In the case of "human race" servants. Wouldn't

Yes.

>>9087960
Both take computational power that doesn't exist yet. That's why my life's work is going to be on superconductors and improving silicon motherboards. In 5 years I'll be able to make every geneticist bow down and sniff my sphincter

>>9087960
so you think society will motivate sentient life while there are some people who even treat machines like their first born It will be a problem no matter what but I am in the favor of
sentient life due to it having the ability to improve and evolve

>>9087968
I wish for more biological approach due to the fact that humans are incomplete and software created by us will be a mess and will just end up dominating nature in a way worse way due to not needing oxygen just energy it will be devastating

>>9087960
No. It's much easier to code in python than arranging cells and genetic sequences and hoping it does something useful.

>>9087968
I was going for an "here, have a catgirl that also does your chores" approach, but sure, that also works.

>>9087960
Why would an AI want to help people, aka retards relative to itself?