>can't predict the weather 7 days out >can supposedly

Trendy trends tend to trend.

>>9132718
The actual term is climate change, it's not exactly warming. "Scientists" do not predict the exact rates of effect, or the precise time of everything happening, etc. etc. they just focus on specific factors which, combined, clearly point towards this specific change.

Weather FORECAST on the other hand has to be very precise, although the weather is one of the best examples of a chaotic physical system.

There's a huge difference between the two "predictions".

Can't predict means in a deterministic way such as with mecanincs (A.K.A. orbitak motion). Thermodynamics also can't predict many things in this sense, but your car still run, the thing is to what degree of validity is you model accurate. Weather will never tell you what will happen at your house tomorrow, but it can give good predictions to general trends in weather forecasts. Considering that global warming ia happening at a fucking global scale, your forcast doesn't need to be pin point accurate, but generate prediction of trends you can obaerve at that scale.

>>9132718
They don't know their assholes from a hole in the ground and they try to lead us to expect they can accurately predict weather.

>>9132718
>another retard that can't differentiate between climate and weather
In before "Hurf durf where's the proofs it's not a misprediction?"

Climate is significantly easier to predict than weather. I know over the next year death valley will get less rain than vancouver, even though I can't tell you which days it will rain on.

File: really makes you recurse.png (259KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 540x540px

>can't predict one roll of the dice
>can supposedly predict the results of tens of thousands of dice rolls
if you really believed this is how it works, you'd be at the casino right now trying to beat the system, not shitposting on a Nigerien parasailing imageboard.

>>9132718
Climatology and meteorology are two entirely different fields you mong.

>>9132989
ever heard of statistical physics? a field that studies physical systems consisting of.. let's just say "a lot" particles, only because you can't study them one by one? probably not..

>>9132718
>can't predict the motion of particles
>can supposedly predict the motion of planets

are ""astronomers"" serious? more like astrologers!! LOL idiots

>>9132989
No. You can give an estimate as to how likely is that an event will happen and sometimes the probability is ao high you are basically certain.