literally what? wouldn't t be a free variable here? wouldn't the solutions just be
x1=6y-3t-2
x2=y
x3=-34t+7
x4=-5t+8
x5=t
why was this whole "make it in terms of w" needed? am i insane here?
>>9164419
In the first step it says that t is not a free variable. Whoever wrote this solution is retarded though.
>>9164463
I dont understand. Its not a leading variable.
>>9164481
It clearly is. Since it was defined that way. Would help if you showed the entire problem though.
In this problem, you can make whichever two of the five variables you wish to be the free variables. Any choice is fine.
>>9164570
it just says to solve this system.
>>9164576
how? i thought this shit needed specific variables based on the leading 1s of a matrix.