>91% of human DNA is considered trash by scientists >somehow

>>9164184
>91% of human DNA is considered trash by scientists

Le ebin factoid!

>>9164184
if aliens so dam good, why they junk all dat DNA
shit make no sence

>>9164188
most of that DNA was turned off, not really trash.

>>9164193
>turned off
yeh cuz they like light switches rite? yeah, yeah rite kid

>>9164193
WE

>>9164184
>implying 91% of our DNA are viruses in their lysogenic cycle and that humanity won't just explode into a cloud of viruses once they activate

>>9164423
*aren't viruses
I meant to say.

the exploding part is bullshit but the broken lysogenic virus DNA theory is real. look it up

>>9164184
How is that evidence of ayy lmaos genetic engineering?

>what are transposons
>what are buffers to deleterious mutations
>what are the reasons pros have low intergenic space while euks have tons

brainlet

>>9164423
You're only about 60% viral lettovers

File: images (11).jpg (20KB, 362x362px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 362x362px

>tfw you are 91% trash

>they say humans only use 9% of their genome.she uses 100.

> scientists know only what their scientific method allows them to know
> scientists know little about memetics

Who wants to live a comfy and meaningful life when you can live an ironic one?

>literally what are long range control elements
>he doesn't probe upstream 100kb for enhancers
brainlets up in here

>>9164468
YOU are 100%.

>>9164469
>gets turned into a flash drive

File: 1475535085949.png (55KB, 571x553px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 571x553px

>All that garbage code

Our designers were CS grads?

>>9164184
If ayylmaos engineered us we'd have no junk dna
If we were intelligently designed by any intelligent entity we'd have no junk dna
Having what high school biology students refer to as junk dna just reinforces long periods of evolution.