In the fundamentals (at the very core if you like) of mathematics, is there something else than addition, subtraction, division and multiplication?
When you do any equation, in the end, it all comes down to these 4, right?
>>9167945
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_function
If you define natural numbers using axiomatic set theory, then not only does 1+1 equal 2, but you can further break that "2" into a bunch nested of sets.
>>9167945
Pshhh, sure, if you only wanna live in the rational numbers.
Good luck defining pi or 2^.5 with just the four basic operations, and no limits or whatnot
>>9167970
God I hate her annoying face. Roasties
>>9168032
Shut your fucking mouth or I ask my moderator brother to ban you. Koreans are top-tier qts.
>>9167945
Parenthesis, or if you prefer, brackets. They literally cause people to invent imaginary math.
For example, if I do 1+(1), someone is going to insist the answer is 1.
>>9167945
in abstract algebra you can define structures with operations that may or may not have anything to do with those 4
>>9167945
Yes, HTT, category theory or set theory are all "more fundamental", but much less intuitive.
The basic number sytems and operations all have real-world examples making them more suited to teach to children.
>>9167945
I hate these threads where OP comes along and asks a dumb question, then doesn't even bother to check up on it. Like at least indicate that some of this is getting through your thick skull.
>>9168463
Whats htt? Nothing show up when I google it.
>>9168724
Homotopy type theory
>>9167945
pretty sure multiplication and division boil down to addition and subtraction
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunking_(division)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grid_method_multiplication
>>9168745
Not really. How do you use those definitions to calculate:
[math]e \sqrt{2} [/math]