I don't get this board. All the rate threads require you

How about you post some titties first.

>>23343721
No

>>23343738
How about you sum up you OP in to 4 words or less, so anybody can be bothered to read.

>>23343758
/Soc/ is ugly circlejerk

>>23343758
How about a haiku?

Uglys post and rate
Just patting each other's backs
"It's you again 9/10 :)"

>>23344022
This

>>23343716
same reason why there's a fuckton of skype threads, kik threads, and such.
There's more than one way to get rated like there's more than one way to have other different kind of threads. and the people that participate in rate threads like feeling validated in different ways. So they start a new thread and the typical rate posters see the word "rate" then go in.
I don't see why it's a big deal. What genius threads are you going to start that are less cancerous than the 6(point 5) different kind of rate threads going on?

>>23344067
Half my post was about how people are shitty at rating others and just hand out high ratings to people who are objectively sub 5s.

>>23343716
What would you do to make it better OP?
Please tell us....pls OP
I'm dying to hear how you'd fix the problem. It seems like you already have it all figured out with this great post.

Ratings are subjective anyways

>>23344067
GINGI
SPOTTED
6.5

>>23344112
I won't explain people's shitty rates and shittier taste. I'm just going to try to find a reason for things I CAN explain.

>>23344112
>objectively
i don't think you know what that word means

>>23344190
nahh. I've posted in like 2 rate threads in the past month. I'm more of the AMA and assumption threads person. Just trying to be reasonable about it

>>23344112
>everyone has exactly the same taste as me right?
But its probably more like
>I get low rates so if I say everyone else is ugly then I come out on top!

>>23344919
Sometimes I get 8+, other times I get 5+ but never below. I don't get the discrepancy, especially when I look at the internal consistency of anons ratings.