Why doesn't strong interaction and weak interaction obey

>>9146430
i bet i can bench, squat and deadlift more than a gluon

>>9146430
>Don't strong and weak interaction know that they exist in a 3-dimensional world?
This, we can't expect them to obey the inverse square law if they are unaware of the structure of our world. We need to teach them.

>>9146436
I doubt it.

File: 1443876245898.jpg (7KB, 290x174px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 290x174px

>gravitons

File: sXpcftL.png (217KB, 672x977px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 672x977px

zee qft
set m=1 and take the derivative to get inverse square law

>>9147777
What book is that pic from?
Looks like a good read

>>9147806

he said zee qft

File: 1461969608440.jpg (234KB, 900x904px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 900x904px

>>9147808
duh, im retarded

>>9146430
Self interaction and massive gauge bosons

>>9146430
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykp4OA4bI90

>>9146430
Strong force doesn't. It believes itself to be a monkey chain made of gluons.

>>9146430
weak: force carier has mass, so it can decay, the chance it will decay depends on the distance between the 2 things interacting.
strong: self interaction in such a way that becomes stronger the further away it is

>>9146430
It probably does. Only the observer affect makes it seem like it doesn't.

That said I'm an electrical engineer by trade and an occam's razor kinda guy. I figure most shit that doesn't seem to make sense is because the observer is observing wrong or stirring the pot to measure some shit that is misguided.

>>9146436
>tfw you realize gluons are deadlifting all the matter in the universe