So with the Riemann hypothesis you can take any combination of real and imaginary and reduce it to zero in the real. Except for 1.
How is this acceptable. Obviously this doesn't follow modern continuity theory. This is a mathematical anomaly.
Please explain how we can claim this outside of mathematical analysis.
>So with the Riemann hypothesis you can take any combination of real and imaginary and reduce it to zero in the real. Except for 1.
This isn't sensible.
The Riemann zeta function is one defined for all complex numbers, except for 1.
Riemann hypothesis says something about a particular subset of complex numbers.
Your sentence doesn't fit.
>>9073536
just curious but what do you mean by
>reduce it to zero
>>9073536
Anything with imaginary numbers I just pretend doesn't exist because it's based of sqrt(-1) which can' exist. I do think it is very cool how you can calculate an integral on the real line with it but other than that I just take it as a bunch of mumbo jumbo. I haven't taken much physics so maybe thats why I don't really like i
i really want to stick my dick in there
>>9073625
It turns back up in control theory, quantum mechanics, AC circuit design, or really just any advanced application of waveform analysis.
aloe are cool plant
>>9074084
>>9073924
On the first day, God said;
And let Aloe, the most fuckable of plants, be irresistible to anon, across all boards, until the end of time.
And so it was.
>>9074111
part of me thinks it'll really hurt because those look like spikes but another part of me doesn't care
>>9073625
You need to check out what a field extension is.
Or finite fields.
2=sqrt(-1) (mod 5)
3=sqrt(-1) (mod 5)
>>9074587
what the fuck are you saying
>>9073536
That looks delicious.