as if that isn't some kind of generalization. That's like saying children should avoid white men because they might get molested.

>>23584042
>'more likely' is the key here
It's still statistically nothing. It's more of a function of YOU, and how smartly you pick your partners, than race.

File: tip.png (328KB, 470x720px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 470x720px

>insecure white men gang up on girl who has tastes that make them feel insecure
>meanwhile they all regularly fap to hentai and have porn folders of non-white women

It's still going!

I used to have a thing for NTR, but these days I'm happy with vanilla and my impregnation fetish/instinct.

>>23583764
>>23583908
Kek. I like that this guy stopped responding when she pointed out that she was a thin redhead. Btfo.

>Yes it is. The population of the Belgian Congo could never have exceeded 10,000,000 before the 20th century, it was only 16,000,000 in 1960.

You mean population goes down when you genocide people? No way!

>>23584051
okay. I'll start dating the kind of women who goes after black men to appease you. the only girl I knew in school who did that stuff got pregnant at 14 and became a single mother but maybe she's available now. wish me luck!

>The fact that it is says more about you
lol it's only part of my internal list. I don't tell women about it, I already know how sensitive they are about anything that could be perceived as racist

>That's like saying children should avoid white men because they might get molested.
no, actually they should also stay clear of black men
http://www.statista.com/statistics/254857/child-abuse-rate-in-the-us-by-race-ethnicity/

>It's still statistically nothing.
with people like you in office I can see that all race related issues will be solved in no time. with this kind of tolerance I'm sure the black folks will stop being massively overrepresented in prison. they just needed an untattooed white loving woman (with no intent to fetishize them) to show them the way

Is tubblr done being shrill?

>>23584092
>pointed out that she was a thin redhead
Someone saying something on the internet doesn't make it fact.

If it does then I'd like to be Taylor Swift!

>>23584105
>I'll start dating the kind of women who goes after black men to appease you.
There is no specific "kind".
>the only girl I knew in school who did that stuff got pregnant at 14 and became a single mother but maybe she's available now
Most white girls who have children early have white fathers.

>lol it's only part of my internal list. I don't tell women about it,
Well obviously. The kind of low value 4chan loser who would be insecure about a white/asian couple (or any interracial couple for that matter) is not exactly the kind of person to speak up in real-life.

>no, actually they should also stay clear of black men
Nope. I said child molestation.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7892399

>with this kind of tolerance I'm sure the black folks will stop being massively overrepresented in prison.
What does any of this have to do with that? The way to address that is to address a biased justice system and the "war on drugs".

http://www.vox.com/2014/7/1/5850830/war-on-drugs-racist-minorities

>they just needed an untattooed white loving woman (with no intent to fetishize them) to show them the way
Are you literally retarded? Serious question.

>>23584135
It's really clear you don't have many friends irl who listen to you. I can't imagine a person this starved for attention is any better than a 4chan neckbeard.

>>23584121
Nah. If she's who I think she is I think I've seen her in rate me and music taste threads, so she's not lying. Yall just mad because you couldn't paint her with your stereotype.

>>23584158
>repeatedly replies to person trying to get their attention
>says they're the ones starved for attention

>>23584135
>There is no specific "kind".
right. my lived experience says it's mostly trashy white women with tattoos but in your tumblr world everyone gets with everyone and asian men are totally bishie and stuff
>Most white girls who have children early have white fathers.
don't know what statistics you're going by, I mostly hear about iranians marrying nine year olds
>Nope. I said child molestation.
the only thing I can find is this
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3fd_1369091684 which references a study which is locked away
>The way to address that is to address a biased justice system and the "war on drugs".
if you say so :)
>Are you literally retarded? Serious question.
wow there's no need to be all hostile and stuff. take it easy, calm down

>>23584194
I've made two replies in this thread, each time to a different poster.

>>23584212
>my lived experience
Means nothing.
>it's mostly trashy white women with tattoos
Not a tattoo on my body, and don't smoke or drink. Looks like I'm a living counter example.
>but in your tumblr world everyone gets with everyone and asian men are totally bishie and stuff
In your 4chan world you have a nervous breakdown and shit your diaper whenever you see an interracial couple in public. And then you think about saying something but get scared and instead save your rant until you get home and can shitpost about it from the solitude of your room.
>the only thing I can find is this
>liveleak
That's literally worse than citing Youtube. Also doesn't refute my citation.

>>23584288
>Means nothing.
>Not a tattoo on my body, and don't smoke or drink. Looks like I'm a living counter example.
it doesn't seem you're very consistent about that lived experience stuff, also your rebuttal to the idea that women don't date asians was a cutesy youtube video
>shit your diaper
just call me a shitbaby. we already know you got those scathing tumblr insults on lockdown
>interracial couple in public.
uh I mostly see white men with asian women. I don't say anything, I kind of smile inwardly
>That's literally worse than citing Youtube.
it was the source in the text that was important but sure
http://www.yellodyno.com/Statistics/statistics_child_molester.html
according to this whites are underrepresented
also your citation is hardly statistically significant

feel free to write angrily at me some more. I'll get back to you after I've had some good sleep. I'm sure you'll eventually be able to convince me that most white women who exclusively goes after black men are just as well-adjusted as the rest of us

File: Jessica_Chastain_by_Gage_Skidmore.jpg (4MB, 1830x2615px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1830x2615px

>>23584329
>>23584344
>it doesn't seem you're very consistent about that lived experience stuff
Yes it does. You made a generalization based on your "lived experience". I just claimed that I'm an obvious counter-example.
>just call me a shitbaby. we already know you got those scathing tumblr insults on lockdown
I'm not from tumblr. I'm from 4chan. You're running out of ammunition, necky.
>uh I mostly see white men with asian women. I don't say anything, I kind of smile inwardly
And then have a nervous breakdown and shit your diaper. When you see one tomorrow make sure to come back to this thread and give us another shitpost rant about how much it hurt you.
>according to this whites are underrepresented
Nope. Overrepresented: "while nearly 70% of those serving time for violent crimes against children were white".
>I'm sure you'll eventually be able to convince me that most white women who exclusively goes after black men are just as well-adjusted as the rest of us
I don't go after them exclusively. I'm sure you'll eventually be able to convince me that an autistic neckbeard who is jealous of the internet girl liking someone other than him is just as well-adjusted as the rest of us. Try not to cry yourself to sleep. :)

Guy here. 29.

>Favorite types of porn?
I don't really watch porn anymore these days because I view women as a whole with more pride than that. Why support something like that? When I did, my thing was just looking at pear-shaped girls. Pears make the world go around, but for a real partner, I'd choose somebody with a good mind.

>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
Yes! I realized that most women aren't actually like that, and the ones who are have had far more boyfriends than me.

>Do you think it's generally uncommon for women to watch lots of porn?
Some women might watch porn, but the cool ones are the ones out there caring about different things than sex.

>Are women actually into interracial porn, or is it just one big trolling exercise?
I don't know.

>>23584624
All about the hourglass.

>>23584624
All about the hourglass.

>>23583987
I've noticed that my wife loves it when I treat her like she is an object, rather than "making love". I think they all have a rape fantasy, but only if they know it's not real rape per se

>>23584388
>You made a generalization based on your "lived experience".
yes, I'm very quick to judge people based on how they speak, who they hang out with and what clothes they wear. not as a way to see if they're 'bad' or 'good' but to see what kind of actions and behaviors I can expect for them. accurately predicting the behaviors of other people makes life much easier
>I'm not from tumblr. I'm from 4chan.
take it easy pissbaby, I already know you're here
>And then have a nervous breakdown and shit your diaper.
right. if you seriously consider white men who exclusively goes after asian women to be just like any other guy then you are an exemplary poor judge of character
>Nope. Overrepresented: "while nearly 70% of those serving time for violent crimes against children were white".
now consider the size of the white population from the time when the numbers where gathered. cmon baby, I believe in you, it's just one more step
also consider the rape capitals of the world. if I recall correctly 50% of all children in south africa under the age of 18 will be raped
>I don't go after them exclusively.
good, then that's less of a red flag
>autistic neckbeard who is jealous of the internet girl liking someone other than him
I literally don't care. most of the interracial couples I see in my day to day life is in a university setting and most people here are eligible partners in the sense that they're driven, committed and educated. outside of the university setting it's completely different matter. I've been trying to explain the concept of red flags for you the entire time but you refuse to get it.
>Try not to cry yourself to sleep. :)
I slept well thank you :)

File: 1baaQNl.jpg (49KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x338px

>>23585604
I wont date a white girl who has been with a black guy.

Call it insecurity or whatever, fact is I find it gross.

In no way am I like a black guy and a girl who is looking for that surely wont find it with me.

I stopped talking to white girls though for like 2 years+ just because I see too many going interracial and its really off putting.

At least asian girls like fit upper middle class white males pursing a good degree.

>>23585604
>yes, I'm very quick to judge people based on how they speak, who they hang out with and what clothes they wear. not as a way to see if they're 'bad' or 'good' but to see
Your logical fallacy is applying this generalization to other people.
>take it easy pissbaby, I already know you're here
Just responding to your stupid comment.
>right. if you seriously consider white men who exclusively goes after asian women to be just like any other guy then you are an exemplary poor judge of character
If you're judging someone's character based on who they're physically attracted to then you are an exemplary poor judge of character. We've already seen a few of you have tried that with me, and it failed delightfully.
>now consider the size of the white population from the time when the numbers where gathered.
The number is about the same today.
>cmon baby, I believe in you, it's just one more step
Talking down to someone when you're functionally retarded doesn't work.
>if I recall correctly 50% of all children in south africa under the age of 18 will be raped
[citation needed]
>good, then that's less of a red flag
You're starting to become aware of your bullshit. Unfortunately you're still a massive red flag (low sexual value loser who attempts to mask insecurity through a facade of being judgemental) to anyone. You even admitted that you're a loser here >>23583882

>I literally don't care. most of the interracial couples I see in my day to day life is in a university setting and most people here are eligible partners in the sense that they're driven, committed and educated.
Yes you do. Or you would not be here bawwing your eyes out like a wounded puppy.

>>23585928
Women of all races are not interested in insecure guys, so that works out.

Also that image is completely out of context.

>>23586585
>Your logical fallacy is applying this generalization to other people.
it's not about fallacies, it's about predicting behaviors and actions based on their previous actions.
>If you're judging someone's character based on who they're physically attracted to then you are an exemplary poor judge of character.
no I'm pretty sure that's a good method as anything for judging. if a white woman goes to kenya to hit it up with black men she's uninteresting to me. if a white man goes to thailand to hit it up with thai women he's most likely an ass
>The number is about the same today.
no, it was about 80%. according to those statistics white people are underrepresented
>[citation needed]
http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/26/the-end-of-innocence-in-south-africa-children-raping-children/
>Unfortunately you're still a massive red flag
ohh noo I'm being judged by someone. how will I cope. maybe I'll try like to pretend you're delusional and isn't entitled to not be attracted to me
>You even admitted that you're a loser
that stuff is relative. I've had sex with different women and I'm in a relationship now. I'm just saying that I've never been a "player", not that I really have an interest in being that
>Or you would not be here bawwing your eyes out like a wounded puppy.
I think you're projecting an awful lot :(

>>23586585
>She's still going

You have to feel pity at this point. Doesn't she have an ugly brown baby to be taking care of?

>>23586585
Anon, I appreciate you sticking up for minorities, it really means a lot, however, doing it here is practically a fools errand.

>>23577520
that feel when I never match with older women on tinder, and I get lots of matches
:(

>>23586662
>it's not about fallacies, it's about predicting behaviors and actions based on their previous actions.
It's about fallacies when you're committing one. Your logical fallacy is applying this generalization to other people.
>no I'm pretty sure that's a good method as anything for judging. if a white woman goes to kenya to hit it up with black men she's uninteresting to me. if a white man goes to thailand to hit it up with thai women he's most likely an ass
False equivalency. You should get a degree in fallacies. I said if you're judging someone's character based on who they're physically attracted to then you are an exemplary poor judge of character. I never said anything about sex tourism.
>no, it was about 80%. according to those statistics white people are underrepresented
No they're not. The number is about the same today.
>ohh noo I'm being judged by someone. how will I cope.
The same way you "cope" when you accidentally see an interracial couple in public: have a nervous breakdown and then shitpost about it on the internet later in the day.
>maybe I'll try like to pretend you're delusional and isn't entitled to not be attracted to me
Your English is slipping. I know you're mad, but try to cool down.
>that stuff is relative. I've had sex with different women and I'm in a relationship now. I'm just saying that I've never been a "player", not that I really have an interest in being that
You're a loser. Don't sugarcoat it. You even admitted it yourself.
>I think you're projecting an awful lot :(
I think you are :(

>>23586674
>crawling back after you got destroyed
You lost the argument here >>23584092

I'm still not done laughing. Bye.

>Doesn't she have an ugly brown baby to be taking care

Mixed race people are generally rated as more attractive. Try again!

http://www.odt.co.nz/campus/university-otago/287946/mixed-race-faces-appeal-more-study
http://nypost.com/2014/08/18/mixed-race-singles-do-better-than-others-in-online-dating/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/8618606.stmof?

>>23586904
>Your logical fallacy is applying this generalization to other people.
how is it a fallacy to assume that something is more likely based on statistics?
> on who they're physically attracted to
physical attraction is never simply physically attraction you simpleton. you can be attracted to people for unsavoury reasons
>No they're not. The number is about the same today.
why are you literally saying stuff that's false? that's kind of dishonest
https://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/intfile3-1.txt
>You're a loser. Don't sugarcoat it. You even admitted it yourself.
I don't care. you're barking up the wrong tree here
>I think you are :(
in what way?

>woman

uh I started masturbating when i was 15 playing WoW so i started with WoW porn got into hentai, and now i watch a lot of hentai related porn like monster porn and stuff rape whatever

also a lot of non hentai usually bdsm stuff, dom sub, or sadist and masochist, so it sorta shaped me.

>>23583908
>zero tattoos

Post a picture of yourself. The rest of us can draw our own conclusions from your appearance.

>>23586625
im not insecure though, thats the thing. But everyone implies because a white guy doesnt want a girl who's been black oh he must be insecure.

>>23587314
Makes you wonder why they care so much right?

As far as I'm concerned it's a good thing. Existential threats to a group mean that those who don't have ethnocentric tendencies and endogamous tendencies are selected against. In other words the end result is that the group becomes more tribal in the long run.

>>23586719
Yeah I commend her too. Anyone trying to stick up for minorities on 4chan is basically throwing time away.
>>23587314
You are insecure. I'm a white man and it's clear that you're both insecure and hypocritical dude.
>>23587346
>existential threat
Let me guess. You have a baby dick?

>>23587477
>Let me guess. You have a baby dick?

Groups compete as individuals do.

I'm sorry you're sheltered enough that you think the world is a giant padded nursery, perhaps the coming dominance of China and the impact this will have on American living standards and structural unemployment will jolt you back to reality.

>>23587477
I simply refuse to date women who dated black men because they are low class most of the time. A large majority of black guys are no good so dating one is a sign of being irresponsible.

>>23573081
I'm a girl and I don't watch porn at all nor do I have rape fetishes. Nowadays it seems more uncommon for a girl to not watch porn or want violent sex than to want it.

File: fuckoff2.jpg (143KB, 542x697px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 542x697px

>>23587664
>Stop projecting.
He's the cuck? You're the one "scared" of black men, kek.

Fuck off back to your containment board and take your buzzwords with you, stormweenie faggot.

File: 1333174973036.jpg (10KB, 300x400px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x400px

>>23587690
>>23587696
And what if someone dates a good black guy? Then youll still be an insecure faggot but youll have no excuse to fall back on.

>A nigger is only above him being represented in the crime statistics lol
http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

Racists should not talk. Youre low on essentially every hierarchy there is lol.

>>23587477
Im not insecure, i just think its gross. Im fit, educated, and my dick is a little over 6.5". So i can assure you Im not insecure about myself.

>>23586719
No need to thank me.
>>23586997
>how is it a fallacy to assume that something is
It's a logical fallacy to blanket apply generalizations to other people. "Everyone who does X must have tattoos" and so on.
>physical attraction is never simply physically attraction you simpleton.
Yes it is, moron. It doesn't imply anything besides the fact that you're attracted to something. Anything else is extraneous. I never said anything about sex tourism or whatever bullshit you jumped to.
>https://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/intfile3-1.txt
That doesn't disprove the point.
>I don't care.
I never said you did.
>in what way?
In what way are you projecting? Take a look at your post history.

>>23588072
>"Everyone who does X must have tattoos" and so on.
I never said this. I used the words 'more likely'. feel free to check any statistics to the stuff I've referenced
>Yes it is, moron. It doesn't imply anything besides the fact that you're attracted to something.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_and_control_in_abusive_relationships
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_fetishism
not all attraction is created equal
>That doesn't disprove the point.
you said white men were more likely to molest children to make some weird point about the evil of white men or whatever. the only significant data I found said they were approx. 70% of the offenders but 80% of the population. they're underrepresented
>In what way are you projecting? Take a look at your post history.
good answer

>>23588072
I have a suspicion I know you irl. CA right?

>>23587548
>Groups compete as individuals do
>perhaps the coming dominance of China...
Not everything is a competition. Secondly you're falsely conflating ethnic origin with "group". America and China have lots of different kinds of people. Lastly the US is far ahead of China and China has already peaked long ago. The fastest growing region in the world haven't been Asia for decades. China is beginning to age.
>>23587664
>right side of history
>scumy degenerates
Is not on the side of some basement nazi with an inferiority complex. I'm literally less scared of you than the crap I took this morning. When they hang your nazi ass try not to cry.

>>23588221
>Secondly you're falsely conflating ethnic origin with "group".

Because it's more meaningful than nationality. Think about how many Chinese Americans who are naturalised are involved in espionage. If nationality is more important than ethnicity they shouldn't be spying in the first place. Blood is thicker than water for most people.

>China has peaked

China adds adds the size of a country like Belgium every year to its economy with 6pc growth.

>lots of different people

Not to the extent America does. 90% of the population are Han and the remaining 10% are mostly East Asian minorities. That's like America being 100% white with different European groups.

>>23588221
>Not everything is a competition.

Lol. We live in a rapidly shrinking world with rapidly increasing competition for diminishing resources. Of course it's a competition you delusional millennial faggot.

>>23588145
>I never said this. I used the words 'more likely'.
Yes. Women aren't "more likely" to have tattoos because you happened to see one.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_and_control_in_abusive_relationships
There's no way you're this stupid. None of those things can be equated to physical attraction. If you're physically attracted to someone it means you like that person. That's it. Stockholm syndrome, sex tourism, and abusive relationships are completely extraneous things (that can apply to anyone) not fundamentally related to attraction itself.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_fetishism
You seem to be really thick on this. Stop equating interracial dating with fetishizing. Not every interracial relationship is based on a "fetish". It's not a radical idea that two people might date because they like eachother and have things in common.
>you said white men were more likely to molest children to make some weird point about the evil of white men or whatever
To point out the logical fallacy of you suggesting that everyone should avoid black people despite less than 0.1% of them being involved in violent crimes.
>but 80% of the population
Whites are not 80% of the population. That only happens when you include Hispanics. Well "white people" is unscientific and ultimately meaningless (as is "black people") which is why this happens, but you're reading the data wrong.
>good answer
I know. Self-reflection is hard for people like you.

>>23588246
>Because it's more meaningful than nationality

No it's not, because nationality determines your culture. Look at Ben Carson.

>Think about how many Chinese Americans who are naturalized

If they naturalized then they were originally Chinese, and not American. Asians who are born here are a lot less likely to spy for a country that they've never seen and has nothing to do with them. It would be like saying George Bush is going to spy for France or something. Also citation needed on "how many". This spy narrative also overlooks the Chinese and Japanese officers who fought and died for our country during WW2 and the Korean War.

There was a US officer during the Korean War who even went to the extent of using his Chinese knowledge to shout false orders on the battlefield to confuse enemy soldiers.

>Blood is thicker than water for most people

We all bleed the same blood. It's your culture that determines what you believe and what you stand for. My brother is a worthless ass, can't get himself together, and has never done anything for me. The only person I could call my bro is my brother not by something as accidental as blood, but something much stronger. Something that has to be proven.

>China adds adds the size of a country like Belgium every year to its economy with 6pc growth

And the US adds more. We have double China's GDP. Also doesn't change the fact that the fastest economically growing region is Africa, not China.

>Not to the extent America does.

I never said it was.

>>23588374
The US does not add more. Not anymore. Chinese growth rates are treble those of American even at the lowest projection.

>>23588251
Diminishing resources? The vast majority of the world's farmable land isn't even being utilized. We're moving toward renewable and sustainable energy at break-neck speeds. The only reason everything is a "competition" to you is because you're internally see yourself as weak and vulnerable. This is why I guessed you have a baby dick. It's written all over you. The only thing infighting does is stall progress.

>>23588374
Not the guy you're replying to :

>because nationality determines your culture

t. Molenbeek

>twice china's gdp

This is factually incorrect.

>>23588402
>infighting

It's amazing you see nothing wrong with projecting your one worldism onto the rest of the world. He's right. The Chinese don't give a fuck about your dreams of global government or whatever other nerd shit you fantasise about.

And arable land is irrelevant here. Primary resources and industry are what's important and China has gutted American industry through mercantile trade policies and their own hard work.

>>23588374
Africa only exists as an economic force in the sense it exports raw materials to China. High growth is immaterial if you are starting from nothing. It's when you actually have industry and manufacturing of note that it becomes relevant.

>>23572559
>Favorite types of porn?
Based on what I saved in the last few months...
Loli, futa, traps, uncut cocks, rule 34, and a lot of just plain naked women.

>Has porn shaped your sexuality in any way?
For sure. I'm way more open now than when I was a teenager jerking off to lesbian-only porn.

File: gdp.png (35KB, 417x287px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 417x287px

>>23588406
>>23588433
>This is factually incorrect.
He's close. Japan is closer to China than China is to us. Anyone crying about China is memeing.
>>23588433
>Africa only exists as an economic force in the sense it exports raw materials to China.
Naw the growth is multifaceted. Lots of places are trying to invest there now because the upcoming market of middleclass consumers is big potential. Also the US is recently taking advantage of trade deals with Africa by trying to establish them too.

>>23588449
Name a single piece of sophisticated capital equipment manufactured in Africa.

girls riding their dildo(s), fucking themselves with their dildo(s) or toy(s) and also giving them blowjobs

I've been browsing shemale way less nowadays since I think I'm finally growing tired of shemale porn

>>23588221
>Is not on the side of some basement nazi with an inferiority complex.
Again with the projections. History will be on the side of those who actually elevate humanity. Racial purity is the only way humanity can survive and even sick cucks like you know it deep down.

Thank fuck people like you wont be around in a few decades.

>>23588417
>with projecting your one worldism onto the rest of the world.

What the fuck is one worldism? And no he's not right. The vast majority of the world's farmable land isn't even being utilized. We're moving toward renewable and sustainable energy at break-neck speeds.

>The Chinese don't give a fuck about..

They also don't give a fuck about starting WW3 like you seem to think. China is a rival but we're both supporting eachother. KFC literally has more locations in China than in the US.

>>23573081
Not true.
I am a female and VERY into interracial. I'm a white latina though.
It's actually my favorite, if the actors arent shit/if it seems real.
As for rape, no. I dont have that fetish.
The idea of being forced to fuck aggressive and unattractive men turns me off entirely.

File: 1411800607803.jpg (148KB, 847x1133px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 847x1133px

Lol can't believe these /pol/tards haven't left yet.
>>23588495
>killing everyone who makes me feel insecure is the only way humanity can survive
>neo-nazi logic
You're not going to get your "revolution" you delusional neo-nazi faggot. You're going to be a dead skinhead in an electric chair after trying to shoot up a church or whatever it is you right-wing extremists do.
>sick cucks
Muh buzzword!

Do you leik chocolate cake? I hope this image triggers the fuck out of you. For the group that always talks about feminists being easily offended you racists sure are easy as hell to offend.

>>23588495
>Thank fuck people like you wont be around in a few decades.

I have a girlfriend. Like most angry bitter /pol/ posters you don't. Keep up the projection!

>>23588567
why wont they be around?

>>23584624
>my thing was just looking at pear-shaped girls. Pears make the world go around
o_O nice to hear some love for the pear-shaped girls :D

>>23585403
I like to submit, it's different from rape because rape is by definition having sex with someone you don't want to have sex with.

>>23588448
>uncut cocks
Yes.

File: 1455343144013.jpg (344KB, 800x584px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 800x584px

>>23588549
>bernfag detected

>>23586851
Don't fuck with that older pussy bro. Infertile and dry as fuck.

All I masturbate to is interracial or anything with a hung black guy. It's upsetting how obsessed I am. I've had so many chances to suck a black dick but I have a gf and my conscious gets in the way.

Incest porn is my favorite

I like jav, usually the weird the story the better.

Now I live in Japan and am going to be in one, filming is tomorrow night.

File: 1431271876215.png (166KB, 467x500px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 467x500px

>>23584624
>I don't really watch porn anymore these days because I view women as a whole with more pride than that.

>>23590298
Wow cool, Whats the pay like?

I know alot of porn producers believe the pussy is the guys payment.

>>23588281
>Yes. Women aren't "more likely" to have tattoos because you happened to see one.
interracial couples are more likely to divorce, the woman is more likely to be abused and the children are more likely to have mental health issues. I just threw the tattoos in there because I know you'd get pissy if I said that I judged those poor women with tramp stamps. you're very predictable
>blablabla if you like someone it's all that matters! I'm a woman, hear me roar
check your privilege. the sexual marketplace is unfair. black women and asian men are heavily disenfranchised. I'll stop suspecting racial fetishizing or similar things when the statistics are equal between all interracial couples.
>To point out the logical fallacy of you suggesting that everyone should avoid black people
I never said this
>Whites are not 80% of the population.
1991
>That only happens when you include Hispanics.
The statistics for non-white hispanics are also included. Learn to read.
>Well "white people" is unscientific and ultimately meaningless
So why did you bring it up if you weren't going to commit to the argument? Do you have some sort of cognitive issues?
>I know. Self-reflection is hard for people like you.
Shut the fuck up you boring twat
Bring something substantial next time or stop responding

>>23591219
This place is specifically one of those. They pay you bus fare, basically. They are pretty low budget and dont get mad if you fuck up or cant nut so it seems fair.

I'm in it for the experience anyway.

>>23591490
fug, this is still going on?

>>23591490
>interracial couples are more likely to divorce
Divorce rate is high regardless. Of course the more "taboo" one is going to be more affected.
>the woman is more likely to be abused
[citation needed]
And again that's like saying social conservatives are more likely to be inbred, so you shouldn't date one just in case. It's so statistically insignificant in the first place that it's an intellectually dishonest argument. Domestic violence is more of a function of being smart about picking your partner, not race. Don't pick some retard or some ghetto person or a sociopath.
>the children are more likely to have mental health issues
[citation needed]
And also if that's true in some places it's an aspect of environment and society. Smart children are also more likely to suffer from depression growing up. Should we ban people with high IQ?

>>23591490
>the children are more likely to have mental health issues
[citation needed]
And also if that's true in some places it's an aspect of environment and societal things like bullying. Smart children are also more likely to suffer from depression growing up. Should we ban people with high IQ?
> I just threw the tattoos in there because I know you'd get pissy if I said that I judged those poor women with tramp stamps
What? I never said anything about judging people with tattoos. I said that it's a logical fallacy to assume that people doing unrelated activity X have them because you happened to see one somewhere. This is an ENTIRELY different argument, dumbfuck. You're apparently so stupid that you not only fail to grasp your fallacies, but that when you try to actually use your brain you end up on the entirely wrong axis. That's impressive I have to admit.
>you're very predictable
When you're slow everything seems predictable.
>check your privilege
Shave your neckbeard.
>black women are heavily disenfranchised.
Not true, actually. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/beautiful-minds/201105/black-women-are-not-rated-less-attractive-our-independent-analysis-the-a

>>23591490
>I'll stop suspecting racial fetishizing or similar things when
You'll stop suspecting "racial fetishizing" or similar things when you start using your brain and stop being an emotionally wounded puppy who needs an excuse. Unless you have data the argument is bunk. The argument is not a logical one, it's an emotional one based on the fact that you don't like them and need to "justify" them. Stop equating interracial dating with fetishizing. Not every interracial relationship is based on a "fetish". It's not a radical idea that two people might date because they like eachother and have things in common.
>I never said this
Backpedalling only makes you look worse.
>1991
White people were not 80% of the population in 1991. Try again. That only happens when you include Hispanics.
>The statistics for non-white hispanics are also included. Learn to read.
And it's not 80%. It's 75%. Take your own advice, my dim-witted friend. Are you too retarded to read your own source or something? I bet you feel extremely stupid right now.
>So why did you bring it up if you weren't going to commit to the argument?
I did commit to the argument. Just because I provide background information does not mean I'm not "committing to the argument". That's why it was followed up with "but you're reading the data wrong".

Are you just inventing things in your head to rationalize being so thoroughly dismantled?

>>23591490
>Shut the fuck up you boring twat
The baby is mad. Man up. Then again I'd be pretty mad too if I was admitted low value loser in real-life (>>23583882), but also on the internet a bitter neckbeard who can't even manage to string together basic arguments without bashing his head into a fallacy.

Ugly people are usually, at the very least, mentally competent. That doesn't seem to be the case with you. I feel bad for your parents — they really hit the jackpot.
>Bring something substantial next time or stop responding
Take your own advice.

File: Geoscape-US-Pop-Estimates-by-Race-1990-2019-Mar2014.png (45KB, 1000x550px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 1000x550px

>>23592680
Non-Hispanic Whites were 76% of the population in 1990, which is still higher than the figure quoted for child sexual abuse he quoted.

Gotta learn to pick your battles.

>Divorce rate is high regardless.

Whether it's high or low is a relative thing. The rates are high relative to say, the 1950s. But relative to the rate of divorce for Black Male/White Female marriages, it's low.

Black Male/White Females marriages are over twice as likely to divorce as White Male/White Female, and nearly four times as likely as Asian Male/Asian Female.

That means something like 9 out of every 10 BM/WF couple divorces. Those are pretty insane numbers.

File: divorce_3.jpg (65KB, 584x358px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 584x358px

>>23592688
>if I was admitted low value loser in real-life

Not him, but I feel inclined to defend him given your incessant shitposting.

What do you do for a living?

>>23592701
>>23592711
>Non-Hispanic Whites were 76% of the population in 1990
75.6%. It's only 80% when you include Hispanics.

He claimed he wasn't including Hispanics and that it was still 80%. In reality he was too dumb to read "non-hispanic white" even after I told him to look for it. He was wrong.

>Gotta learn to pick your battles.
Yes, we know you do. See >>23586912

>Black Male/White Females marriages are over twice as likely to divorce as White Male/White Female, and nearly four times as likely as Asian Male/Asian Female.
Of course they'll be relatively higher due to things like social stigma and pressure, but that's declining and it's been found that factors like the age of marriage and educational qualifications had greater bearing on the stability and longevity of such marriages than the racial identities of the individuals.

Furthermore, black wife/white husband marriages are 44% LESS LIKELY to divorce than white male/white female.

>Not him, but I feel inclined to defend him given your incessant shitposting. What do you do for a living?
He admitted it himself. You can't defend him from who he is.

>>23592767
>75.6%. It's only 80% when you include Hispanics.

The point he was trying to make were that white people were underrepresented in the only dataset on child sexual abuse available.

>Furthermore, black wife/white husband marriages are 44% LESS LIKELY to divorce than white male/white female.

The sample size for that pairing was relatively small as it's a relatively uncommon pairing.

>and it's been found that factors like the age of marriage and educational qualifications

These are symptomatic, low-value white women marry black men (one dataset breaks down racial pairings by income, black male/white female was the white female cohort with the lowest average income).

>He admitted it himself. You can't defend him from who he is.

Don't smack a man for being honesty while being too chickenshit to reciprocate the honesty.

>>23592664
>[citation needed]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611980/
>Domestic violence is more of a function of being smart
yea, I'm questioning the intelligence of people that are less bothered by higher risks of abuse :)
>[citation needed]
http://www.sec-ed.co.uk/news/mixed-race-children-at-greater-risk-of-mental-health-issues
>I said that it's a logical fallacy to assume that people doing unrelated activity X have them because you happened to see one somewhere.
There are obviously no studies on the subject, there's only conjecture. You'd have to be stupid to believe otherwise. There's only this
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-games/201305/how-do-people-view-women-tattoos
>Not true, actually
http://www.citylab.com/politics/2013/11/uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-online-dating/7662/
http://newamericamedia.org/2010/07/black-people-least-desirable-in-mix-marriages.php
> Not every interracial relationship is based on a "fetish"
Never said this.
>Backpedalling only makes you look worse.
Where did I say this?
>And it's not 80%. It's 75%. Take your own advice, my dim-witted friend. Are you too retarded to read your own source or something? I bet you feel extremely stupid right now.
It still means they were underrepresented, meaning you spouted outright lies to make some half-assed point. Keep the lies coming, it's really entertaining

>Take your own advice.
You haven't made one salient point so far. You lie, you're fucking boring and you're predictable. This is getting tiresome.

>>23592785
>The point he was trying to make were that white people were underrepresented in the only dataset on child sexual abuse available.
No, it's still a relative over-representation.

>The sample size for that pairing was relatively small as it's a relatively uncommon pairing.
Backpedaling. They're all relatively uncommon. Doesn't change the fact that black wife/white husband marriages are 44% less likely to divorce than white male/white female. Discrediting things that shoot a hole in your argument isn't going to work.

>These are symptomatic, low-value white women marry black men
Wrong. Again, it's been found that factors like the age of marriage and educational qualifications had greater bearing on the stability and longevity of such marriages than the racial identities of the individuals. Emphasis on "greater bearing".

>one dataset breaks down racial pairings by income, black male/white female was the white female cohort with the lowest average income
This is because black people on average make less than white people. Although that's changing fast historically there's a very large wealth gap due to discrimination and a lack of opportunities.

http://www.demos.org/blog/9/23/14/white-high-school-dropouts-have-more-wealth-black-and-hispanic-college-graduates#.VCQggdLlnvE.twitter

The income gaps between interracial couples contributes more to likelihood of divorce than race.

>>23592821
>No, it's still a relative over-representation.

How exactly?

>They're all relatively uncommon

This statement literally makes no sense. Read it back to yourself. Relative to WM/BF, there are something like 8 times as many WM/AF marriages.

>it's been found that factors like the age of marriage and educational qualifications had greater bearing on the stability and longevity of such marriages than the racial identities of the individuals.

Then find a dataset which compares likelihood of divorce between SES and race.

>This is because black people on average make less than white people.

I'm talking about the white females in such marriages. They make less than the white females in every single other pairing.

File: 64643-55006.jpg (16KB, 460x275px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 460x275px

>>23592785
>Don't smack a man for being honesty while being too chickenshit to reciprocate the honesty.
I wasn't smacking him for being honest. I was smacking him for being a low value sexual loser which is, of course, not surprising to anyone here.
>>23592808
>I'm questioning the intelligence of people that are less bothered by higher risks of abuse :)
Your partner's income bracket and education says more about likelihood of abuse than race. Dating a trailer trash white Hell's Angel biker puts you at higher chance of abuse than dating a middle-class white collar black guy who works in finance.

I'm questioning the intelligence of people that fail to understand simple things like this, and instead prefer to paint complex situations with broad brushes and generalize based on statistically unlikely things.

>There are obviously no studies on the subject, there's only conjecture. You'd have to be stupid to believe otherwise. There's only this
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-games/201305/how-do-people-view-women-tattoos

Yes that's conjecture, and again, I never said anything about judging people with tattoos. I said that it's a logical fallacy to assume that people doing unrelated activity X have them because you happened to see one somewhere. This is not a hard concept to grasp. Apple != Banana.
>http://www.citylab.com/politics/2013/11/uncomfortable-racial-preferences-revealed-online-dating/7662/
Not true, actually. Pic related.
>Never said this.
You implied it.

>>23592808
>Where did I say this?
Denial isn't going to work.
>You haven't made one salient point so far. You lie, you're fucking boring and you're predictable. This is getting tiresome.
All that projection must be really tiring.