What does /sci/ think about bioinformatics? Not as a degree, (focused degrees a trash) but as a research area?
I've seen a lot of bioiformatics data published recently and it's really bothering me. This Kevin H.M. Kuo fellow and his collegues are thieves.
I have been publishing the same data for years and have proof on several forums. I have mentioned this multiple times on /sci/ too.
It's fucking obvious and I'm glad it's finally published so I can gain recognition through another's effort.
But then again I probably influenced the publisher so really I'm the mastermind.
Believe me or not, I have proof on multiple forums and date/time stamps.
>>9087495
Those cunts.
>>9087495
not very nice of them
maybe write to them? or talk to someone at your uni, or your countries academy of sciences, dunno
>>9087406
people have been using computers to study physics and chemistry
they are now using computers to study biology (genetics)
>>9087406
Genome, transcriptome, metabolome, interactome...
What will they come up with next? It's very interesting. Is the interactome the ultimate "-ome"?
Bioinformatics is 99% of playing around with simple string manipulation methods. I'm a _real_ Computer Scientist and don't bother with trivial polynomial-time algorithms; that's for brainlets.
bioinformaticians will cure cancer, screencap this
>>9087523
I guess thats true, I'm interested since, biology was one of my fav subjects in hs, but in the end I went for software/computer engineering
>>9087529
the department that I want to join, just co-published a study about depressions comorbidities using bayesian filtering
it's not just playing with genome sequences, bio statistics and medical decision support systems are pretty interesting desu
>>9087528
memome
It is to memetics what a genome is to genetics