>the universe was created by a big bang >matter cannot

>>9064739
>matter cannot be created or destroyed
who are you quoting?

>>9064739
WHAT SHOW IS THIS. I REMEMBER IT.

>>9064739
You do not understand what science is fundamentally about.

>>9064739
>matter cannot be created or destroyed
"The first law of thermodynamics doesn't actually specify that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, but instead that the total amount of energy in a closed system cannot be created nor destroyed"
Literally after googling "matter cannot be created or destroyed"

File: kabbalah100.jpg (53KB, 266x361px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 266x361px

>pic related

>>9064770
Animal Planet's the Most Extreme

File: IMG_4938.jpg (120KB, 979x832px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 979x832px

>>9064889
>the universe (everything in existence) isn't a closed system

File: 1200px-Structure_of_the_Universe.jpg (208KB, 1200x983px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1200x983px

>>9064739
>>9064921
The known universe isn't a closed system, per se. The big bang isn't the beginning of the universe.

The universe is an infinite 3D space structured via entropic forces to look much like a larger version of galactic filaments, where some areas are expanding (like ours) and other areas are contracting (like areas near the currently observable universe.)

File: 1500273831243.jpg (22KB, 552x468px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 552x468px

>matter cannot be created or destroyed

You guys are forgetting that the big bang theory doesn't make any assertions about where that initial singularity of mass came from, only that if it existed, it would have developed into a universe consistent with what we observe today.

>>9064739
>>the universe was created by a big bang
>>matter cannot be created or destroyed
Yeah what the fuck are you talking about?

>muh random quantum fluctuations

physicists are so fucking retarded lmao

>>9064739

We create matters everyday, here, in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation

>>9064739 >>9064744 >>9065017

Conservation of mass Law
don't hold true in Modern Physics (Relativity , Quantum Mechanics, String Theory)
It's valid only in Newtonian Classical Physics (19th Century Outdated High School Level Physics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass
>In general relativity, mass (and energy) conservation in expanding volumes of space is a complex concept, subject to different definitions, and neither mass nor energy is as strictly and simply conserved as is the case in special relativity and in Minkowski space.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass#Matter_is_not_perfectly_conserved
>The principle of matter conservation may be considered as an approximate physical law that is true only in the classical sense, without consideration of special relativity and quantum mechanics.

File: unexpectedda.jpg (842KB, 999x760px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 999x760px

>>9065030
>Conservation of mass Law

Not in this case. Matter (elementary particles) is literally created from the high-speed collision of other particles. At the end, you have more matter.

>>9064739
Neither of those statements are scientific. The Big Bang is an observed event that happened some time ago. It's commonly believed to be the beginning of time for various reasons but that isn't a scientific claim. Your second statement literally isn't true according to any scientific model, I don't know where you pulled that from. In thermodynamics we do mass balance to make sure shit isn't just appearing or disappearing in our systems but that is by no means a fundamental principle.

>>9064921
>thinks that the Big Bang was the beginning of all existence
Proof pls.

>>9064739
HIGGS NIGGA!
EVERYTHING EXISTED!
THEN THE HIGGS FIELD GAVE IT MASS AND IT INTERACTED!
DUUUUUUUUUUH!

>>9064739
What's funny is that people try to visualize the big bang as if it was a small ball of dense matter that exploded for no reason, when more realistically I think it was like a wave that created spatial imbalances that resulted in pulsating waves and particles dissipating that imbalance, eventually creating matter. It might look like an explosion but it started with nothing.

>>9065039
No it's just visiting from where it's from. Not created or destroyed, transported.

>>9064889
Wouldn't it be added to or subtracted from?

>>9064739
>the universe was created by a big bang
we don't know that

>>9064739
>implying that the laws of physics need to apply before the universe existed

how do you know anything was created or destroyed? who's to say that it wasn't all there already?