Why do we not yet just simply determine ANY prime by means o

>>9064823
oh for heavens sake
*perfect

>>9064823
Because the Riemann hypothesis is an open problem.

>>9064833
thats almost a red herring
a fractal would circumvent that

>>9064823
>density
>prime gaps
how on earth can you extrapolate any prime number from this?

>>9064835
I just took a look at your shitty link. No proof of the claim is provided. Nor could there have been, because the distribution of prime numbers is an open problem.

i.e. if a fractal could be determine that independently matches all, or a significantly amount, of gaps or meta gaps, and then give us a few new largest known primes, it would circumvent this:
>>9064833

>>9064837
conjecture a fractal that fits a few thousand or hundred thousand prime gaps or meta gaps, and refine it until it matches perfectly, then extend and see if it matched up to the largest known, and see if it can give us another new largest

>>9064841
Good luck with that. Solving it is no easier than solving the RH.

>>9064839
why are you upset?
just be nice

>>9064844
forever relevant

>>9064844
false equivalence fallacy

>pure mathematics correlates to some material emotional real world phenomenon

>>9064852
p.s.
and that with a sample of 1
primes known >50,000,000

>>9064845
this is a simplification

>>9064857
>this is a simplification
lolno

>>9064865
where are the proofs?