If you froze every single thing in existence, time wouldn't

But we know both time and matter were created in the big bang so you're wrong.

>>9108774
Thats wrong. The big bang only explains the spreading of them.

>If you froze every single thing in existence, time wouldn't be able to resume.
If P then Q

>Therefore the existence of time means that time has always existed
Therefore R.

Good logic there kiddo.

>>9108903
Proton decay suggests a beginning for mass and energy. Also, stop making time threads.

>Restricting your solutions to logical reasoning
195 IQ

File: timecubeflierimg.gif (19KB, 528x359px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 528x359px

>>9108721
This is nonsense and denies the basic cubic nature of time.

>>9108774
So is and does this.

Y'all need to find Time Cube Awareness, sinners.

>>9108906
I don't see the problem with the logic
P = Time is frozen
Q = Time doesn't progress
if P then Q
aka if not Q then not P
not Q
therefore not P

>>9108721
>If you froze every single thing in existence
turns out you cannot
subatomic particles move even at absolute zero

This is undoubtedly the worst thread I've seen on /sci/ so far this month

>>9108932
Now translate those symbols back into English and compare it to OP.

>>9108942
I think that's what he was trying to say

>respect goes both ways
Oh boy

>>9108939
I blame the gook/nip/poo moderation team. White mods would never allow this shit.