https://nypost.com/2017/09/08/vikin g-skeletons-dna-test-pro

File: jesuschristhowcostanza2.png (66KB, 214x210px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 214x210px

>https://nypost.com/2017/09/08/viking-skeletons-dna-test-proves-historians-wrong

>>9162614
>Be powerful male Viking with status
>Your favorite maiden dies of sickness in the rough winter, not fit for women
>For her burial you want to show her the utmost respect and give her something of yours to go with
>Leave some of the weapons and armor you used to fight for her as a sign of undying love
>2000 years later faggots think a weak fucking woman was doing viking shit

Ok, I think this has been long overdue. This weird and random point-scoring system the genders are doing has to end. Just looking at history to find how many "kewl women" we can find to give more points to women is stupid. Lets just resolve this issue once and for all.

Randomly pick 10 men and 10 women as average as they come. Be sure they have no special talents at all. Then for a year:

1) Train a man and a woman to play chess
2) Train a man and a woman to do hand to hand combat (martial arts)
3) Train a man and a woman to do armed combat (swords)
4) Train a man and a woman to shoot (either guns or bows)
5) Train a man and a woman to do math olympiads
6) Train a man and a woman to do IQ tests
7) Train a man and a woman to do crossword puzzles
8) Train a man and a woman to do weight lifting
9) Train a man and a woman to do speed running
10) Train a man and a woman to drive

Then at the end of the year have them all directly face off against each other. Give the chess players a best of 3, make the fighters fight one on one, give the math ones the next IMO problems, let the drivers race in Tokyo, etc.

Then count how many men win and how many women win. The winning gender becomes the supeior one and the other gets demoted to second class citizens.

AND DONE.
DONE WITH THIS STUPID GAME OF WHICH GENDER IS BETTER BULLSHIT.

File: feminist ants.jpg (448KB, 1000x923px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1000x923px

>>9162631
Civilization was built on people doing their niche job very well. Someone is trying to tear this down.

>>9162664
"""""""""""someone"""""""""""

File: mfw101.jpg (40KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 720x720px

>>9162631
Or you could just establish a capitalist economy and allow people to educate themselves in a way that suits their needs and interests and allow them to enter the job market based on what is needed by society, look at surveys of job demographics, median annual incomes, and using a supply/demand with incomes being loosely connected to the demand and figure out which demographics provide more for society.

Or just do it your way.

>>9162689
>pure capitalism
Lel. Pleb.
Mixed economy is the only way to go if you want to ensure a high standard of living and simultaneously a strong and adaptable financial backbone.

File: mfw42.png (456KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 600x450px

>>9162691
Oh, look at you.

Taxes and other financial regulatory burdens means that producers must raise their prices to achieve the same profit margins or even to stay profitable. Because prices raise, people will need higher wages to purchase the things they need. Businesses that would've otherwise stayed in business with low regulations and low taxes are now crippled or gone. The job market is now limited to the companies that can meet the ever-demanding government burdens.

No matter how much money you dump into welfare and food stamps, the economy is now worse in a way that a government paycheck can not even begin to compensate for.

Repeat for catastrophic market failure.