If "information" in black holes is stored in 2 dimensions

>>9126800
After watching, I get the distinct impression that they didn't research their topic thoroughly enough, but I'm not a physicist.

>>9126813
same it has alot of flaws, the way they try to stick to information even though matter inside black holes gets destroyed because of hawking radiation that destroys matter with antimatter it just doesnt make alot of sense

>>9126813
Same, I got a distinct "pop-sci" feeling from it

Shit vid, desu.

In fact for some time it's just been a clickbait channel for pseudo-intellectuals so they can tell their friends what they saw to pretend to be smart.

>>9126813
Considering black holes don't really exist, you'd be correct.

File: Scientists At Work In Laboratory.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>9126800
This got me thinking. Is there a youtube channel that is like, "Kurzgesagt in a Nutshell," in subject, but takes the, "Primitive Technology," approach to showing it? Like people doing science on camera, but not explaining it in the video.

File: 5HyIlagxxSdwzhaibwGmslcDFfFselEIijrWdxo7Rs4.png (48KB, 200x183px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 200x183px

>>9126800
non /sci/ here, what the fuck was this guy saying about information? Is he talking about the arrangement of particles, if so how can arrangements of particles be lost if its just arrangements of particles? Or is he talking about the fundamentals of the universe? Or is he a fucking retard that doesn't know what he's talking about. Pic not related.