Thread replies: 11
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
Analysis and Assessment of the Gateway Process
2017-07-25 05:03:06 Post No. 9062248
[Report] Image search: [Google]
2017-07-25 05:03:06 Post No. 9062248
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: entanglement.png (126KB, 681x352px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 681x352px
This .PDF has been posted on /x/:
cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf
>And in doing so, they [entangled particles] violate relativity's ban on faster than light velocities.
Let's use the convention of expressing a certain physical property of a
particle [math]A[/math] by means of a linear combination.
Say [math]\alpha_{1}v_{1}+\alpha_{2}v_{2}[/math], where the vector
[math]v_{1}[/math] is left-hand side of a box while [math]v_{2}[/math] r-hand side.
Our convention requires also that (QM axioms, right?) [math]|\alpha_{1}|^{2}[/math]
be the chance of finding the particle l-hand side.
[math]|\alpha_{1}|^{2}+|\alpha_{2}|^{2}=1[/math] so that the chances of finding
the particle either in [math]v_{1}[/math] or [math]v_{2}[/math] are [math]100\%[/math].
So if a particle [math]B[/math] is *entangled* with [math]A[/math], a *measurement* for [math]A[/math]
in [math]v_{1}[/math] would yield a [math]100\%[/math] measurement of [math]B[/math] in [math]v_{2}[/math].
This independently of [math]|\alpha_{2,B}|^{2}[/math]. Since any result of
measurement on [math]A[/math] is probabilistic, we cannot communicate by Morse code.
Is this correct?
If yes, how is relativity violated if entanglement does not allow for information to travel faster than light?
>>
>>9062248
* a measurement for [math]A[/math] in [math]v_{2}[/math] would yield...
>>
>>9062248
You just spent several minutes analyzing a piece of bullshitt posted on /x/. What's wrong with you?
No, entanglement does not involve information transfer, or information traveling faster than light.
>>
>>9062275
>No, entanglement does not involve information transfer, or information traveling faster than light.
normie retard here, why is this? is it because you can't predict or control the spin of each particle?
>>
>>9062281
>normie retard here, why is this?
This is literally what OP is about.
>>
>>9062275
That pdf file is from the cia you dumbfuck
>>
>>9062529
It's probably just some bullshit they leaked to the KGB ages ago to screw with them and only recently declassified.
>>
>>9062281
buy a pair of gloves and put each one in a box then send one box to your friend. When he opens it and see's you sent him the left glove he knows instantly that your box must have the right glove.
>>
>>9062248
That's because Copenhagen interpretation is unsound: the postulates of Schrodinger's equation and wave function collapse are not independent and contradict each other.
>>
>>9062645
>the postulates of Schrodinger's equation and wave function collapse are not independent and contradict each other.
Prove it.
>>
I finished reading the report and it is essentially a waste of time.
The author is a layman and yet he makes statements such
>Now that we have postulated the legitimacy [?] of the assertion that the energy forms which compose consciousness can move beyond the time-space dimension [...]
>Having ascertained that human consciousness is able to separate from physical reality and interact with other intelligences in other dimensions [...]
based on a dubious bibliography.
>At first [Science Digest] it tended to favor breathless cover lines, and often turned to pseudoscience topics, including spontaneous human combustion and UFOs -Wiki.
He attended the one week course at the Monroe Institute but he did not report about any personal experience, meaning he had no meaningful ones.
Not only he has no experience in OBEs but he is unfamiliar with dream journaling.
>Admittedly, some people can be trained to remember their REM state dreams through intense conditioning [!] in the waking state [...]
Then, look at the uploaded snippet.
This apparently is one of the most striking results at the Monroe Institute, an anecdote with statistically irrelevant results.
OBEs are real by definition (dreaming of leaving the body) but there is no proof about using the to acquire impossible information.
Thread posts: 11
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2