DAE have more respect for someone who fails out of 3rd year STEM

>>9086549
PhD gets more respect from me, even if it's bullshit subject, it means he can graduate 2 programs while you cannot graduate from 1. shows lack of commitment/drive

>>9086549
Depends entirely on what either of the degrees are. But realistically speaking, the most common non-STEM PhDs tend to range from colonial studies to lesbian dance theory in terms of retardation so I guess the stem failure gets my sympathy.

>>9086549
To anyone wondering what does DAE mean is "Does anybody here".

I'd say neither because what kind of retard drops out at 3rd year in STEM, he has made it this far and he couldn't finish the degree?
And no respect to any non-STEM PhD because >>9086556, but maybe, MAYBE I'll respect something like Economics or Business since there are PhD programs for Finance that aren't DBA, but nothing else.

>>9086570
Economics is pseudoscience at best and Business is for upper middle class normies with low intellect but rich parents.

The only non-stem degrees I'll respect are literature, Philosophy and History as they are not pseudoscientific/complete bullshit

>>9086589
I respect Business majors and graduates for their leadership and sympathy (sometimes, you know there's always that bitch sociopath).
But can you explain those high salaries for Econ PhDs? No way in hell a "pseudoscience" gets those high salaries out of nowhere.

And forgot about literature and philosophy, but I always question History academics.
Since y'know how Bill "Let's rape vanilla!" Nye got that nice cash for saying bullshit that everyone fucking praises him.
History nowdays can be easily corrupted.

>>9086570
>>9086549
>DAE
>To anyone wondering what does DAE mean is "Does anybody here".
You have to go back

File: Capture.png (6KB, 500x142px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 500x142px

>>9086704
A-Anon, I'm not OP.

>>9086549
It's been awhile since I heard STEM, it is called STEAM now grandpa.

>>9086614
Economics is based on the debunked claim that 1) humans are all rational actors in the market and 2) that value is based upon utility and not labour/utility mix. Econs is a junk field and will be scrapped by behaviour psychs who ACTUALLY analysis how people engage in transacations/market behaviour rather then dumb cunts making up hypothesis then proving them with
> le magical hand of the free market XDDD

no, dropping out of a stem program in undergraduate is laughable stop being a fucking dinner roll and go to class, study, and use the resources you have available. jesus christ the average undergrad program is what 20 hours of class a week "SUCH DIFFICULTY OMG" at least the person with the meme phd has some measure of discipline, ambition, and motivation

>>9086948
have you ever taken an econ class?
its not sociology. Most economic concepts are pretty fundamental.

Besides, if economics has been debunked, how come the fed keeps hiring hundreds of econ phds? Or are you one of those people who thinks the fed is a giant scam

>>9086549
no, if you fail out of STEM it probably means you never liked STEM

>>9086570
>respecting people in business and finance
i pull ticks off my cock that i respect more than those sociopaths. Any Phd in analytic philosophy is just as good as any phd in science or math

There is literally nothing wrong with non STEM majors, it's their choice I guess. Just saying not every non-STEM degree is useless, and a lot of people are getting angry and calling it the "STEM meme". It doesn't help how much drama and shuffling the program has now for some reason, mostly regarding women, who don't seem to be that interested anyway.

>>9086948
youre an even bigger idiot than the person you replied to. The "economists" on TV are not academic economists. You are thinking of a perverted propaganda version of neoliberal economics. Although there is plenty wrong with your typical economist, its not like you suggest.Their main problem is their irrational commitment to abstracta.
> that value is based upon utility and not labour/utility mix.
thats true in capitalist economies LBV is exclusive to market socialism, like mutualist anarchism for example.
In capitalist economics(there is more than one type of economic system studied in economics) value is based on capital (sensu; to capitalize) and everything else is an externality.
You sound like an uninformed democrat arguing on Facebook. You have no knowledge to form a factual criticism of which you speak.