Why do people seem to think that we are living in the most objectively

what the fuuuuuuu
are you seriously making this argument? Or is this bait are you actually joking

You could use that kind of logic on anything and everything at all. With that kind of logic you can't prove anything. How much proof do you need to say something is or isn't Jesus Christ how do you not see the inconsistencies with that line of though

The scientific consensus today, is that your mom is a whore.

Not even a few hundred years can change that.

File: 4bf.png (181KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 625x626px

>>9086436
b8 checklist:
>Langan
>Flat-earth
>we can't no nuffin

>b8/10
>Great Job Billy!

>>9086436
http://hermiene.net/essays-trans/relativity_of_wrong.html

>undeniable logic
>must b bait!!!111

>>9086474
>not understanding how deductive logic works

The flat earth thing you said is retarded to the extreme because it has been verified tenfold with proof. Science however will never prove how something can come from nothing, it's theoretically impossible. That's why God is not a gap filler but a reasonable link.

>>9086497
There can be all the proof in the world, it matters for naught considering that it's impossible to know anything for certain.

>>9086436
>Science can never be 100% sure of anything.
From a bayesionist's perspective, no agent can be 100% sure of anything at any time.

What's your point?

>>9086532
You still never even come close to proving that something comes from nothing. Not even close. Thiests have all the reasonable findings possible for a man to accept rational faith

>>9086436
Nobody really thinks this. It's your prerogative that you invented from having a young and skeptical mind. Consider the amount of new shit that gets created on a regular basis and how much things change in such a short amount of time. Nobody thinks we have peaked and if they do they have no perspective