>he still denies that nature violates local realism in the year 2017 AD
>he denies the implications of multiple experimental tests in the laboratory
>he thinks superdeterminism is a valid interpretation and not a metaphysical loophole that can be applied to literally any other physical model that we find unpalatable to our classical sensibilities
What's your excuse pragmatists?
>>9149117
>What's your excuse pragmatists?
I'm literally a dick sucking brainlet.
>>9149117
Violation of conservation of energy has never been observed directly. The double slit experiment and all of its spunoffs result from this. It's also why there's no problems if there's no slits.
T.fuck off
>>9149117
Why are we not friends IRL?
>>9149343
Maybe he doesn't want to find you yet.