I have a hypothesis that blood loss slows the aging process in

>>9124166
Because it doesn't

Bloodletting has been a pseudo-medicine favourite for decades and only succeeded in shortening the lifespans of people

>>9124175
>>9124179
He's somewhat right, but probably is going about it retarded
http://www.health.com/mind-body/4-unexpected-benefits-of-donating-blood

>>9124166
blood loss supposedly doesn't and is implied in some studies that it will increase your aging

the studies i found (googled blood loss slows the aging process) all implied taking young people blood and inserting it into old people increases vitality although the studies were not statistically significant

>>9124166
Womin are succubi and steal your life force.
That's it.
Stay away.

>>9124179
>Bloodletting has been a pseudo-medicine favourite for decades
For Centuries & Millenniums in Fact (since Ancient Greece)
George Washington was killed due to this pseudoscience meme treatment.
His Medics originally Intended to cure George Washington's throat infection. But the Medics ended up killing Him. Because this meme efficacy is worse than Placebo because led to Anemia & Anemia led to Worse Disease, Worse Disease led to Death.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodletting

>>9124316
Lol you're the phenotype guy, I can tell from the way you write

>>9124166
Because when DNA is being replicated it loses information with each replication. It shortens and cells is off. Don't see how bloodletting could solve that

>>9125369
*cells die off

File: qt wuz cwc.jpg (67KB, 573x354px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 573x354px

>>9124316
>random capitalization
Didn't know Chris-chan browsed /sci/.