Look at my argument against the Riemann hypothesis >On T

File: 1480123074886.jpg (125KB, 482x403px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 482x403px

>vixra

>we propose a solution to the Banach-Tarski paradox
dis gun b gud

I guess the main flaw with your argument is that you fail to produce a nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function with real part unequal to one half.

>>9169017
You've been posting this for months.

>>9169111

Yes, but he presented his argument in LaTeX, so it must be legit. I suppose you *could* present a counter-example to the Riemann Hypothesis by scribbling down a non-trivial zero of the zeta function whos real part does not equal one half on a piece of paper, but who would want to be so plebian about it?

File: TRUE.png (25KB, 524x465px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 524x465px

>>9169111

If I had had that then I would have called it a disproof instead of an argument.

>>9169368
That would actually be the most patrician way to do it.

>just submit a soiled napkin with a complex number and your name on it to the Clay Institute
Absolutely based.

>>9169368
>>9171031
the absolute thought of this makes my sides hurt

>>just submit a soiled napkin with a complex number and your name on it to the Clay Institute.

This guy maths!

I for one support the notion that all works of genius be submitted on a soiled napkin. I imagine Perelmen's proof of the Poincare conjecture was initially scribbled on a cum-stained bedsheet.