Would you die if you were superglued to the bridge surface and had 100% contact with the bridge when it dropped?
If the impact didn't kill you you'd drown, so yes.
>>9155589
but it's special glue that dissolves with seawater
>>9155591
You'd still drown unless you're an Olympic swimmer
>>9155586
Well yeah, the shock when you hit the water would be like hitting concrete.
>>9155593
but you're not the direct point of contact
>>9155594
all that matters is how fast your speed changes. being attached to concrete wont make a difference
>>9155594
Wouldn't change anything, you'd still feel the shock of the sudden deceleration.
>>9155594
That doesn't negate the lethal ~100g acceleration
OP you are probably autistic. Otherwise you would be thinking about useful things instead of this brain gum.
>>9155594
Exactly, same reason why it's impossible to be injured in a car accident
>>9155592
l'm fairly sure you would not.
>>9155751
Not right away, but you would tire out before you got anywhere close to the shore; and falling into the water that fast, even without normal surface tension, would impede you considerably.
>>9155594
Technically this is what you could do to minimize the damage you'd take from, say, riding in a falling elevator. But if you're up high enough, it doesn't matter how much of your body's surface absorbs the impact. It's gonna turn you into hamburger.
>>9155800
>Not right away, but you would tire out before you got anywhere close to the shore;
Not him, but...
The bridge is only 8981' (2737 meters), and some of that is over land.
Assuming no hindrance from currents, that's well under a mile to shore.
In Boy Scouts,we used to do a mile swim every year.
If you weren't seriously injured from the fall, swimming to shore will be hard, but not a death sentence.
Let's not forget, you could presumably float until rescue arrived.
>>9155594
it's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden change in direction