Here's the Axiom of Potential Infinity. "There exist

I thought from the thumbnail that someone took a shit on a dick

nice, you did absolutely nothing.

>>9168281
Now we don't have to deal with Banach-Tarski nonsense

What if [math]n\,=\,\aleph_0[/math]? Where are my 72 virgins now?

>>9168188
>>9168286
what the fuck are you talking about
you don't need an axiom for this nonsense. take any finite set and add [math]n[\math] distinct new elements to it and you will obtain another finite set. repeat this process as much as you want and you will will only obtain finite sets after every iteration as long as [math]n[\math] is a finite ordinal. this all follows from directly from ZF.
do you have brain damage?

>>9168308
This axiom is meant to replace the axiom of infinity from set theory. If you can't get something this easy I don't know what to tell you.

>>9168318
it doesn't provide for infinite sets nor is it independent from ZF minus Infinity
if you can't get something this easy i don't know what to tell you.

>>9168339
>>>9168318 (You)
>it doesn't provide for infinite sets
There are no infinite sets, only potentially infinite sets.
>nor is it independent from ZF minus Infinity
Tell me then, how many natural numbers there are (without infinity)?

>>9168361
oh okay, you're shitposting
at least for your sake i hope you are
carry on

>>9168364
no answer
carry on

File: IMG_9157.jpg (49KB, 600x656px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x656px

>>9168253
u mad white boi?