[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Where my Biofags at? What do you do? What would you say

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 154
Thread images: 12

File: biology-14-lg[1].jpg (75KB, 715x415px) Image search: [Google]
biology-14-lg[1].jpg
75KB, 715x415px
Where my Biofags at? What do you do? What would you say are the best subfields.
>>
>>9158697
R-right here senpai...

C-cryonics...
>>
>>9158726
>>9158697
Good to see the biofags interacting. Big boy mathfag here, you have my permission to conversate on /sci/. Go ahead.
>>
File: 2017-09-09-22-43-23-498243846.jpg (8KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]
2017-09-09-22-43-23-498243846.jpg
8KB, 259x194px
>>9158729
We're not little >.<"
>>
>>9158729
>Mathfag
Are you an engineer or a teacher? Either way I don't envy you.
>>
>>9158697
Ecology, evolution and theoretical biology in general, are the best fields. >Microbiology
Snooze fest
>>9158729
>not being /math/ and a /bioboi/
For shame
>>
>what do you do

studied microbio and got my bachelors, wanted to get into research but after seeing how many grads/postgrads were miserable I said fuck it and decided to go into a CLS program instead since it still focuses on what I like, molecular bio with good job outlooks in California. Have to complete a course in hematology/analytical chem before I can apply for the program, looking for a job atm but eduacation comes first so that limits my search
>>
File: virgin.png (10KB, 85x70px) Image search: [Google]
virgin.png
10KB, 85x70px
>>9158729
>Big boy mathfag here
pic related

>>9158753
>ecology
>best field

wew lad, call me when ecologist stop constantly fighting each other over stupid bullshit like dilution effect
>>
File: 1489020313756.jpg (389KB, 731x971px) Image search: [Google]
1489020313756.jpg
389KB, 731x971px
>be virgin computer """""science""""" major
>will work on project with a bunch of veterinarians and biologists
>looking at the e-mail list, a good 80% seems to be women

Are am I in for? I literally never worked with women before.
>>
>What would you say are the best subfields.

top tier:
-molecular biology
-biochemisty
-microbiology
-genetics

high tier:
-bioinformatics
-pathology
-physiology (as well as subcategories e.g. cardiology, endocrinology, etc)
biophysics
mathematical biology

mid tier:
-general biology
-marine biology
-evolutionary biology
-cell biology
-zoology

low tier:
-ecology
-anatomy

meme:
-astrobiology (for now at least)
>>
>>9158753
Are there any jobs in those fields?
>>
>>9158815
I wanna do astrobiology
Wouldn't that be so coooooool
>>
>>9158813
nice blast post
>>
>>9158833

I don't know what a blast post is
>>
>>9158823
yes, and almost all the good ones are in academia and are highly competitive. This acts like a pleb filter.
>>
>>9158800
alright, ill give you ac all in about 40 years after all the ecologists finally commit suicide over not having anything to research.
>>
>>9158815
If it isn't computational biology it's a meme
>>
>>9158815
Neurosci is high tier, soon to be top tier
>>
>>9158697
>2013 + 4
>not saying life science instead of biology
>>
File: pepe the frog.jpg (35KB, 780x438px) Image search: [Google]
pepe the frog.jpg
35KB, 780x438px
Can ecologists explain why all bioslags can't get enough of the big math cock? Literally get blow jobs for helping then solve quadratic equations ... this is just sad, it's not even funny.
>>
How is population biology? I want a job where I look at populations change and evolve.
>>
>>9158857
I'm transferring to your school ASAP
>>
I am decent at math. What jobs can I get in biology that isn't pure math but still let me use it?
>>
>>9158861
>school
>>
File: pshhh.jpg (192KB, 1032x774px) Image search: [Google]
pshhh.jpg
192KB, 1032x774px
>>9158861

there's room for only one alpha male ...
>>
>>9158864
theoretical eco/evo/bio are the most math oriented, but math can be readily applied pretty much everywhere
>>
>>9158815
this is correct.
t. biochemist
>>
>>9158857
if you have the "i'm bad at math" mindset bio becomes the literal only hard science that's accessible to you
>>
>>9158726
>>9158742
>biology
>"cryonics"
>using anime pictures
Way to oust yourself as a disgusting and probably transexual high-schooler.
>>9158753
>ecology
>evolution
>"theoretical biology"
Aka "I just read the wikipedia entry for biology and now I pretend I'm an expert on /sci/". Kill yourself faggot.

>>9158697
Computational, biophysics and biochemistry are the best "subfields" overall.
>>
>>9158931
Your heart is almost as cold as some of our experiments. I like that.

<3
>>
>>9158853
agreed forgot to add it

>>9158852
>hey guys I like math do I fit in yet?
>>
>>9158815
dogshit tier:
nutrition
>>
>>9158942
don't think that falls under bio
>>
>>9158854
"life science" doesn't fit stuff like molecular biology and genetics as well as "biology"
>>
>>9158931
>Aka "I just read the wikipedia entry for biology and now I pretend I'm an expert on /sci/". Kill yourself faggot.
This is quite an assumption, and I think you are mad because I left out your pet subject.
Theoretical science is heavy on math, this should go without contest. Ecology in particular uses partial diffs, graph theory, systems theory, et ala the most. Not to mention any statistics. Evolutionary science and theoretical biology should go without saying too. Ive been studying biology with autistic fervor ever since I was around 2 years old and could tell my mom since I what encyclopedia I wanted to read. You are a weird, hateful person.
>>
>>9158949
Molecular biology and genetics are still characteristic of living systems. Using biology as a general term to refer to the science of life at higher scales of analysis than biological systems, like ecology and evolution doesn't make sense. So life science makes a a better general term as the general needs to supervene on all particulars in the set.
>>
File: IMG_0432.jpg (200KB, 1250x828px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0432.jpg
200KB, 1250x828px
Wildlife fag here.

I get paid to hike and hold cute animals.
>>
File: IMG_0176.jpg (3MB, 4027x3017px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0176.jpg
3MB, 4027x3017px
>>9159006
Also get to live in amazing places
>>
>>9158852
comp bio is literally a meme
>>
>>9158963
>people modelling biological systems use math
Wow what a fucking surprise buddy.
>theoretical biology should go without saying too
"""theoretical""" biology is a vague catch-all phrase that doesn't mean anything. Actually thinking it's a field of its own screams ignorance.
> Ive been studying biology with autistic fervor ever since I was around 2 years old
Congratulations my friend. Now come back when you've graduated high-school.
>You are a weird, hateful person.
Now that is something I cannot argue against.
>>
>>9159158
>Actually thinking it's a field of its own screams ignorance.
the use of mathematical theory to model biological systems isn't a distinct field?
explain this http://rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/12/105/20141383 and the rest of the entire field of theoretical biology.
ecology, biochem and molecular biology are all the same in regards to their scope, they all have broad areas of inquiry. yet i dont see you contesting them as fields. you know nothing contrarian fuckboy. anon was asking for a field to concentrate in. not a research focus.
if you have an undergraduate degree and i doubt you do, you need to go back to school, trade school. As you dont have a grasp on the material you are talking about
>>
Medfag here. Is medicine a legitimate answer?
If not, I will go with ecology / animal behavior. That was my favorite course in undergrad.
>>
>>9159158
also note that theoretical biology and theoretical ecology are not the same field. Ecological systems are not biological systems they are systems that result of the reciprocal interactions of biological systems. whether or not ecological systems are living systems is unclear, personally I believe they likely are, they definitely are not biological systems however.
>>
Genetics here, going to try and get into PhD programs soon - hopefully something in genomics, possibly looking into the effects of abiotic stress on gene expression in hops or barley.
>>
>>9159192
no its not, and im not just saying that because im in ecology. eco-ethological interactions are incredibly interesting, especially when eco-evolutionary dynamics are thrown in the mix.
>>
I want to study evolution and community interation. What should I major in?
>>
Ecologists - is it just the few in my University, or are most ecologists all dead set on the global warming train? In my required Ecology course, the professor legitimately promoted people not having children - especially in 3rd world countries - because of the carbon footprint or some shit.
>>
>>9159235
I like ecology but I dont want to be a tree hugger, i just want to study interactions between organisms
>>
>>9159229
math, minor in bio
>>9159235
yes, ecologists see the worst of global warning and understand the behavior of dynamic systems well
>promoted people not having children - especially in 3rd world countries
sounds like a doofus that doesnt understand actor-networks and the drivers of global change at all, to me/ that being said when explaining such complex problems to people who couldn't understand its very tempting to just scare them instead
>>
>>9159247
>i just want to study interactions between organisms
thats how you end up making sweet love to a forest instead of hugging trees
>>
>>9159258
>Minor in bio
I like bio too much. I am thinking of minoring in math though.
>>
>>9159269
that works just fine.
>>
>>9159258
Would Biostatistics count?
>>
>>9159273
yes, statistics are one of the biggest things for what you want to do, just try to take enough courses that focus on marco biology.
The best thing that you can is read the literature in the fields you are interested in your free time and get research experience as an undergrad.
>>
>>9159177
>explain this
Could just as easily be called computational biology or biophysics. As I said, it's a catch all phrase, not a distinct field. If believe otherwise you're most likely literally in high-school. Nobody becomes a "theoretical biologist".
>yet i dont see you contesting them as fields
Because they have established domains of inquiry, where-as anything from protein MD simulations to modelling population dynamics of flies in a pile of shit could fall under "le theoretical biology XD".
>if you have an undergraduate degree
I do, unlike you.
>>
>>9159273
>>9159284
Sort of related, how difficult are most Stats classes compared to your normal sci maths like Calc 2?
>>
>>9159258
Eh, he was more likely to be a doofus than just trying to scare people. He frequently displayed graphs in lecture that had half the figure missing, or no axis labels. Even if I asked him about it after class, he'd blow me off. Hell, he frequently dismissed class early and wasted time discussing things unrelated to the course material.

Worst part of all - he's absolutely obsessed with his research, something about algae, but his lab is staffed with incompetent undergraduate girls who are more looks than brains. They're known for causing problems with any equipment they use - one even waisted an entire tank of liquid nitrogen by not fully closing the valve.
>>
>>9159258
>Have less children
I don't get this solution. As a Bio major he should understand that natural selection dictates that if you don't have children than the people who don't care will and overtake you. Humans aren't going to completely stop having children.
>>
>>9159177
Theoretical biology is a tool. Modelling should always be followed and verified by experiments, as many mathematical models oversimplify biological systems too much to draw any worthwhile conclusions. Hence, theoretical biology is not an independent field; it fits within the field that the experimental part fits into. If you are modelling embryonic development, you're a developmental biologist, not a theoretical biologist. If you are modelling hysteresis in ecosystems, you are an ecologist (though a theoretical one), not a theoretical biologist. If you are not actually interested in experimentally verifying your theories by working together with experimental biologists, you are hardly contributing to biology.
>>
>>9159534
I get what you are saying, I suppose I view theoretical biology in a stricter sense than most use. I view theoretical biology as a transdisciplinary research agenda aimed at identifying general properties of biological systems. This is why I separated theoretical ecology and theoretical evolution from theoretical biology. This is all just semantic confusion around 'biology'. I'm aware of the interface between empirical and theoretical science.
>>
>>9159320
I hate to be a stickler but natural selection would not be involved. NS is a process that happens after behavior, what would really be at work is ecosystem(population) dynamics
>>
>>9159006

Get bitten by ticks many times?
>>
>>9158697
Biophysics grad student, research interests in in structural biology with an emphasis on protein-NMR methods development.

Any list of the best sub-fields is open to ambiguity, given how sub-fields are defined. I'd say that this list is decent: >>9158815. I'd move chemical biology and structural biology to the top tier, then move microbiology to mid-tier.

I could say the "hottest" sub-fields, from scanning the literature, following the science blogosphere, talking to people in the fields, etc.
First, the world of molecular biology and genetics has been white-hot over the last few years, largely attributed in particular to the potential of genome editing by CRISPR and the CRISPR/Cas system.

Second, chemical biology is becoming more and more prominent, evolving as its own discipline, as a means to probe and characterize biological systems and pathways.

Third, in drug discovery, "difficult-to-target" epigenetic targets and protein-protein interactions are garnering plenty of attention.

Fourth, in structural biology, I still think we're in the Cryo-EM craze, but the initial excitement is starting to ease up. No doubt that structural biology has undergone a transformation and EM is hot, but now EM is settling in, more or less, and any talk of it taking over has subsided. Still, if you want a tenure-track position at an R1, you'd have (relatively) good odds as a microscopist.

>>9158815
>>
>>9159534
>>9159759

guys tell me, what are some popular views in theoretical biology.
>>
>>9159833
Subjects in theoretical biology in this sense>>9159759
that have been of interest to me lately is the free energy principle and especially biosemiotics
>>
>>9159974
I know who you are faggot, gtfo.
>>
>>9158697
Starting my first year of pharmacy school
I'm fucked because of the insane saturation. Every pre-med failure/dropout has pharm as the second choice so yeah.

There is no best subfields. Bio is fucking dead and you're going to be poor forever.
>>
Biophysics and evolution are absolutely top-tier.

Genomics is reaching meme status.

Ecology is massively underrated.
>>
>>9159986
ohhhh no, gotta blast
>>
>>9159986
i really should become a namefag so plebs can hate me harder
>>
>>9159994
>pre-med
>biology
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
premeds, and to a lesser extent trustafarians ruin the intellectual atmosphere in undergrad bio programs.
life sciences are not about making money. We aren't a part of your system. As life is literally externalized in consumer economies.
>>
>>9158697
>B
>i
>o
>l
>o
>g
>y

>H
>a
>r
>d

>S
>c
>i
>e
>n
>c
>e
>>
>>9160124
k
enjoy being poor
>>
>>9158815
>>9158931
I thought biochemistry was considered a subfield of chemistry, not biology? Or is it both?
>>
Any other sensory physiology / chemical ecology fags here?
>>
>>9160210
It's a useless distinction; these fields lie in the overlap with biology and other fields. "Pure" qualitative biology itself is slowly becoming a thing of the past, and cutting edge research is becoming more and more reliant on the quantitative methods and ways of thinking.
>>
>>9160210
a lot of biochemistry is actually pretty physics based, tons of thermodynamics and shit in it as well.
>>
>>9160194
enjoy not having to do critical thinking. The sooner you realize money doesnt bring you happiness, the more freeing your life and opportunities to make yourself happy become.
>>
>>9160433
>money doesnt bring you happiness
If that was the case mr.sheklestein wouldn't care so much about his profits
>>
>>9160666
you are assuming mr. sheklestein is happy.
>>
>>9160674
Oh he is
Stop justifying your wage slavery anon
>>
>>9159790
there have been too many advances in humanity from microbio despite the extremely small pool of experimental microbia to move it into mid tier
>>
>>9160210
can be both depending on what you emphasize
>>
>>9160707
>Stop justifying your wage slavery anon
wage slaves make more than my stipend, i can assure you. But im happier than most, money doesnt take that away from me, nor would it add to it.
>>
>>9159788
I treat my clothes with permethrin so it's not an issue.
>>
>>9160214
I'm the biosemiotics fag and into ecology so it's of particular interest to me, but I'm not into physics or chemistry so it's relatively unaccessible.
Tell me about what you do, do you focus on anything in particular? Like the interactions between soil biotia
>>
>>9160002
>Want to study evolutionary biology
>Don't know if I should actually major in evolutionary biology or do something that is similar with good job security
>Population genetics, Biostatistics, Theoretical biology, Community ecology, computational biology, ect, ect too many fucking choices without knowing what's best
>>
>>9160194
Enjoy working 60 hours a week and being stressed all the time with little sleep.
I don't care if you make twice as much money as I do, I wont envy you. Premeds are dead inside and boring and live an unhappy life.
>>
>>9162593
just go as a normal bio major and take classes that interests you as electives. if it's possible, ask a evolutionary biologist for which classes that you should take.
>>
>>9158697
Neuroscience. My PhD is in Alzheimer's
>>
Biochem major here
Is bioinformatics any good? I really don't know what to do after my bachelors, bioinformatics sounds good but I dunno, I want something math related to back my degree.
>>
Honestly, I'm not a biology guy, but biomedical engineering is a possibility for me. Sounds really interesting.
>>
>>9162829
There's a lot of random facts about various aspects of the disease from the plaques to changes in neurotransmitters and such. What do you think are the truly important aspects of the disease?
>>
>>9162839
bio major here

I'm taking a bioinformatics course this year for my undergrad, my tutor told me it generally boosts employability a lot, especially with computer-based work, so it's a good choice. I'm backing it up with other lab-based courses. I don't know what to do after graduation either, my thinking is that a bioinfo course opens many dry lab opportunities (or pure tech jobs) on its own, and the degree itself is fitted towards lab work, so it's best to have as many options available.

>>9162847
If you're talking about a bachelor's, don't. Just take my advice and stay away. Do something more general like electrical or mechanical first, and if you're still interested in bio stuff, do master's in BME and proceed accordingly. A bachelor's in BME is way too narrow. The jobs that exist in this emerging market are available only to very specialised graduates (i.e. PhDs and senior researchers). You can't hit the other engineering jobs since EEs or MEs are preferred, and you can't hit the lab jobs since the biology and biochemistry faggots have a monopoly. The market is simply not ready for BME undergrads. Unless you're 100% sure you want to take it all the way to BME and continue with a PhD, don't bottleneck your choices.
>>
Is it really better to get a general degree when you are going for your graduate?
>>
I have my PhD in Biology and a specialization in quantitative ecology. My research focuses on understanding the abiotic and biotic factors that facilitate biological invasions, then using that information to predict invader exotic distributions. I guess I'd have to say the best subfield is ecology (especially field-based), but I'm biased.
>>
>>9163193
how do you deal with getting shit on by harder biology fields?
Just realize we are all really jealous of your field trips, it comes from the heart. But man all the biochemistry and molecular biology PIs really shit on ecology kek
>>
>>9163207
I've never really been bothered by how other disciplines view my own. I know the value of my work and don't care if others think less of it. Besides, it's always fun when some biochemist or molecular biologist who is stats-phobic comes and asks me for help with their simple analyses. It's an easy way to beef up my CV with second or third authorships.
>>
Im currently studying WNS In bats

There is a fungus called psuedogymnoascus destructans that grows on bat skin (its substrate) and prevents them from hibernating, killing them.

There is a virus that was discovered that lives in the fungus that --may-- cause the increase in virulence

The issue is that bats in europe who are affected by this fungus do not die

the fungus in europe as it appears does NOT have this virus living inside them


What im studying is whether or not this virus has evolved to increase the virulence of the fungus in North America psuedogymnoascus destructans species.

Since the semester started I have been mailing various professors who have done the research about this fungus (there are less than 100 papers on this since its discovery in 2015)
>>
>>9163225
Scott?
>>
Biochemistry master race
I am going to cure cancer, screen cap this.
>>
File: phdcomic050508s.gif (51KB, 600x260px) Image search: [Google]
phdcomic050508s.gif
51KB, 600x260px
>>9163231
Good luck.
>>
>>9163215
hell yea anon that's what i like to hear. we have 1 eco major out of 10 bio/biochem grad students and we really try to mess with him but he just doesnt give a fuck, and sends us insane pictures from the trips he gets to go on, fully funded. Thanks for the stats help, i fucking hate it and you guys are damn good at it
>>
>>9163231

a guy in my year who is a bio major is trying to figure out whether branched chain amino acids DO NOT decrease muscle loss as a result of working out fasted, pretty interested stuff, he is running a bunch of assays on bacteria metabolism

>>9163227
umm no, i go to a no name school in southern illinois
>>
>>9163237
It all balances out in the end.

>>9163238
Hmm. I only ask because one of my field assistants from my master's degree (done at Southern Illinois University Carbondale, by the way) earned his PhD working on WNS.
>>
But yeah, using computers for biology problems is truly the future. Learn ALL sorts of programming and how to use it. The 1950s an onwards used computers to figure out physics problems, which led to crazy shit like PCR in chemistry and the trillions of assays in biology.

>>9163241
yeah thats where I go lol, i graduate this semester and its my senior project
>>
>>9163244
In that case, you've probably interacted with my MS advisor. Also, ask Clay to tell you about being bitten by a beaver.
>>
File: 3596444993_cb87ced880_b[1].jpg (250KB, 1024x680px) Image search: [Google]
3596444993_cb87ced880_b[1].jpg
250KB, 1024x680px
>>9159006
What do you do (job title?) and where at? Im on my last semester and have been looking at possible opportunities.

Ive done work with the Forest Service last summer as an intern and loved it. While the pay wasnt amazing I got to live in an amazing place as well and I loved going to work every morning.

Now I work as an environmental consultant doing endangered species surveys and, while it pay significantly more, is not quite as fun. I have gotten to work on some really cool projects with endemic species though.

Pic related has been mostly what Ive been working with
>>9163225
>WNS In bats
One of my coworkers worked on bats for quite a while and ran into this Sounds like really interesting work. Do you just mist net them to take samples?
>>
>>9163254
umm no there no actual field studies as of yet since I started this topic when school started this august as my senior project for a grant

there are multiple studies done on why bats are dying due to this fungus and I am researching whether or not a virus that only lives inside the north american version of the fungus has something to do with it.

There is almost no biochemical analysys done on this virus (called pd-pv pa) (pa because its the pensylvania version of the virus)


http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1006076


my major is biology with a focus on medical science and my only experience with microbe studies is a microbiology course and I am trying to learn virology on the side from here:

https://www.viprbrc.org/brc/home.spg?decorator=vipr
>>
>>9163238
>biofags
>thinking they understand chemistry beyond premed shit

wew
>>
>>9163270
You sound smart...
>>
>>9163270
well ive taken many chemistry courses such as quantitative analytical and physical chemistry lab so I know what tools are necessary

the issue is that this research project's scope is waaaay too large

I picked using genome analysis to get a paper out
>>
Is anyone here working on bioinformatics? Could you share your experience with computer-based research vs lab?
>>
>>9158697
I propose a new way of looking at microbes in the air: in their natural environment: through a 3 dimensional cubic form, 100 feet each from width, height, and length. think about it, we can look at these things under a microscope but not as they are in their habitats. we'll need a new type of microscope tho.
>>
>>9158697
they might behave differently under a microscope
>>
>>9163270
Biology is the most complex example of chemistry.
>>
Just got a job as an entry level (undergraduate degree only) molecular biologist in the industry.

Pays below average but it's easy work doing PCR all day and analyzing sequencing results.

Will try to answer questions with brutal honesty.
>>
>>9164613
Do you like it?

Do you get to chill for long or do you have to be in the lab and doing shit for the whole routine?

How long do you figure until you want to kill yourself doing this?

What do you figure you want to do after you decide that you cannot do this for the rest of your life?
>>
Background in chemical engineering and materials, but I currently work in biotech. The work I do covers bio based production, genomics analysis/sequencing, genome design and automation. It's a pretty cool space right now. Biotech is going to be hot shit in the next few years.

Advice to biofags here develop your programming and data science skills.
>>
>>9164613
pay? you see yourself doing this forever or will you eventually go back to school, especially after being salary capped?
>>
Redpill me on phycology.
>>
>>9164732
most of the experiments cannot be replicated, let alone the results replicated.
>>
whenever someone mentions the pay of their first position I instantly drop their opinions
>>
>>9164763
Psychology? I said phycology.
>>
>>9164869
holy shit lel
>>
Do bioinformaticsfags count?
>>
>>9164613

hows the pay? at least $15 an hour?\\

I worked at american red cross during summer of 2016 doing various ELISA tests and hemagluttination assays on HIV and ZIKA in St. Louis

paid $18 an hour

but its because I had to work the 12 am to 8 am shift. was an interesting 2 months of sleep.
>>
>>9164657
I like it. I have a desk and a bench on the lab. I'd say ok a normal day I am 50-50 in each. I stay pretty busy working on various small projects. I'm making $44k now and I've only been here a few months.

>>9164703
I may go back for a non-thesis master's degree. I don't plan on doing any serious research. My company will pay for some of the program after I've been there >1 year.
>>
>>9164882
Considering there's been many people itt talking/asking about bioinformatics, yeah. Plus, all life science degrees teach bioinformatics to some extent nowadays.
>>
>>9164889
Ah I didn't know, I studied computer science and have only worked on bioinformatics from that perspective. I'd actually like to continue in this area after graduation but I'm not sure what the best route would be. Should I study more biology? Most of my backgroung so far with bioinformatics had me relying heavily on someone who knew more about the biological aspects and I just threw their data through some Machine Learning tools.
>>
>>9164904
All I know is that companies tend to prefer bioinformaticians who also know their biology as well, so if you'd like to continue you should delve the science. Only if you're interested though, because in every other computer science/programming field you won't be competing with life science grads that know their programming. So it depends on your interests really, balance out the pros and cons.
>>
>>9158697
Bioinformatics grad student, biochem undergrad. Feelz good to ssh and run programs from home on the weekends while my peers come in to do wet lab. Also feels good to know a some semblance of statistics when my peers don't know the difference between an ANOVA and t-test.
>>
>>9164913
feels gr8 to put liquid from tube A to tube B for 8 hours a day
>>
>>9164909
I've always been interested in genetics and molecular chemistry topics. I'm more interested in designing tools and algorithms for usage than just using the tools. Do you think just self teaching myself the biology topics will suffice for companies?
>>
>>9162829
Hi Cajal
>>
>>9158815
bioinformatics/cheminformatics will stomp all over these fields quite soon
>>
File: 1488151628668.png (127KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]
1488151628668.png
127KB, 601x508px
How do I get into cancer research?

Or anything related to cancer
>>
>>9165278

smoke a lot of cigaratttes

drink tap water

only eat GMOs and fast-food
>>
>>9165278
Tumblr would be a good place to start
>>
>>9165443
or read this post
>>
>>9164913
so you're a glorified IT guy, good for you
>>
Got a question for ye, lads.
When performing metabolic engineering for terpene synthesis, the two candidates are e coli or yeast. Am I correct in assuming that the reason researchers like e. coli is because it's a blank slate, and the reason they like yeast is because they already have the pathways built in and have cytochrome p450 reductases?
>>
>>9163225
We chose topics for my senior seminar group presentation today. I remember reading your post, and so we agreed to present on WNS in bats. Would you be able to link me to any interesting literature? We have found a few alreay, but I would like to ask if you have any that you would personally recommend.

Thanks senpai
>>
>>9165918
usually the most important reason to use yeast over ecoli is that yeast have nuclei
otherwise no major differences
>>
>>9166080
OK, thank you.

It really seems to me that the choice which one to use is entirely at the whim of the scientist. Is that correct thinking?
>>
>>9165278
Are you at university yet? Send emails to professors who study cancer in their labs and set up meetings if they're interested in you.
>>
>>9166110
no. the model organism has to be most carefully evaluated.
>>
>>9166509
What do you mean by that? The one most suited to the job? The one that's been the most researched?
>>
>>9165918
Don't know about terpene synthesis but a general concept in protein synthesis is that Yeast is able to do some post translational modifications that are relevant to Eukaryotic proteins.
>>
>>9166744
In The Literature, Takahasi refers to yeast being able to do downstream processing. That said, someone else has made the terpenoid I'm interested in, in e. coli.
So It's a tossup
>>
>>9166757
I believe E coli is also cheaper to grow, faster to grow, and generally a lot less picky than Yeast, should that could be an advantage.
>>
>>9164904
anon let's teach each other
You teach me C.S, I'll teach you bio
>>
>>9165001
Do you have a personal tutor or something similar? Ask them, they know this shit.
>>
Biochemistry is the best subfield
Thread posts: 154
Thread images: 12


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.