So this guy "Dr." Randell L. Mills claims he has a

>>9086632
He's a retard. I followed it like months ago. His website has changed a lot in that time and the research is nonsensical.
It's a really good scam because there are presentations and papers that seem like "hey this guy has his shit together"

>>9086632
Is the universe a perpetual motion machine?

>>9087677
No

>>9086632
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwZDl56k_yc
OP here, just look at all the photon energy coming off of this thing. It must be producing more power than they're putting into it? I think this guy might be the real deal, he's written a 400 page book on quantum physics too, seems legit huh i just skimmed it briefly but it has equations and everything. And why else would somebody invest 10 million into his company if it was a scam?

File: lol.png (60KB, 1011x548px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1011x548px

>>9086632
>scroll down on this idiot's PDF
>first thing I see is pic related
Yeah he's retarded.

>>9087694
Nice try Randell.

>>9087695
Do you recognize these equations? What mistake is he making?

>>9087695 he sited his source for these numbers, the numbers at lest are correct. Is he doing something funny with the fine structure constant? I don't even know what that is.
https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/Preprints/lsa2010.pdf

>>9087695
a = 7.2973525664e-3 %fine structure constant
mu_me = (a^-2/(2*pi))^(2/3)*(1+2*pi*a^2/2)/(1+a/2)
mt_mu = (a^-1/2)^(2/3)*(1+a/2)/(1-4*pi*a^2)
mt_me = (a^-3/(4*pi))^(2/3)*(1+2*pi*a^2/2)/(1-4*pi*a^2)
mN_m3 = (12*pi^2/(1-a))*sqrt(sqrt(3)/a)*(1+2*pi*a^2/2)/(1-2*pi*a^2/2)

mu_me =2.067682797563009e+02
mt_mu =16.816755743482723
mt_me =3.477171656161817e+03
mN_m3 =1.838674148950631e+03

Not sure what's so funny about this, I typed all the equations in just to check the arithmetic and it all works, and the final values all agree with rations on the NIST site. If its not a correct application of the fine structure constant, why do all rations come out correct?